Trump campaign "facing an emergency goal of $100,000"

The Dems pretty much announced what they were going to do over a month ago, and Trump's campaign waits until now.

Report: Dems to Hit Trump With $20 Million in Negative Ads Before Convention

BTW, the $100K is a lowball figure. They want $1M or more, so Trump can go around the next week or so and say he asked for $100K and got so much more, because the people love him.


As opposed to Ron, who doesn't even have to ask for money but people love him so much they set up a moneybomb and bring in MILLIONS. Oh and afterwards, he doesn't brag about how much people love him.

THAT is why I love Ron. :p Screw Trump, he's a phony.
 
As opposed to Ron, who doesn't even have to ask for money but people love him so much they set up a moneybomb and bring in MILLIONS. Oh and afterwards, he doesn't brag about how much people love him.

THAT is why I love Ron. :p Screw Trump, he's a phony.

Did Ron take over republican party? I love Ron and I like Trump. But comparing them is useless they have very different goals and approaches.
 
Last edited:
Did Ron take over republican party? I love Ron and I like Trump. But comparing them is useless they have very different goals and approaches.

Because in a comparison to Ron Paul, this is Trump:
Emperors_New_Clothes.jpg
 
Did Ron take over republican party? I love Ron and I like Trump. But comparing them is useless they have very different goals and approaches.

I don't like Trump, never have, probably never will. I don't consider him as a person with an authentic personality. Which is something that helps me determine how much I value people. He simply doesn't have an authentic personality, it's dictated by the people around him. He might have become successful with it but someone who's become successful without an authentic personality is not my kind of person, not someone I can support.

Ron certainly did not take over the Republican party but in a way he did create the opportunity for Trump to run. Not that I'm completely excited by that fact but I won't deny it. I'm too honest for that. Trump certainly took over the Republican party in a much more successful way than Ron. However, the question is, what is his goal ?

In my opinion ? It's not to grow the Republican party. It's to grow his personal wealth/influence. I do not believe he gives a flying fuck about the Republican party. I do not give many fucks about the Republican party either, however, as long as the Democrat party is not wrecked in a similar way, it is still the best vehicle we have to run our candidates. I still can't come to the conclusion that there is anything positive about Trump. Sorry for that.

I can understand, in a way, why people like Trump, I like the non-PC aspect but I don't like the message. It's not a message of inclusion, it's a message of division. Which is short term thinking, not long term. I don't like that. Ron didn't want to be president, I don't know if Trump actually wants to be president. If he does however, it's for all the wrong reasons.
 
Well look at it this way. If Ron would have succeeded we would be dealing with the same problems Trump is dealing with. Dried up funding, leaders contradicting him and non stop racism baiting.

So the party would not grow under Ron either. The grow the party argument was used by us to get concessions from republicans and they told us to go f our selves.

It all comes down to do you want to win or stand for something? If you want to win then you will listen to all the don't rock the boat people and all the emotion trolls from the left.

It is better to lose and be done with it rather than every four years throwing away all the money and energy you have only to lose. Trump said if he does not win he will consider it a huge waste of time. That is how I felt in 2008.
 
Well look at it this way. If Ron would have succeeded we would be dealing with the same problems Trump is dealing with. Dried up funding, leaders contradicting him and non stop racism baiting.

So the party would not grow under Ron either. The grow the party argument was used by us to get concessions from republicans and they told us to go f our selves.

It all comes down to do you want to win or stand for something? If you want to win then you will listen to all the don't rock the boat people and all the emotion trolls from the left.

It is better to lose and be done with it rather than every four years throwing away all the money and energy you have only to lose. Trump said if he does not win he will consider it a huge waste of time. That is how I felt in 2008.

I'm pretty sure that if Ron had won the nomination and asked for $100k the grassroots would have bombed him with $5 million in a single day.
 

How so?

Winning the nomination != taking over the party

When Trump loses in November, will there be any lasting impact he made on the party? What in the party will resemble him in any way, shape, or form afterwards? Will his "ideas" influence anything? Will others take up his mantle and run as Trump-republicans? Will state parties be taken over by the Trumpkins? Will he have encouraged anyone to get active?

Has he won the nomination, taken over the Republican party, or both?
 
I don't care to get bogged down in technicalities.

I will say what I think after reading your post. I personally don't like voting and think it is a waste of time. I heard Trump say something like if he loses he is going to think this is a waste of time. So yeah I hope we all gtfo of politics if we lose.
 
How so?

Winning the nomination != taking over the party

When Trump loses in November, will there be any lasting impact he made on the party? What in the party will resemble him in any way, shape, or form afterwards? Will his "ideas" influence anything? Will others take up his mantle and run as Trump-republicans? Will state parties be taken over by the Trumpkins? Will he have encouraged anyone to get active?

Has he won the nomination, taken over the Republican party, or both?

LOL those are just technicalities. Only SJW and open border progressives care about things like that.
 
A vote for Gary Johnson is a vote for Hillary.

You don't get it. A vote for Johnson is a vote for Hillary.

Clinton and Trump both suck, it really doesn't matter which one wins. These are the two worst candidates for potus in my lifetime.

A vote for Johnson is maybe a chance at a viable third party.



The "billionaire" can't afford a $100k tv ad? :rolleyes:
 
Clinton and Trump both suck, it really doesn't matter which one wins. These are the two worst candidates for potus in my lifetime.

A vote for Johnson is maybe a chance at a viable third party.



The "billionaire" can't afford a $100k tv ad? :rolleyes:

To be fair to him, he also said that he has spent $50 m of his own money on the campaign. The point is that his so called supporters can donate the 100k he needs
 
To be fair to him, he also said that he has spent $50 m of his own money on the campaign. The point is that his so called supporters can donate the 100k he needs

That's a lot of red trucker hats. I'd like to see an itemized list of this 50 million in expenditures.
 
Trump got $1.5 billion worth of free media exposure in 2015. You don't need to raise $100m when you're doing that. It's all about using other people's money, and the best way is to not even have to put your hands on it.
 
That's a lot of red trucker hats. I'd like to see an itemized list of this 50 million in expenditures.

An expenditure list would simply reveal all the money spent on fake crowds. Thus, we'll never see such a list.
 
When Trump loses in November, will there be any lasting impact he made on the party? What in the party will resemble him in any way, shape, or form afterwards? Will his "ideas" influence anything? Will others take up his mantle and run as Trump-republicans? Will state parties be taken over by the Trumpkins? Will he have encouraged anyone to get active?

Yes. Yes. & Yes.

Cruz & others have been stealing Trump ideas whether it is Cruz or Trump people controlling the party. The only issues they have with Trump are abortion, guns & statesmanlike ability.
 
An expenditure list would simply reveal all the money spent on fake crowds. Thus, we'll never see such a list.

Paul's crowds were 100% real & Trump's crowds were 1% real. Trump is part of a big conspiracy to pay 1000's of people to show up; as well as a conspiracy to tell 80 year old lunatics to throw haymakers at black lives matter, while not actually delivering a damaging punch.
 
An expenditure list would simply reveal all the money spent on fake crowds. Thus, we'll never see such a list.

25% of Donald Trump’s political spending goes to his own companies

“It’s very possible that I could be the first presidential candidate to run and make money on it,” Donald Trump told Fortune in 2000, during his first abortive run for president.

He was referring to a $1 million motivational speaking deal he got from Tony Robbins that he timed to coincide with his campaign stops. Then, he didn’t dominate the headlines—apparently the Clinton-Bush-Gore psychodrama was more compelling—and Trump’s greatest accomplishment was winning the Reform party nomination in California with a scant 15,311 votes. (His bon mots haven’t changed much—Fortune refers to “his usual critiques of Pat Buchanan (‘a Hitler lover’), Bill Bradley (‘a total disaster’), George W. Bush (‘no Einstein’), Fidel Castro (‘a bad guy’), North Korea (‘run by some very bad people’), and Russia (‘totally mixed up’).”)

This time around, as the leading candidate for the Republican nomination, he operates on a more rarified and lucrative plane: Trump’s companies have already earned $1.4 million from his campaign.

The billionaire builder often argues that his wealth guarantees his political independence, and describes his campaign as “self-funding.” That’s no longer true: While he was the main source of campaign funds during the early part of his run, the most recent financial disclosures through the end of September 2015, show Trump put less money into his campaign than his donors—and he stands to profit in particular from their backing.
Follow the money

Trump loaned his campaign just over $1.8 million during the second quarter of this year, but as of Oct 1. his campaign had spent $5.4 million. Most of the balance, $3.9 million, came from donors. Some contributions are “unsolicited,” in Trump’s words, but the rest comes from buying merchandise or clicking on the large “donate” buttons on his website. As of Trump’s last filing, there was only $250,000 left in the bank to run the the campaign and pay off the loan he made to himself, though he has surely raised more money since then.

Meanwhile, Trump’s various companies have contributed some $105,000 worth of services, including salaries for Trump’s pre-existing staff, including his feisty bodyguard, and, less explicably but more expensively, rent paid to his to luxury condo buildings in the heart of Manhattan: Trump Plaza and Trump Central Park South.

His campaign has also paid $160,000 to rent space at various Trump-owned buildings, including Trump Tower on 5th Ave. The campaign’s largest expenditure is $1.2 million to the private jet company that Trump owns in order to shuttle him around the US. All told, his campaign has paid Trump-owned entities $1.4 million, a little more than a quarter of all its spending.

Trump’s campaign did not respond to queries about how the billionaire decides between donating his company’s services to his campaign or using donor money to pay for them.

...
http://qz.com/582641/25-of-donald-trumps-political-spending-goes-to-his-own-companies/
 
Back
Top