First off he is a Liberal Rockefeller Republican turned Democrat:
https://twitter.com/LincolnChafee
He isn't a Libertarian, however he is closest to Ron Paul on foreign policy. He supports the blowback theory on terrorism like Ron Paul. He also is polling badly and needs funds and I think he is more deserving than Rand. Rand flirts with keeping the Iran non-issue an issue (like what happened with Iraq that lead to the Iraq war). The NIE released to the public stated that Iran was not pursuing a nuclear weapon. The deal is good considering Iran wasn't pursuing a nuke anyway and it lifts sanctions on the Iranian people. They do not deserve to live under sanctions. Lincoln Chafee at least deserves a look over by Ron Paul supporters. I supported Ron Paul. I do not support his son and find all the other candidates lacking when it comes to war and peace. Trump's only value comes from him pissing off his fellow plutocrats and giving us lessons on how to get political favors (if you can afford it). War is the health of the state and this man is the only one who is being honest concerning foreign policy. War has led to debt, loss of life, and loss of our freedoms. Lincoln Chafee deserves to be paid attention to at least. He deserves to be researched and scrutinized more than most of the politicians running for president in 2016. He also is in much need of support of the pro-peace constituency. The Pauls do not hold a monopoly on arguing for peace and Rand is seriously failing lately on that front.
Lincoln Chafee wants to bring Snowden home and not punish him because the government was wrong:
http://www.thenation.com/article/li...e-2016-debate-lets-bring-edward-snowden-home/
He voted against the Iraq war!
http://www.chafee2016.com/policy/
He unlike Rand is for the deal with Iran concerning its non-existent nuclear weapons program. He supports J-Street and isn't owned by AIPAC. He is against Israel mowing its lawn and wants peace negotiations with Hamas. He is against American foreign policy towards Russia, Syria, etc:
http://www.clarionproject.org/analysis/presidential-race-2016-candidate-profile-–-lincoln-chafee-d
Iran can have its revenge on us according to Michael Scheuer if we attack it: https://youtu.be/v1ex2HnovN4?t=8m17s
They have capability in North America he says...
https://twitter.com/LincolnChafee
He isn't a Libertarian, however he is closest to Ron Paul on foreign policy. He supports the blowback theory on terrorism like Ron Paul. He also is polling badly and needs funds and I think he is more deserving than Rand. Rand flirts with keeping the Iran non-issue an issue (like what happened with Iraq that lead to the Iraq war). The NIE released to the public stated that Iran was not pursuing a nuclear weapon. The deal is good considering Iran wasn't pursuing a nuke anyway and it lifts sanctions on the Iranian people. They do not deserve to live under sanctions. Lincoln Chafee at least deserves a look over by Ron Paul supporters. I supported Ron Paul. I do not support his son and find all the other candidates lacking when it comes to war and peace. Trump's only value comes from him pissing off his fellow plutocrats and giving us lessons on how to get political favors (if you can afford it). War is the health of the state and this man is the only one who is being honest concerning foreign policy. War has led to debt, loss of life, and loss of our freedoms. Lincoln Chafee deserves to be paid attention to at least. He deserves to be researched and scrutinized more than most of the politicians running for president in 2016. He also is in much need of support of the pro-peace constituency. The Pauls do not hold a monopoly on arguing for peace and Rand is seriously failing lately on that front.
Lincoln Chafee wants to bring Snowden home and not punish him because the government was wrong:
http://www.thenation.com/article/li...e-2016-debate-lets-bring-edward-snowden-home/
He voted against the Iraq war!
http://www.chafee2016.com/policy/
He unlike Rand is for the deal with Iran concerning its non-existent nuclear weapons program. He supports J-Street and isn't owned by AIPAC. He is against Israel mowing its lawn and wants peace negotiations with Hamas. He is against American foreign policy towards Russia, Syria, etc:
http://www.clarionproject.org/analysis/presidential-race-2016-candidate-profile-–-lincoln-chafee-d
Iran can have its revenge on us according to Michael Scheuer if we attack it: https://youtu.be/v1ex2HnovN4?t=8m17s
They have capability in North America he says...
Last edited:
