Trump holds rally in Wildwood NJ - Over 100,000 in attendance

[Anti Federalist]

Posted without comment, other than to say, I know the area well, and that crowd estimate seems correct based on what I am seeing.

Trump Pulls Enormous Crowd for New Jersey Rally; Official Estimate Updated to More than 100,000

https://www.breitbart.com/2024-elec...-new-jersey-rally-estimates-in-tens-of-1000s/

NICK GILBERTSON 11 May 2024

An enormous crowd descended upon Wildwood, New Jersey, on Saturday for former President Donald Trump’s rally in the traditionally Democrat state, and the official estimate of spectators in attendance was updated after the event to more than 100,000 attendees.

A senior Trump campaign aide told Breitbart News shortly before the rally that estimates were that 80,000 were in attendance–but clearly that underestimated the numbers.

Lisa Fagan, the spokesperson for the city of Wildwood, told the Associated Press the official estimate was between 80,000 and 100,000 rally-goers in attendance to see Trump.

A Trump campaign source told Breitbart News that after the event began, Fagan updated her official estimate to begin telling people there were more than 100,000 people there to see Trump.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1789317717356364017

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

Those damned Soros funded gatherings are getting irritating.

 

[PAF]

This just shows:

As upset as the people are about "voter fraud", and knowing that both candidates are preapproved and preselected by TPTB, people still flock to the chosen ones like flies on fresh sh|t.

And people get mad at me for not voting

Hey [MENTION=3169]Anti Federalist[/MENTION], this also goes to show it's the will of the sheeple

It's not the presidency that matters so much, as it is how much people are willing to put up with, and just to support a letter of the alphabet after a name.

I'll bet those 100,000 folks stay as far away from the new FreedomWorks as they possibly can.

 

[acptulsa]

No, man. They've had e-effing-nuff, but they've been brainwashed into believing that they only have two viable options. They could be jolted into abandoning both these criminals, but the lever that could turn them against Trump is his jab, and nobody wants to talk (or even think) about that for a variety of personal and very sad reasons.

It's a well designed psyop, man. Don't underestimate the enemy.

Trump gets crowds because the status quo won't do. The fact that Trump is also the status quo is the elephant in the room which is too horrible for these crowds to contemplate.

Trump is the mural Wile E. Coyote paints on a solid granite mountain, the picture of a smooth road across the sunny landscape, to trap the roadrunner. And these people are just praying they can do like the roadrunner and walk down that sunny road, just as if it were real. And if Biden were then to charge at that mural and run smack into the granite wall, that would just be perfect.

 

[helenpaul]

No, man. They've had e-effing-nuff, but they've been brainwashed into believing that they only have two viable options. They could be jolted into abandoning both these criminals, but the lever that could turn them against Trump is his jab, and nobody wants to talk (or even think) about that for a variety of personal and very sad reasons.

It's a well designed psyop, man. Don't underestimate the enemy.

Trump gets crowds because the status quo won't do. The fact that Trump is also the status quo is the elephant in the room which is too horrible for these crowds to contemplate.

Trump is the mural Wile E. Coyote paints on a solid granite mountain, the picture of a smooth road across the sunny landscape, to trap the roadrunner. And these people are just praying they can do like the roadrunner and walk down that sunny road, just as if it were real. And if Biden were then to charge at that mural and run smack into the granite wall, that would just be perfect.

True, and the people he is considering for VP, rubio, burgum, haley, and scott are all quite swampy. Burgum is about as anti freedom as you get for a republican

 

[Pauls' Revere]

This just shows:

As upset as the people are about "voter fraud", and knowing that both candidates are preapproved and preselected by TPTB, people still flock to the chosen ones like flies on fresh sh|t.

And people get mad at me for not voting.

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to PAF again.

 

[oyarde]

2020 says 72 percent turnout biden by 16 percent, trump winning 7 counties , biden 14, 2.6 milion to 1.8 million w/ two counties flipping from GOP to dem. Considering weapons laws etc , NJ one of top most UnAmerocan states in union. Gonna take 2 1/2 million in NJ to do anyting, biden only up 2 1/2 percent over typical dem vote

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

Trump is going to announce Swordsmyth for VP this week.

 

[vita3]

Trump is going to announce Swordsmyth for VP this week.

Blind Loyalty finally pays off

 

[Mordan]

flawed candidate used to channel the anger of the people,

1984 democracy.

 

[jmdrake]

True, and the people he is considering for VP, rubio, burgum, haley, and scott are all quite swampy. Burgum is about as anti freedom as you get for a republican

I like Tim Scott. He actually put forward a solid police reform bill in 2020.

 

[PAF]

I like Tim Scott. He actually put forward a solid police reform bill in 2020.

Yikes

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?555800-Tim-Scott-On-The-Record

 

[jmdrake]

Yikes

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?555800-Tim-Scott-On-The-Record

Police reform is VERY important to me. There are things I don't like about RFK JR as well. Selective outrage much?

Edit: I'm 100% certain that if RFK Jr. had ever been elected to the House or Senate there'd be an RFK Jr on the record thread with a lot of "bad" votes.

 

[PAF]

Police reform is VERY important to me. There are things I don't like about RFK JR as well. Selective outrage much?

Edit: I'm 100% certain that if RFK Jr. had ever been elected to the House or Senate there'd be an RFK Jr on the record thread with a lot of "bad" votes.

No doubt. What part don't you get that I don't vote?


[Edit] And you don't see Scott's votes in his Record as supporting the Police-State?

 

[helenpaul]

I like Tim Scott. He actually put forward a solid police reform bill in 2020.

I think he is a swampy lightweight and would lose Trump votes. Trumps best bet would be Glen Youngkin

 

[jmdrake]

No doubt. What part don't you get that I don't vote?


[Edit] And you don't see Scott's votes in his Record as supporting the Police-State?

Only 3 of the votes you listed have arguably anything to do with policing and those are all federal issues. The young airmen that just got gunned down by local cops going to the wrong house was not killed by the FBI. I agree the FBI / ATF etc has done some garbage (@Anti Federalist brings up Waco and I agree), none of the votes in your list are about what the how the feds should or should not conduct raids. It's apples and oranges. Tim Scott's police reform bill was a good step forward period!

I think he is a swampy lightweight and would lose Trump votes. Trumps best bet would be Glen Youngkin

I could care less whether or not Trump wins in November. But Tim Scott might shore up the 20% of black voters who are right now thinking about voting for Trump. The people who voted Trump / Pence in 2016 would vote Trump / Scott in 2020.

 

[Snowball]

I think Trump would pick Ben Carson over Tim Scott if he wanted a colored man on the ticket.
Ben was already in his cabinet and is widely respected.

 

[PAF]

Only 3 of the votes you listed have arguably anything to do with policing and those are all federal issues. The young airmen that just got gunned down by local cops going to the wrong house was not killed by the FBI. I agree the FBI / ATF etc has done some garbage (@Anti Federalist brings up Waco and I agree), none of the votes in your list are about what the how the feds should or should not conduct raids. It's apples and oranges. Tim Scott's police reform bill was a good step forward period!



I could care less whether or not Trump wins in November. But Tim Scott might shore up the 20% of black voters who are right now thinking about voting for Trump. The people who voted Trump / Pence in 2016 would vote Trump / Scott in 2020.

I’m not interested in trading good votes for bad votes. That is exactly what got us into this stinking mess in the first place, and that mentality certainly will not get us out of it.

The bolded is a contradiction. Well, maybe not a contradiction: You don’t care if Trump wins, but you certainly want to strategize and sure up votes for Trump with Scott. Sorry, that’s a double no for me.

 

[jmdrake]

I’m not interested in trading good votes for bad votes. That is exactly what got us into this stinking mess in the first place, and that mentality certainly will not get us out of it.

The bolded is a contradiction. Well, maybe not a contradiction: You don’t care if Trump wins, but you certainly want to strategize and sure up votes for Trump with Scott. Sorry, that’s a double no for me.

Don't put words in my mouth. I was responding to someone else who claimed that a different candidate would better help Trump win. You admit that RFK Jr. would probably have a horrible voting record if he was in congress, but you like his candidacy because of some of the issues he would highlight. Well, police reform is an important issue to me. I would love to see Kamala Harris have to debate Tim Scott and explain why the "progressive prosecutor" filibustered police reform only to be part of the Biden administration that would later push for the same things. FFS someone should be able to say "I like X" and "X" not be RFK Jr without you trying to give that person the third degree.

 

[PAF]

Don't put words in my mouth. I was responding to someone else who claimed that a different candidate would better help Trump win. You admit that RFK Jr. would probably have a horrible voting record if he was in congress, but you like his candidacy because of some of the issues he would highlight. Well, police reform is an important issue to me. I would love to see Kamala Harris have to debate Tim Scott and explain why the "progressive prosecutor" filibustered police reform only to be part of the Biden administration that would later push for the same things. FFS someone should be able to say "I like X" and "X" not be RFK Jr without you trying to give that person the third degree.

Oops, I missed that you were responding to helenpaul. But it remains true that you do like Scott. I haven't looked into his "police reform" [maybe it's great, I don't know], much like I don't care about Mike Kelly's good votes on a couple of issue but pathetic-horrible on the rest.

Democrats didn't listen to reason when I tried to speak with them. When RFK brought up Captured Agencies, Surveillance State and a couple of others including the vax, at least that gave me an in-road, for whatever that is worth [probably nothing in the grand scheme]. But make no mistake, I would never vote him, nor would I suggest others to either. If he did have a Congressional/Senate Record scoring below 90%, I'd dump support of him, even his good talking points, faster than in a hurry.