The Russia-Ukraine War

F* Nazi’s

That is what Russia is doing..

it is sad that a bunch of football hooligans was radicalized with Nazi Ideology,, and armed with Heavy Weapons to cause so much destruction..

and the idea that the Ukraine could Defeat Russia was completely delusional from the start.
 
To this point, most if not every bridge that has been blown up so far was blown up by the Ukrainians.

Russia could easily (very easily) blow up every bridge that Ukraine is using to move weapons to the front line -- but they don't.

If Russia runs low on patience they may start blowing up bridges but they haven't yet.


It looks like Ukraine used U.S. supplied HIMARS systems and blew up 3 bridges that cross the Dnipro River near Kherson to stop supplies getting to Russian troops that are now located on the western side of that river. I read the Russians installed a couple pontoon bridges and ferries to cross the river, however, i wonder how much supplies can make it to the Russian troops that are located there. It seems they are isolated and very vulnerable in their current location. What is your take on this?
 
and the idea that the Ukraine could Defeat Russia was completely delusional from the start.

Yep, whatever press that lied to us about Ukraine “winning” should be taken off air
 
and the idea that the Ukraine could Defeat Russia was completely delusional from the start.

Yep, whatever press that lied to us about Ukraine “winning” should be taken off air

Yeah well,,
I have posts,,and I believe I may have even Started a threads BACK IN 2014, when all this started..

I Remember Questioning why we were Supporting Nazis there after Hillary engineered the Coup.

I posted Threads on the WAG the DOG aspect,, with Sean Penn directing action.
and all the Fake Footage was unnecessary,,if it was real.


The Comedian can play piano with his dick,, but he is getting people killed pointlessly.

that's what you get from a Noisy Dick.
 
Last edited:
It looks like Ukraine used U.S. supplied HIMARS systems and blew up 3 bridges that cross the Dnipro River near Kherson to stop supplies getting to Russian troops that are now located on the western side of that river. I read the Russians installed a couple pontoon bridges and ferries to cross the river, however, i wonder how much supplies can make it to the Russian troops that are located there. It seems they are isolated and very vulnerable in their current location. What is your take on this?

A few relevant posts below. From what I can gather, the bridge strikes are a serious inconvenience but it is not critical. The strikes have left the bridges badly damaged but still crossable and repairable. Pontoon bridges have been deployed in parallel in case of further attacks.

The Ukrainians will need to do more if they want to isolate the troops in Kherson... logistics seem to be mostly unhindered as of right now.

-------
https://t.me/Slavyangrad/3671
�������� Regarding the "destroyed" Antonovsky bridge in the Kherson region by @rybar:

In order to completely destroy Antonovsky bridge, "Himars" and MLRS alone are not enough. For all the effectiveness of the fire on the facilities of the Russian Armed Forces, the Armed Forces do not have enough resources to guarantee the destruction of the bridge: it is necessary to destroy the pylons for this purpose.

Yes, the AFU can destroy the roadway over and over again. Will it cause problems? Yes. Moreover, given the huge amount of effort on the part of Ukraine and its allies, which is focused on reconnaissance of Russian Armed Forces facilities and movements of military columns, the bridge may try to cover military equipment on the march.

But by and large, this is not necessary. The AFU is now solving the problem of systematically creating panic in the liberated territories and depleting the Russian air defense system, which cannot cope with massive strikes.

For domestic audiences in Ukraine and the West, a media picture is being created of the systematic reputational failure of the Russian Federation, whose army is unable to defend the liberated territory of the Kherson region.

This is a task for the short term in order to show the power and superiority of the AFU, as well as to cover up not reputational but real failures of Kiev in Donbass and other directions.
#Russia #Ukraine #Kherson
@rybar

https://t.me/rybar/36197

‐--------
Nova Khakovka bridge working under heavy traffic

No SHORADs visible , Buk s can be nearby
No Ukrop arty threat in 40-50 km range, no excuse not to reinforce
https://t.me/missilesnukes/3760

‐----

The Antonovsky bridge is crossable, with pontoons already up and repairs starting it seems this is all that millions of dollars of HIMARS rockets gets you. A few large potholes in all due essentiality.

https://t.me/no_one_is_forgotten/6534

-------

���� The first footage of the construction of a pontoon crossing of the Russian Armed Forces appeared parallel to the Antonovsky bridge across the Dnieper in the Kherson region

The bridge is constantly under fire from Ukrainian militants. This crossing will make it possible to create a spare traffic across the river in case of critical damage to the Antonovsky bridge.

https://t.me/intelslava/34143

----

Pictures of the damage

https://t.me/DonbassDevushka/16244

----

The Railway bridge is indeed pretty messed up, but as seen below the pontoon railway is working fine:

https://tvzvezda.ru/news/202275435-hjOIF.html
 
Last edited:
A few relevant posts below. From what I can gather, the bridge strikes are a serious inconvenience but it is not critical. The strikes have left the bridges badly damaged but still crossable and repairable. Pontoon bridges have been deployed in parallel in case of further attacks.

The Ukrainians will need to do more if they want to isolate the troops in Kherson... logistics seem to be mostly unhindered as of right now.

-------
https://t.me/Slavyangrad/3671
�������� Regarding the "destroyed" Antonovsky bridge in the Kherson region by @rybar:

In order to completely destroy Antonovsky bridge, "Himars" and MLRS alone are not enough. For all the effectiveness of the fire on the facilities of the Russian Armed Forces, the Armed Forces do not have enough resources to guarantee the destruction of the bridge: it is necessary to destroy the pylons for this purpose.

Yes, the AFU can destroy the roadway over and over again. Will it cause problems? Yes. Moreover, given the huge amount of effort on the part of Ukraine and its allies, which is focused on reconnaissance of Russian Armed Forces facilities and movements of military columns, the bridge may try to cover military equipment on the march.

But by and large, this is not necessary. The AFU is now solving the problem of systematically creating panic in the liberated territories and depleting the Russian air defense system, which cannot cope with massive strikes.

For domestic audiences in Ukraine and the West, a media picture is being created of the systematic reputational failure of the Russian Federation, whose army is unable to defend the liberated territory of the Kherson region.

This is a task for the short term in order to show the power and superiority of the AFU, as well as to cover up not reputational but real failures of Kiev in Donbass and other directions.
#Russia #Ukraine #Kherson
@rybar

https://t.me/rybar/36197

‐--------
Nova Khakovka bridge working under heavy traffic

No SHORADs visible , Buk s can be nearby
No Ukrop arty threat in 40-50 km range, no excuse not to reinforce
https://t.me/missilesnukes/3760

‐----

The Antonovsky bridge is crossable, with pontoons already up and repairs starting it seems this is all that millions of dollars of HIMARS rockets gets you. A few large potholes in all due essentiality.

https://t.me/no_one_is_forgotten/6534

-------

���� The first footage of the construction of a pontoon crossing of the Russian Armed Forces appeared parallel to the Antonovsky bridge across the Dnieper in the Kherson region

The bridge is constantly under fire from Ukrainian militants. This crossing will make it possible to create a spare traffic across the river in case of critical damage to the Antonovsky bridge.

https://t.me/intelslava/34143

----

Pictures of the damage

https://t.me/DonbassDevushka/16244

----


This is all really good information. Thank you so much for responding.
 
Why are Ukrainians being liquidated?

f16b9319d7217d8a20ef723fea11592edbfca3998d5d347a0608da95069a2ea7
 
Ask Zelensky.

He's the one that is responsible for it.

No, I don't think so. Zelenksy doesn't stand but for Maidan enforcers. But why would the "right wing" want to liquidate itself in a hopeless struggle against people hopped up on the "Great Patriotic War"?
 
Yep, whatever press that lied to us about Ukraine “winning” should be taken off air

It was actually a Sales Pitch, to get everyone else involves in a petty civil war.

and though mildly successful,, everyone is rethinking this $tupidity.
 
It was actually a Sales Pitch, to get everyone else involves in a petty civil war.

and though mildly successful,, everyone is rethinking this $tupidity.

California National Guard & Wisconsin trained UKR'S soldiers in preparation to fight Russia

Trump almost got impeached trying to hold anybody accountable in Ukraine

Perpetual warmongers had a plan & enacted
 
California National Guard & Wisconsin trained UKR'S soldiers in preparation to fight Russia

Trump almost got impeached trying to hold anybody accountable in Ukraine

Perpetual warmongers had a plan & enacted

So did Canada,, and US Special Forces..

Before the Cross Border incursions by the nazi's they half trained.
 
Ukrainian top brass has acknowledged direct US involvement in killing civilians, Russian troops, and Prisoners of War.

Hence, Russia rightfully has accused the US of "direct involvement" in the war.

All the satellite information for targeting missile strikes and conducting the war is provided by US/UK.
The HIMARS strikes - according to a named, top Ukrainian commander - are approved or rejected by the US.

This means the HIMARS strike against Ukraininan POWs was a war crime committed by the US.

http://www.antiwar.com/
 
Ukrainian top brass has acknowledged direct US involvement in killing civilians, Russian troops, and Prisoners of War.

Hence, Russia rightfully has accused the US of "direct involvement" in the war.

All the satellite information for targeting missile strikes and conducting the war is provided by US/UK.
The HIMARS strikes - according to a named, top Ukrainian commander - are approved or rejected by the US.

This means the HIMARS strike against Ukraininan POWs was a war crime committed by the US.

http://www.antiwar.com/

They are afraid the Ukrainians will hit targets inside Russia or Crimea and force an escalation from Russia. The Biden administration likes their little proxy war, but doesn't want a world war.
 
Back
Top