Trump is backing Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s (R-GA) new bill that would EXCLUDE illegal immigrants from the census

Swordsmyth

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2016
Messages
74,737
President Trump is backing Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s (R-GA) new bill that would EXCLUDE illegal immigrants from the census. Once it’s law, the U.S. Census Bureau will be REQUIRED to conduct a new census “immediately.”

Democrats would be poised to lose House seats and electoral college votes if passed.

Greene wrote on 𝕏: “I just got off the phone with President Trump!! I told [Trump] about my new bill I am introducing that will save America’s elections from ever being stolen again!”

“My bill will require the U.S. Census Bureau to conduct a new census immediately upon enactment of the bill. In conducting the new census of the U.S. population, it shall require questions determining the citizenship of each individual, and count US citizens only.”

“Upon completion of the census, the bill will direct states to immediately begin a redistricting of all U.S. House seats process using only the population of United States citizens.”

Code:
https://x.com/RedWave_Press/status/1939710482652201023

 
If Congress wasn't the most feckless group of people in world history, I would be hopeful this would pass. It's why I give Trump a pass for ruling by decree.
 
If Congress wasn't the most feckless group of people in world history, I would be hopeful this would pass. It's why I give Trump a pass for ruling by decree.

It's designed that way. And you, like others, fall for it.

You guys believe in "voting". You guys believe crony msm when they tell you "other" has no chance of winning, and preselects who you can vote for on the ballot. You guys elect the same scum in your districts [and for president] election after election.

Don't complain when the precedent is set now and in-the-future. You, and others like you, are directly responsible.
 
It's designed that way. And you, like others, fall for it.

You guys believe in "voting". You guys believe crony msm when they tell you "other" has no chance of winning, and preselects who you can vote for on the ballot. You guys elect the same scum in your districts [and for president] election after election.

Don't complain when the precedent is set now and in-the-future. You, and others like you, are directly responsible.
How much of an ego do you have to have to assume everyone is ignorant to the game plan but you?

At the same time, how delusional do you have to be to believe that we don't already live in this system? Ruling by decree had been happening since at least 1865, depending on who you ask. I know libertarians always think they are the smartest in the room, but often they aren't.
 
How much of an ego do you have to have to assume everyone is ignorant to the game plan but you?

My ego is pretty damned big. And that's excluding taking into consideration how stupid people are.

At the same time, how delusional do you have to be to believe that we don't already live in this system?

People like you made it this way. I promise you that's a perfectly correct answer.

Ruling by decree had been happening since at least 1865, depending on who you ask.

Don't complain then. That's how dictators are made.

I know libertarians always think they are the smartest in the room, but often they aren't.

Perhaps. But this one is 😉

Don't argue with me, you'll be much better off 👍
 
My ego is pretty damned big. And that's excluding taking into consideration how stupid people are.



People like you made it this way. I promise you that's a perfectly correct answer.



Don't complain then. That's how dictators are born.



Perhaps. But this one is 😉

Don't argue with me, you'll be much better off 👍
How very collectivist of you. I guess you aren't as principled as your ego leads you to believe.
 
I guess you aren't as principled as your ego leads you to believe.

Guess all you want, but nobody cares unless and until you point out which of his principles he just violated. Assuaging your Team Player Snowflake Feewings has Never been among his Principles to the Best of my Knowledge!
 
Not including them in the census is one way to make things look better than they really are.

He can claim WINNING while keeping actual deportations low.
 
It's not just redistricing, it's also funding reallocations. A lot would change, there are many implications. I haven't looked at it yet, but probably am for it.
 
It's not just redistricing, it's also funding reallocations. A lot would change, there are many implications. I haven't looked at it yet, but probably am for it.

More Bait and Switch, and "rebuilding trust in government", per the WEF.

Milton Friedman: "Look, for example, at the obvious, immediate, practical example of illegal Mexican immigration. Now, that Mexican immigration, over the border, is a good thing. It’s a good thing for the illegal immigrants. It’s a good thing for the United States. It’s a good thing for the citizens of the country. But, it’s only good so long as it’s illegal."​
 
Things will be much easier now that we can amend the constitution with a law.
 
More Bait and Switch, and "rebuilding trust in government", per the WEF.

Milton Friedman: "Look, for example, at the obvious, immediate, practical example of illegal Mexican immigration. Now, that Mexican immigration, over the border, is a good thing. It’s a good thing for the illegal immigrants. It’s a good thing for the United States. It’s a good thing for the citizens of the country. But, it’s only good so long as it’s illegal."​

I agree mostly. Because if they come legally, we have to support them. If they come illegally they help our economy without draining our welfare system. But I am really for option 3, just give a green card to any immigrant who wants one, but give no entitlements until citizenship.

So you can have legal immigration that is good for our country.
 
I agree mostly. Because if they come legally, we have to support them. If they come illegally they help our economy without draining our welfare system. But I am really for option 3, just give a green card to any immigrant who wants one, but give no entitlements until citizenship.

So you can have legal immigration that is good for our country.

That just contradicted everything that Friedman said in Post #12, and ultimately leads to a Welfare State.

YOU are "Part of the Problem".

What's wrong with keeping them undocumented, and allow them to work for a living, and if in a crunch, they can utilize local donations and churches for temporary help?
 
That just contradicted everything that Friedman said in Post #12, and ultimately leads to a Welfare State.

YOU are "Part of the Problem".

What's wrong with keeping them undocumented, and allow them to work for a living, and if in a crunch, they can utilize local donations and churches for temporary help?

I'm not for open borders. I want to know who is in our country and why. I'm for open legal immigration.
 
Things will be much easier now that we can amend the constitution with a law.
Last 12 decades or so Id say most legislation is in violation of Article 1 section 8 and 99percent of America didnt seem to care
 
Personally I doubt senate could get 25 votes for Doge cuts of any kind or 45 votes to remove illegals from medicaid. Adding 5 trillion to debt about it
 
Back
Top