Trump attacks protections for immigrants from ‘shithole’ countries in Oval Office meeting

[johnwk]

And President Tump's ****hole question remains unanswered!

It is absolutely hilarious to see how our communist/socialist/progressive crowd's heads are exploding over a legitimate question.


Trump merely asked a legitimate question. The question as reported being: “Why are we having all these people from ******** countries come here?”



So, tell us, why are we allowing the poverty stricken, poorly educated low and unskilled populations of poverty stricken nations come here? It is utter insanity to do so!


JWK





American citizens are sick and tired of being made into tax-slaves to finance a maternity ward for the poverty stricken populations of other countries who invade America’s borders to give birth.

 

[Swordsmyth]

There are very few places we should accept more than a trickle of immigrants from.
And very many we should take none from.

 

[Jamesiv1]

Trump may be the greatest President in the history of Presidents.

i luv him more and more lol

 

[AuH20]

The term Racist has been mangled into an ash heap of ineffectiveness, thanks to Trump. He deserves a medal for exposing these fools. I just wish our foreign policy would take a clue from the immigration hawk side. Start following the prime directive from Star Trek. I don't want to interfere in their backward countries and by the same token, I don't want large numbers here.

 

[kpitcher]

Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free

 

[AuH20]

Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free

and take away one's remaining rights and property.

 

[timosman]

The term Racist has been mangled into an ash heap of ineffectiveness, thanks to Trump. He deserves a medal for exposing these fools. I just wish our foreign policy would take a clue from the immigration hawk side. Start following the prime directive from Star Trek. I don't want to interfere in their backward countries and by the same token, I don't want large numbers here.

In other words, is it OK not give a fuck about something outside our borders?

 

[Anti Federalist]

There are very few places we should accept more than a trickle of immigrants from.
And very many we should take none from.

None.

That way there can be no accusations of racism or favoritism.

Fuck off back to where you came from, country's full.

We got enough troubles.

 

[AuH20]

In other words, is it OK not give a $#@! about something outside our borders?

 

[r3volution 3.0]

and take away one's remaining rights and property.

Yea!

Taking away our rights is our job.

 

[Anti Federalist]

The larger question is:

Why were you "negotiating" with the likes of Grahamcracker and Dustbin on this issue?

 

[Origanalist]

In other words, is it OK not give a fuck about something outside our borders?

Someone needs to alert the Pentagon about this.

 

[Origanalist]

I hereby nominate this for best thread title of 2018. It's never to early to start.

 

[kahless]

Feinstein: Trump trying to promote a 'homogenous, white society'
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/...-trying-to-promote-a-homogenous-white-society

Gasp, oh noooes oh the humanity, we can't have too many whites now can we.

The amount of self hating white brainwashing is astounding.

 

[johnwk]

Give me your tired, your poor . . . BS

Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free

Just for the record, Emma Lazarus, who wrote the words which appear on the Statute of Liberty was a well-known socialist, and the “poem” which she wrote was suggested to be used to raise funds to build the statue’s pedestal.

Additionally, immigrants coming to America who passed the statute on their way to Elis Island were not granted entry into the United States for a number of reasons. One reason to be rejected was the likelihood of becoming a ward of the state and a public burden, and on this ground many were refused entry!


Is it not reasonable for American Citizens to reject being made into tax slaves to support the economic needs of millions upon millions of foreigners who have entered our country illegally and legally?

I get the distinct impression that many of our politicians, like Senator Schumer, have more compassion for those who have entered ourcountry illegally than they do for American Citizens who are suffering the devastating consequences of illegal and legal immigration. And they have more compassion for them for a nefarious reason ___ creating a massive voting block which i9s dependent upon government cheese.

And what was our Founder’s thinking with regard to immigration?

Let us recall what Representative BURKE says during our Nations` first debate on a RULE OF NATURALIZATION, FEB. 3RD, 1790

Mr. BURKE thought it of importance to fill the country with useful men, such as farmers, mechanics, and manufacturers, and, therefore, would hold out every encouragement to them to emigrate to America. This class he would receive on liberal terms; and he was satisfied there would be room enough for them, and for their posterity, for five hundred years to come. There was another class of men, whom he did not think useful, and he did not care what impediments were thrown in their way; such as your European merchants, and factors of merchants, who come with a view of remaining so long as will enable them to acquire a fortune, and then they will leave the country, and carry off all their property with them. These people injure us more than they do us good, and, except in this last sentiment, I can compare them to nothing but leeches. They stick to us until they get their fill of our best blood, and then they fall off and leave us. I look upon the privilege of an American citizen to be an honorable one, and it ought not to be thrown away upon such people. There is another class also that I would interdict, that is, the convicts and criminals which they pour out of British jails. I wish sincerely some mode could be adopted to prevent the importation of such; but that, perhaps, is not in our power; the introduction of them ought to be considered as a high misdemeanor.

JWK



American citizens are sick and tired of being made into tax slaves and forced to finance the personal economic needs of millions of foreigners who have invaded America’s borders.

 

[enhanced_deficit]

Trump attacks protections for immigrants from ‘$#@!hole’ countries in Oval Office meeting

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...c0725c-f711-11e7-91af-31ac729add94_story.html

To be fair, Trump has been attacked by media ruthlessly too over this. He rarely gets a break from MSM.

Media attacks Trump over alleged ‘$#@!hole’ comments

MSNBC host goes low, dredges up Trump father's arrest at KKK meeting, grandfather brothel/hote

 

[Superfluous Man]

Well , did they have an answer on how accepting people from a $#@!hole improves life for american taxpayers ?

Tons of ways.

But that's really beside the point, because it's none of the president's business if they do or not. His job is to stay out of the way and let us all live as we please as long as we aren't aggressing against anyone else. If I want to welcome into my home people from countries that he considers shitholes, he can wonder all he wants why I would do that, but he has no business interfering.

 

[Superfluous Man]

It is absolutely hilarious to see how our communist/socialist/progressive crowd's heads are exploding over a legitimate question.

You have it backwards. Immigration restriction always has been and remains one of the hallmarks of socialism and progressivism.

As Bernie Sanders, who supports immigration restriction, accurately observed. It's we libertarian Koch Brother types who support free movement of people across borders. And of course Trump's own socialist leanings are no secret.

 

[timosman]

Tons of ways.

Care to mention one?

 

[FSP-Rebel]