Trump Goes to War Against Iran

[angelatc]

They don't kiss our ass enough so they might as well be nonody and don't exist according to you because you said we dont have any allies in the middle east.

Saudi Arabia is a major funder of terrorism in the Middle East - how can we possibly be allies with them? Someone said funding terrorism was bad, and people who aren't dainty sniveling little chicken hawks should be over there exchanging bullets with countries that do that?

 

[angelatc]

I don't care how it sounds im not going to lie.

Those bone spurs must be just awful.

 

[enhanced_deficit]

They should have been thanking us for taking out Saddam for them.

EM.

^this is somewhat insightful statement in 2019.

Although, much more credit should be given to visionary Polish-Israeli leader Netanyahu who had said something similar way back in back in 2003 when most US taxpayers were still on the fence about investing US money and lives for spreading freedom in Iraq, Palestine, Syria and other mideast places.

+rep to ss and Netanyahu.





Related
Top US General Says American Troops Should Be Ready To Die For Israel

Iraq/Afghanistan wars disabled 624,000 US troops , Divorces up 42%, Foreclosures up 217%

 

[nikcers]

Those bone spurs must be just awful.

Yeah i have spent years in the hospital for bone spurs. So poetic you know me so well.

 

[AngryCanadian]

An all out war? Probably not. We have the greatest military on the planet, so Trump can engage in acts of war with impunity with pretty much any nation. And drunken monkey is proving he is the craziest of them all, so Iran will probably not openly do anything. But some interests want the destruction of Iran at any cost, and they will continue to push for that.

From a constitutional conservative perspective, the letter and intent of the Constitution was that only the Congress has the power to declare war. It doesn’t matter how bad the guy was that was killed, there is a constitutional process, and it was not followed.

You nailed it. This killing of this general was not done by a constitutional manner. Trump might have saved himself over the impeachment but how far will the senate go by defending Trump over a killing of Iranian general which wasn't done in a constitutional decision?

I think some Trump supporters in here need a cooler head to see some things.

By the way dont get me wrong i dont see any chance that Biden might have agaisnt Trump when knowing Biden has made mistakes. But Trump needs to be very careful of not letting himself be dragged by the deep state. Or whatever you want to call it.

But i agree with the others trump isnt very smart either, the way he posted that American flag on his social media page wasn't a good idea.

 

[Swordsmyth]

You nailed it. This killing of this general was not done by a constitutional manner. Trump might have saved himself over the impeachment but how far will the senate go by defending Trump over a killing of Iranian general which wasn't done in a constitutional decision?

Congress passed the laws that supposedly authorize this kind of thing, they will not impeach him for it.

 

[nikcers]

You nailed it. This killing of this general was not done by a constitutional manner. Trump might have saved himself over the impeachment but how far will the senate go by defending Trump over a killing of Iranian general which wasn't done in a constitutional decision?

The IRGC was designated a terrorist organization using the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA).

 

[AngryCanadian]

Elijah J. Magnier
@ejmalrai
Replying to
@ejmalrai

@realDonaldTrump
and 3 others
#BreakingNews:

In response to the #US assassination, Moqtada al-Sadr gives the orders for his military branch "Jaish al-Imam al-Mahdi" and not "Sara al-salam" to indicate his readiness for war against the #US in #Iraq. He may be referring to the return of the era of 2004.

Returning to the era of 2004.

 

[AngryCanadian]

The IRGC was designated a terrorist organization using the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA).

And who wanted IRGC designated a terrorist organization more? think. The news i just posted is not looking good. The Trump admin was dragged in a dangerous pov.

 

[nikcers]

And who wanted IRGC designated a terrorist organization? KSA,Israel.

The congrress did when they granted that authority to the executive branch and didn't do anything after he declared them a FTO last April.

 

[AngryCanadian]

The congrress did when they granted that authority to the executive branch and didn't do anything after he declared them a FTO last April.

NeoCons wanted to designated them as terrorists because they needed enemies, America is already helping Jihadists in Syria. Its rather comical how we arent bombing any more AQ officials eh?

 

[AngryCanadian]

Elijah J. Magnier
@ejmalrai
·
1m
#BreakingNews:
#Iraq Asaeb Ahl Al-Haq Leader Kais al-Khaz'ali calls for a
general mobilisation of his forces to "expel the #US forces from #Iraq".

"It won't be easy and simple but you have to trust we shall defeat them", he said.

Its already looking bad. Whats the Trump admin going to do? go to war agaisnt Militants who are hardened?

 

[angelatc]

And who wanted IRGC designated a terrorist organization more? think. The news i just posted is not looking good. The Trump admin was dragged in a dangerous pov.

An important note: Trump's designation is the first time ever that an arm of a foreign government has been designated as a terrorist group. So it would appear that Trump has been planning an end run around Congress for quite some time.

I am going to go out on a limb here and say Ron Paul warned us about this crap.

 

[angelatc]

Its already looking bad. Whats the Trump admin going to do? go to war against Militants who are hardened?

Uniting Iran and Iraq. What a great leader he is.

Iraq will fight to get us out of their country, since politely asking for the last decade didn't work. Iran will ally with them, and the chicken hawks are going to scream that Iran is sponsoring terrorism.

And there's nothing we can do to stop any of this.

 

[AngryCanadian]

Uniting Iran and Iraq. What a great leader he is.

Iraq will fight to get us out of their country, since politely asking for the last decade didn't work. Iran will ally with them, and the chicken hawks are going to scream that Iran is sponsoring terrorism.

And there's nothing we can do to stop any of this.

And there's nothing we can do to stop any of this.

Nothing expect a economic crisis again. And riots over food prices.Which had being strangely growing more or so here in Canada. I hear rumors of a potential economic crisis happening.

Looks like they have being planning this crisis for a long time. Hoping to profit from it.

 

[nikcers]

NeoCons wanted to designated them as terrorists because they needed enemies, America is already helping Jihadists in Syria. Its rather comical how we arent bombing any more AQ officials eh?

America voted overwhelmingly for the guy who ran on the platform of taking the oil in Iraq
The congress didnt elect themselves either. They could of sent different people to washington if this wasnt what they wanted.

 

[susano]

Indignation about IRAN attacking Americans is perfectly justified.
We didn't invade Iran.

The United States invaded Iraq. It was not justified. Once that happened, the US was in no position to be indignant about the next door neighbor of Iraq getting involved and killing US troops. To claim the US had or has any right to be indignant about it's forces getting killed by by a party they did not invade, while they were/are invaders and occupiers themselves, is madness. This is not about likeing the Iranian regime. It's about acknowledging that they had/have a legitimate interest in what goes on right next door. Western occupation of their neighbor poses a real threat to them.

 

[AngryCanadian]

America voted overwhelmingly for the guy who ran on the platform of taking the oil in Iraq
The congress didnt elect themselves either. They could of sent different people to washington if this wasnt what they wanted.

America voted overwhelmingly for the guy who ran on the platform of taking the oil in Iraq

Well about that... Trump sort did but in Northern Syria and his using the Kurds hatred of the Syrian gov to get away with as well.

Source

Trump has said he hopes to secure a US share of Syrian oil revenues, which is potentially a war crime

The US military has started reinforcing its positions around oil fields in eastern Syria, saying the new deployments are part of its continuing counter-terrorist mission after the killing of the Islamic State leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.

 

[nikcers]

The United States invaded Iraq. It was not justified. Once that happened, the US was in no position to be indignant about the next door neighbor of Iraq getting involved and killing US troops. To claim the US had or has any right to be indignant about it's forces getting killed by by a party they did not invade, while they were/are invaders and occupiers themselves, is madness. This is not about likeing the Iranian regime. It's about acknowledging that they had/have a legitimate interest in what goes on right next door. Western occupation of their neighbor poses a real threat to them.

Thats what you say but Iraqs neighbor paid the price. So i guess we are in a position.

 

[susano]

That should tell you to rethink your opinion.

I'm opposed to unjust wars. That's the biggest reason I supported Ron Paul. If some commie also happens to hold that position, I'm not going to change mine.