Trump endorses Mehmet Oz in PA senate race

:rolleyes: Rand Paul was in the race. He was leading at one point. Trump sucked all of the air out of the room. We don't need someone more "Trumpian than Trump." We need someone more "Ronian than Rand."

Rand was never getting elected. Sorry.

I'll happily take someone more Ronian than Rand. Let me know when you find one.
 
Sorry you're right. Trump is beloved by the Hollywood liberal crowd. They agree with him on most issues. What was I thinking.

If Oz gets elected, you'll see them turn on him because of the R after his name the same as they did Trump. It's like professional wrestling. It doesn't mean that they're not Hollywood liberal grifters.

Honestly, of all the endorsements Trump has ever given since becoming a Republican, I can't think of a single one that makes as much sense as his endorsement of Oz. After all the times he had to hold back vomit when he played along with the role he'd taken on and endorsed conservatives that he had nothing in common with, at last he has the chance to endorse someone who's so much like himself.
 
Last edited:
Sorry you're right. Trump is beloved by the Hollywood liberal crowd. They agree with him on most issues. What was I thinking.

They do agree with him on most issues--now that he's out.

the-parties-switched.jpeg


bill-clinton-happy.jpg


Being just as hypocritical is not the way to beat them.
 
Last edited:
Another piece of evidence that Trump isn't going to seek reelection. What sane person seeking the presidency would want to endorse someone who not only supports Wuhan's brutal lockdowns and saying we have to copy it here, but also someone who has direct ties to the WEF?
 
Another piece of evidence that Trump isn't going to seek reelection. What sane person seeking the presidency would want to endorse someone who not only supports Wuhan's brutal lockdowns and saying we have to copy it here, but also someone who has direct ties to the WEF?

I don't follow your logic.

Aren't those precisely the kinds of things that people who are seriously seeking the presidency always do?
 
Rand was never getting elected. Sorry.

I'll happily take someone more Ronian than Rand. Let me know when you find one.

If I understand the running theme of your posts correctly, you will also happily take someone less Ronian than Rand. Much less.
 
Oz will support forced vaccination as soon as he is in office.

[h=1]Dr Oz on CCP’s brutal lockdowns in Wuhan: “We have to copy what they did"[/h]
https://rumble.com/v10qipm-dr-oz-on...s-in-wuhan-we-have-to-copy-what-they-did.html

Will have to watch. Thanks!

---

Edit: Watched.

Yep. Not voting for Dr Oz either.

No Dr Oz, Lockdowns do not help. Copying China does not help. Do no harm, both Oz and Fauci, Do no harm.

I was gonna say "lesser of two evils", but this is not that, this is the Illusion of Choice. Either way we will find ourselves in more Medical Tyranny "to save us".

---

What this is really starting to seem like is Munchhausen Syndrome By Proxy. Munchhausen Syndrome (not by proxy) seems to be a characteristic of Victim Sociopaths. By Proxy means they feed off of hurting someone else then playing the hero.
 
Last edited:
I don't follow your logic.

Aren't those precisely the kinds of things that people who are seriously seeking the presidency always do?
What's hard to understand? Ever since Trump left office he's been doing stuff that's causing his base to jump ship, like supporting the unsafe and ineffective vaccines. He's actively ruining his reputation so that he doesn't have to run again. If he really wanted to be president again he'd be expanding his voter base instead of turning them away.
 
What's hard to understand? Ever since Trump left office he's been doing stuff that's causing his base to jump ship, like supporting the unsafe and ineffective vaccines. He's actively ruining his reputation so that he doesn't have to run again. If he really wanted to be president again he'd be expanding his voter base instead of turning them away.

Trump knows what side his bread is buttered on. When push comes to shove, the support he needs most is not from redneck ex-cons screaming profanity at NASCAR races. It's the WEF types and their allies.

In fact, I would take your question and turn it on his head. Why would Trump endorse Dr. Oz unless he *does* intend to run for president again?

And you know what? The thing about Trump's base is, they're still not really jumping ship. Most of them don't care one bit about his support for vaccines, just like they never cared about his support for single-payer healthcare, red flag laws, men using women's bathrooms, Drag Queen Story Hour, the COVID lockdowns, massive stimulus spending, massive spending on everything else, increased use of ethanol in gasoline, or anything else. He has been able to take their support for granted to this point, and there's no reason he should have to worry about losing them now. And, by the way, most of them LOVE Dr. Oz. Don't believe me? Just give Sean Hannity a listen and see what you hear.
 
Last edited:
Trump Had Every Reason to Endorse Dr. Oz
When you get a handful of lemons like we have with the Republican primary in Pennsylvania, you make lemonade. And Trump is making sweet lemonade out of them.
By Ned Ryun - April 12, 2022

The reaction by some to Donald Trump’s endorsement of Dr. Mehmet Oz in the U.S. Senate race in Pennsylvania seems a bit over the top. I mean, I get it on some levels: Oz isn’t great on the issues, isn’t a conservative rockstar (as if Pennsylvania produces any), and is an unknown commodity in electoral politics (see Trump, Donald J., circa 2015). But everyone needs to take a deep breath and understand that Oz is 10 times better than former hedgefund CEO Dave McCormick. And in Trump’s mind, maybe 50 times better.

If you’re Trump, you have political capital. The man has clout with the base and given the numbers he’s seen, he can be the kingmaker in U.S. Senate races in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Arizona, and Missouri. There are no credible MAGA candidates in the Pennsylvania Senate race; this isn’t a potential Jim DeMint versus Oz situation, so Trump really has two choices: Oz or McCormick.
...
Now consider Trump’s view of Oz. In 2016, when pundits and the press were questioning Trump’s health and ability to serve as president, Oz had him on his TV show and vouched forcefully for Trump’s good health. Even when Oz was baited by the leftist press to attack Trump, he refused. That kind of loyalty goes a long way with Trump.

Now look at McCormick. He’s spent decades being very consistent on a whole host of fronts, and not in a good way. Let’s start with his pro-China stance. As the president and later CEO of Bridgewater, McCormick loved doing business with China. He was there for over a dozen years and in case you didn’t know, Bridgewater has been managing Chinese state money since 1993, including Beijing’s sovereign wealth fund. In short, Bridgewater is in bed with the Chinese Communist Party. Under McCormick’s leadership, Bridgewater didn’t shy away from doing business with the Chinese Communists. In fact, McCormick expanded Bridgewater’s business in China, even helping raise over $1 billion for a private fund in China as late as November 2021.

Beyond China, McCormick is your typical open borders, pro-amnesty, Chamber of Commerce type of Republican. He’s also the typical neocon who hasn’t seen a war he doesn’t like. Even worse, he’s bought into the lie of January 6. When asked about it by Bloomberg weeks after the incident, in the context of whether the GOP should jettison Trumpism, McCormick replied, “We shouldn’t embrace the divisiveness of the last four years” of which “Trump bears a great responsibility.” Evidently, McCormick missed the divisiveness caused by the Russian collusion hoax, Ukrainian quid pro quo, and a host of other nonstop attacks by administrative state actors and corporate propagandists.

Throw on top of the crap cake that is McCormick the icing of his new wife, globalist Dina Powell, and you’re telling me Trump isn’t going to endorse his opponent? Come on. Of course Trump is going to endorse Oz.
...
More: https://amgreatness.com/2022/04/12/trump-had-every-reason-to-endorse-dr-oz/
 
Laura Ingraham Calls Out Trump’s Endorsement Of Dr. Oz As A ‘Mistake’



Note: Kellyanne Conway supports Dave McCormick. Watch till the end, Ingraham tries to cut her off when she starts promoting McCormick.
 
Last edited:
Go to the 31:25 mark to see an interview with Dr. Oz:


https://rumble.com/v10oc7s-hannity-41122-full-show-fox-breaking-news-april-11-2022.html
 
If Oz gets elected, you'll see them turn on him because of the R after his name the same as they did Trump. It's like professional wrestling. It doesn't mean that they're not Hollywood liberal grifters.

True. The left is notorious for having it out for Republicans like Senator Murkowski and Senator Romney. I don't see why they would treat Oz any better.

Honestly, of all the endorsements Trump has ever given since becoming a Republican, I can't think of a single one that makes as much sense as his endorsement of Oz. After all the times he had to hold back vomit when he played along with the role he'd taken on and endorsed conservatives that he had nothing in common with, at last he has the chance to endorse someone who's so much like himself.

Nailed it. Oz is a hardliner on immigration, trade and is legendary for his trolling and demonizing of the media. He is like Trump in every conceivable way.
 
If I understand the running theme of your posts correctly, you will also happily take someone less Ronian than Rand. Much less.

Yes, I will take someone less Ronian than Rand. I don't live in libertarian fantasy land where Ron Paul clones are electable at anything other than a local level.
 
Back
Top