Trump-Kasich Feud Has GOP Worried About Ohio

CPUd said:
Go make some Clinton threads and see what happens.
Click to expand...

The irony is -by their logic means that since they post Trump threads then they are helping / supporting Trump and should be banned.
 
John Kasich has refused to support Trump or attend the convention in his home state, and instead engaged in counter programming around Cleveland that was decidedly non-Trumpian. At one of his many events within walking distance from the convention arena, he told an audience at a think tank on Tuesday that he was “very, very concerned” about the “stew of growing nationalism, growing isolationism, anti-immigration and anti-trade.”
Click to expand...

Indeed

The governor’s schedule and his refusal to welcome the Republican presidential candidate to his state irritated the Trump campaign and some party officials seeking unity. Trump Campaign Chairman Paul Manafort began the week by criticizing the governor, calling him “petulant” and an “embarrassment” to Ohio.
Click to expand...

Someone get the Trump campaign a thesaurus, stat.

“It’s very sad that the host governor doesn’t have the decency to show — he doesn’t have to endorse Trump, but he could have come out of decency and said, ‘Welcome to Ohio. I’m glad you’re in Ohio,’” Newt Gingrich told RealClearPolitics. “I think it’s goofy for John to do this.”
Click to expand...

...and a dictionary, with which to locate "irony."

“You win battleground states by addition, by building coalitions. The onus is on Mr. Trump and his campaign to win Ohio,” Kasich’s top strategist, John Weaver, told RCP. “I think the anti-Clinton message is important, but we’re just talking to each other. So, for the disaffected Republicans and Independents and disaffected Democrats, what’s the positive message about bringing people together?”
Click to expand...

Yuge deals, and winning, and "believe me"...
 
CPUd said:
Go make some Clinton threads and see what happens.
Click to expand...

Interesting reply. I can't help but wonder why you refuse to answer a simple and straight forward question.

So what now... do you report me to a mod for having the gall to ask you a question?
 
Cleaner44 said:
Interesting reply. I can't help but wonder why you refuse to answer a simple and straight forward question.

So what now... do you report me to a mod for having the gall to ask you a question?
Click to expand...

That's his defense strategy to pretend to be obtuse so you have to type more and waste your time while he makes shit posts all over the forum. Then he will come back and spam your replies away with more shit posts.

Edit: whether intentional or not on his part propaganda works this way. He spams you with information so that you at some point start to internalize some of the statements as true. He will make a liberal article posts like Republicans laugh at god. Then he will mention this like four times in every thread. Behold the seed is planted. Then you see others defend it.
 
Last edited:
silverhandorder said:
That's his defense strategy to pretend to be obtuse so you have to type more and waste your time while he makes shit posts all over the forum. Then he will come back and spam your replies away with more shit posts.

Edit: whether intentional or not on his part propaganda works this way. He spams you with information so that you at some point start to internalize some of the statements as true. He will make a liberal article posts like Republicans laugh at god. Then he will mention this like four times in every thread. Behold the seed is planted. Then you see others defend it.
Click to expand...

Interesting theory, but untrue.
 
THE PLAN was for Jeb or similar elite puppet to win the nomination, with Kasich as his running mate, to run a FL/OH ticket as a simple paint-by-numbers, supposedly 'slam-dunk' fall campaign strategy. The Bush clan, and Kasich are still furious that Trump upset their apple cart. It's really that simple.
 
Peace&Freedom said:
THE PLAN was for Jeb or similar elite puppet to win the nomination, with Kasich as his running mate, to run a FL/OH ticket as a simple paint-by-numbers, supposedly 'slam-dunk' fall campaign strategy. The Bush clan, and Kasich are still furious that Trump upset their apple cart. It's really that simple.
Click to expand...

Kasich's behavior during the primaries was bizarre. He was connected enough to the network execs for them to change their rules so he could get into the main debates, and did much of nothing until it was down to the last 5. Even when it was down to the last 3, he made no real attempts to build out his campaign to be competitive in more than 2 or 3 states. He was much stronger in Indiana than Cruz, yet makes some weird deal with the Cruz campaign to back out of IN, and then denied such a deal existed, which hurt him overall. He strenuously refused to suspend his campaign while he was splitting the non-Trump vote, then suddenly drops the day after Cruz.
 
silverhandorder said:
I am going to try and remember this prediction come Nov.
Click to expand...

8 years, bing, time for change.

Carter had 4, Reagan/Bush 12, but after that Clinton 8, Bush 8, Obama 8. Before Carter, Eisenhower 8, Kennedy/LBJ 8, Nixon/Ford 8.

So, in the last 64 years, there's only been one election that didn't meet that formula. If it was Carter instead of Reagan in 1980, it would've been 8 sets of 8 going back and forth.
 
Feelgood said:
Of course you do. You hate Trump and are a pro-Hillary shill. Everyone knows it.
Click to expand...

No, despite Trumpkins continually making that assertion, all of the Trump critics here (with the possible exception of Zippy, who IIRC actually is a Democrat) are motivated by his radically anti-libertarian record and agenda. You really shouldn't be surprised to find that libertarians on a libertarian forum don't like anti-libertarian candidates.
 
Feelgood said:
Of course you do. You hate Trump and are a pro-Hillary shill. Everyone knows it.
Click to expand...

Can you find anything pro-Hillary he's posted?

Hating Trump just means he fits right in here. Do you like Trump or something?
 
r3volution 3.0 said:
No, despite Trumpkins continually making that assertion, all of the Trump critics here (with the possible exception of Zippy, who IIRC actually is a Democrat) are motivated by his radically anti-libertarian record and agenda. You really shouldn't be surprised to find that libertarians on a libertarian forum don't like anti-libertarian candidates.
Click to expand...

So why are his threads always tearing down the anti-libertarian candidate Trump and never the anti-libertarian candidate Clinton?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

PAF
3 states sending 700 National Guard troops to DC
2 3
Replies
51
Views
566
acptulsa
acptulsa
PAF
Trump administration could deploy 1,000 troops to Louisiana cities until 2026, report says
Replies
7
Views
62
unknown
unknown
Brian4Liberty
  • Featured
Trump Declares WAR On Massie and Rand!
Replies
19
Views
162
acptulsa
acptulsa
jmdrake
Trump admin sending Taliban $45M sparks Republican backlash
Replies
3
Views
32
nikcers
nikcers
PAF
Trump threatens to send ‘more than National Guard’ to US cities
Replies
8
Views
41
nikcers
nikcers
Back
Top