Toxic femininity

IMG_8493.jpeg
 
jmdrake said:
... In juvenile corrections facilities, female staff are also a much more significant threat than male staff; more than nine in ten juveniles who reported staff sexual victimization were abused by a woman...
Click to expand...

I normally don't comment on this stuff because it's rarely edifying, but I'll take this opportunity to break it down. Buckle up, because you're about to get some truth-download...

First, most men are sexually selfish, especially young and inexperienced men. This means that they just "go for it" in bed. As a result of being inconsiderate of their partner, their partner is left sexually unsatisfied. She may keep quiet about it, or she might complain but, either way, she generally doesn't "get off", certainly nowhere near the frequency that he does. After a while, she loses a lot of the interest she originally had in sexual intimacy because it's purely an act of service, there is little or no enjoyment in it for herself, except by proxy. Proxy-pleasure is still pleasure, but it's like eating tasteless food. It's just something you do, it's not something you enjoy in itself.

As a result of this, married people and long-term couples report that "men are more interested in sex than women" and this becomes a widespread false-belief. The more traditional a society is, the more widespread is this false-belief, because the less challenged male selfishness in bed is.

As a result of this, women are attributed sexual trust that would not be attributed to men. This includes with small children and other situations where there is a potential for sexual abuse or misconduct. When we see headline statistics like the above quote, this is seen as terribly shocking -- aren't women just sexual primroses who are more interested in social functions than in the bedroom? In reality, the female mind is arguably more sexually twisted than the male mind. Statistics like "90% of juveniles who report sexual victimization are abused by a woman" is a manifestation of this reality that is only jarring to us because of the widespread false-belief in the general sexual-apathy of women, which flows from the sequence of cause-and-effect I described above. In short, women are sexual freaks, no matter what appearance they put on to the contrary, even in private.

I'm not proposing any solutions here, just throwing some light on the problem.
 
Last edited:
devil21 said:
I didn't say it would be easy. Lordy lordy I know it's not. I see it constantly. But the alternative eventually is Meta headsets, AI girlfriends and Demolition Man.
Click to expand...

Don't blame the victim. While a lot of incels are just horrible people, the reality is that this generation is being systematically castrated by forces they cannot even imagine. The omnipotent, inflationary warfare state has harnessed the entirety of its war-propaganda resources, including entire desert-floors' worth of GPU servers running the most advanced AI algorithms, to tell this generation that they will not, must not and cannot form families and reproduce. It's not just a question of whether it's "easy", as though the problem is just that young men need to suck it up and say Hi to a girl for once. Some of them do, sure. But that's not what's really at stake. The issue is far, far more extensive than that. And blaming the victim is just carrying water for the depop Agenda.
 
I mowed the lawn today, and after doing so I sat down and had a cold adult beverage

The day was really quite beautiful, and the drink facilitated some deep thinking.

My wife walked by and asked me what I was doing, and I said, "Nothing."

The reason I said "nothing" instead of saying "just thinking" is because she then would have asked, "About what?"

At that point I would have had to explain that men are deep thinkers about various topics, which would lead to other questions.

Finally, I pondered an age old question: Is giving birth more painful than getting kicked in the nuts?

Women always maintain that giving birth is way more painful than a guy getting kicked in the nuts, but how could they know?

Well, after another drink, and some more heavy deductive thinking, I have come up with an answer to that question.

Getting kicked in the nuts is more painful than having a baby, and even though I obviously couldn't really know, here is the reason for my conclusion:

A year or so after giving birth, a woman will often say, "It might be nice to have another child."

But you never hear a guy say, "You know, I think I would like another kick in the nuts."

I rest my case.

Time for another drink.

Then maybe a nap.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

ClaytonB
Female modesty: first step to ending toxic femininity
Replies
2
Views
36
ClaytonB
ClaytonB
jmdrake
The white trash version of Ghislane Maxwell gets 100 years
Replies
2
Views
111
TheTexan
TheTexan
jmdrake
Ghislaine Maxwell clears Trump, Clinton and all the other elites.
Replies
15
Views
426
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
Anti Federalist
Woman stabbed in the throat in Grand Central station: "No one would help"
Replies
5
Views
3K
Anti Federalist
Anti Federalist
jmdrake
Ex-US soldier gets consecutive life sentences for killing couple to fund Venezuela mercenary fighting plans
2
Replies
31
Views
147
jmdrake
jmdrake
Back
Top