Rand Paul was in the race. He was leading at one point. Trump sucked all of the air out of the room. We don't need someone more "Trumpian than Trump." We need someone more "Ronian than Rand."
Take a minute to enjoy the irony of this post.
Sorry you're right. Trump is beloved by the Hollywood liberal crowd. They agree with him on most issues. What was I thinking.
Sorry you're right. Trump is beloved by the Hollywood liberal crowd. They agree with him on most issues. What was I thinking.
Another piece of evidence that Trump isn't going to seek reelection. What sane person seeking the presidency would want to endorse someone who not only supports Wuhan's brutal lockdowns and saying we have to copy it here, but also someone who has direct ties to the WEF?
I don't follow your logic.
Aren't those precisely the kinds of things that people who are seriously seeking the presidency always do?
Rand was never getting elected. Sorry.
Rand was never getting elected. Sorry.
I'll happily take someone more Ronian than Rand. Let me know when you find one.
Oz will support forced vaccination as soon as he is in office.
[h=1]Dr Oz on CCP’s brutal lockdowns in Wuhan: “We have to copy what they did"[/h]
https://rumble.com/v10qipm-dr-oz-on...s-in-wuhan-we-have-to-copy-what-they-did.html
Oz will support forced vaccination as soon as he is in office.
Dr Oz on CCP’s brutal lockdowns in Wuhan: “We have to copy what they did"
https://rumble.com/v10qipm-dr-oz-on...s-in-wuhan-we-have-to-copy-what-they-did.html
What's hard to understand? Ever since Trump left office he's been doing stuff that's causing his base to jump ship, like supporting the unsafe and ineffective vaccines. He's actively ruining his reputation so that he doesn't have to run again. If he really wanted to be president again he'd be expanding his voter base instead of turning them away.I don't follow your logic.
Aren't those precisely the kinds of things that people who are seriously seeking the presidency always do?
What's hard to understand? Ever since Trump left office he's been doing stuff that's causing his base to jump ship, like supporting the unsafe and ineffective vaccines. He's actively ruining his reputation so that he doesn't have to run again. If he really wanted to be president again he'd be expanding his voter base instead of turning them away.
We've gone from...
...to, "I'm not a conservative but I play one on TV."
The reaction by some to Donald Trump’s endorsement of Dr. Mehmet Oz in the U.S. Senate race in Pennsylvania seems a bit over the top. I mean, I get it on some levels: Oz isn’t great on the issues, isn’t a conservative rockstar (as if Pennsylvania produces any), and is an unknown commodity in electoral politics (see Trump, Donald J., circa 2015). But everyone needs to take a deep breath and understand that Oz is 10 times better than former hedgefund CEO Dave McCormick. And in Trump’s mind, maybe 50 times better.
If you’re Trump, you have political capital. The man has clout with the base and given the numbers he’s seen, he can be the kingmaker in U.S. Senate races in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Arizona, and Missouri. There are no credible MAGA candidates in the Pennsylvania Senate race; this isn’t a potential Jim DeMint versus Oz situation, so Trump really has two choices: Oz or McCormick.
...
Now consider Trump’s view of Oz. In 2016, when pundits and the press were questioning Trump’s health and ability to serve as president, Oz had him on his TV show and vouched forcefully for Trump’s good health. Even when Oz was baited by the leftist press to attack Trump, he refused. That kind of loyalty goes a long way with Trump.
Now look at McCormick. He’s spent decades being very consistent on a whole host of fronts, and not in a good way. Let’s start with his pro-China stance. As the president and later CEO of Bridgewater, McCormick loved doing business with China. He was there for over a dozen years and in case you didn’t know, Bridgewater has been managing Chinese state money since 1993, including Beijing’s sovereign wealth fund. In short, Bridgewater is in bed with the Chinese Communist Party. Under McCormick’s leadership, Bridgewater didn’t shy away from doing business with the Chinese Communists. In fact, McCormick expanded Bridgewater’s business in China, even helping raise over $1 billion for a private fund in China as late as November 2021.
Beyond China, McCormick is your typical open borders, pro-amnesty, Chamber of Commerce type of Republican. He’s also the typical neocon who hasn’t seen a war he doesn’t like. Even worse, he’s bought into the lie of January 6. When asked about it by Bloomberg weeks after the incident, in the context of whether the GOP should jettison Trumpism, McCormick replied, “We shouldn’t embrace the divisiveness of the last four years” of which “Trump bears a great responsibility.” Evidently, McCormick missed the divisiveness caused by the Russian collusion hoax, Ukrainian quid pro quo, and a host of other nonstop attacks by administrative state actors and corporate propagandists.
Throw on top of the crap cake that is McCormick the icing of his new wife, globalist Dina Powell, and you’re telling me Trump isn’t going to endorse his opponent? Come on. Of course Trump is going to endorse Oz.
...
More: https://amgreatness.com/2022/04/12/trump-had-every-reason-to-endorse-dr-oz/
If Oz gets elected, you'll see them turn on him because of the R after his name the same as they did Trump. It's like professional wrestling. It doesn't mean that they're not Hollywood liberal grifters.
Honestly, of all the endorsements Trump has ever given since becoming a Republican, I can't think of a single one that makes as much sense as his endorsement of Oz. After all the times he had to hold back vomit when he played along with the role he'd taken on and endorsed conservatives that he had nothing in common with, at last he has the chance to endorse someone who's so much like himself.
They do agree with him on most issues--now that he's out.
If I understand the running theme of your posts correctly, you will also happily take someone less Ronian than Rand. Much less.