The Official Iowa Caucus Thread

Based on posts in this thread, people seem to be supporting Bernie Sanders- Socialist. Or is it just "anti-gay" (Buttigeig) and anti women (Warren)?

No I just have empathy for those being screwed over because it happened to Ron Paul in his primary runs, Zippy you were here don't you remember that?
 
Iowa has been more useful at sorting out the "also ran"s than in picking the eventual winners.
 
No I just have empathy for those being screwed over because it happened to Ron Paul in his primary runs, Zippy you were here don't you remember that?

Ron won in Iowa. Primaries are direct voting- harder to "screw" somebody with.
 
Based on posts in this thread, people seem to be supporting Bernie Sanders- Socialist. Or is it just "anti-gay" (Buttigeig) and anti women (Warren)?

You think bootyjudge and warren are not socialist- communists ? I have never seen any indication to believe warren is not .
 
Based on posts in this thread, people seem to be supporting Bernie Sanders- Socialist. Or is it just "anti-gay" (Buttigeig) and anti women (Warren)?

Saying that you think Bernie got robbed is not the same thing as supporting Bernie. I live in Omaha but I work in Iowa. The 2 candidates that people on the ground support are Biden and Bernie. I am not in any way anti gay and I also find it hard to believe that Buttigieg won anything in Iowa
 
The length of time they are taking indicates that they are collecting all of the individual paper ballots and counting them from scratch, disregarding any other counts. Now a thorough analysis of the data streams where discrepancies were found might be very enlightening. You might even be able to find the individuals in the process who were changing vote counts.

But even if you found them, there is no doubt it would be blamed on a simple transcription error by some little old lady. And a little old lady would never, ever intentionally cheat...

Yup.
Breaking: Ames County Volunteer "Deeply Sorry" for "Tabulation Error"
Hillary-Clinton-659480.jpg
 
I am not in any way anti gay and I also find it hard to believe that Buttigieg won anything in Iowa

Having grown up parttime in IA and the surrounding states, I too find it difficult to believe that a gay man with the name of buttplug would win the IA caucus. we are living in a comic strip world.
 
But is it really? I can't help but wonder if the same playbook that installed Trump is being used to propel Bernie. Lots of false opposition turned Trump from something of a joke candidate into the frontrunner and eventually the Presidency....and even continues to this day while he supports globalist initiatives like USMCA. Perhaps a similar playbook is being run to galvanize support behind Bernie, under a "the establishment hates him and are trying to screw him again" narrative. Trump's ascension proved that in an anti-establishment climate, the best way to install a pre-selected candidate is to fake opposition by the establishment.

I agree- and waaay possible.
 
A key point of reference is ABC reporter Kendall Karson revealing the DNC came in and took over the tabulations of the Iowa Caucus result prior to this release. One Democratic official I spoke to is being told that the DNC is “taking over” the accounting of results. The official said this that to their knowledge, this has never happened before.” (link)
This is important because it highlights that The Club decided what partial results, from what locations, showing what outcomes, the Club wants to put forth. Put another way, the DNC is releasing a specific 62% of the result to generate a specific Iowa narrative.
So what did they release:
Again, notice how all Club needs are met with this release.
Pete Buttigieg is proclaimed the winner (so far). This is narrative engineering that allows the promotion of Buttigieg and the diminishment of Bernie. Undermining Bernie is the paramount Club goal here. Buttigieg did not win the popular vote, and he will not likely be the final winner, but selecting this specific sub-set of votes allows a narrative to cement.
Next, notice how Joe Biden is propped up above the 15 percent threshold. This makes it appear that Biden will receive delegates. He may or may not; but for the narrative, propping up Biden is again a necessary club objective.
The dynamic to watch how Biden -vs- Sanders is played out and controlled. The Club needs to diminish Bernie and hide the collapse of Biden. The framework is to create a viable “Never Sanders” alternative?


More at: https://theconservativetreehouse.co...-buttigieg-lead-bernie-screwed-biden-covered/
 
To summarize what we have learned so far 1) Dem party did not like votes so adjusted them to give bootyjudge more 2) Old white Iowa dems are commies , want free shit and love Bernie or they like it in the ass and like to suck a little dick . LOL
 
Democratic presidential hopeful Pete Buttigieg maintained his slim lead in the Iowa caucuses after the second round of results from the Monday night contest was released.
The results, which accounted for roughly 71 percent of the precincts that voted, showed the former South Bend, Ind., mayor with 26.8 percent of the delegate share. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) nipped at his heels with 25.2 percent.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and former Vice President Joe Biden rounded out the top four with 18.4 percent and 15.4 percent, respectively.

More at: https://thehill.com/homenews/campai...d-after-second-round-of-iowa-results-released
 
[TABLE="class: e-table e-results-table"]
[TR]
[TH="class: e-th e-name, colspan: 2"]Candidate[/TH]
[TH="class: e-th e-votes e-diff-header-padding"]Total S.D.E.s*[/TH]
[TH="class: e-th e-percent"]Pct.[/TH]
[TH="class: e-th e-del"] Pledged delegates [/TH]
[/TR]
[TR="class: e-row e-buttigieg-67933 e-pete-buttigieg e-democrat e-has-image"]
[TD="class: e-cell e-img e-swatch-light e-dem-4 e-has-clr-bar"]
[/TD]
[TH="class: e-cell e-name e-swatch-light e-dem-4"] Pete Buttigieg [/TH]
[TD="class: e-cell e-votes"] 419 [/TD]
[TD="class: e-cell e-percent"] 26.8% [/TD]
[TD="class: e-cell e-del"] 10 [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: e-row e-sanders-1445 e-bernie-sanders e-democrat e-has-image"]
[TD="class: e-cell e-img e-has-clr-bar"]
[/TD]
[TH="class: e-cell e-name"] Bernie Sanders [/TH]
[TD="class: e-cell e-votes"] 394 [/TD]
[TD="class: e-cell e-percent"] 25.2 [/TD]
[TD="class: e-cell e-del"] 10 [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: e-row e-warren-62244 e-elizabeth-warren e-democrat e-has-image"]
[TD="class: e-cell e-img e-has-clr-bar"]
[/TD]
[TH="class: e-cell e-name"] Elizabeth Warren [/TH]
[TD="class: e-cell e-votes"] 287 [/TD]
[TD="class: e-cell e-percent"] 18.4 [/TD]
[TD="class: e-cell e-del"] 4 [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: e-row e-biden-1036 e-joseph-r-biden e-democrat e-has-image"]
[TD="class: e-cell e-img e-has-clr-bar"]
[/TD]
[TH="class: e-cell e-name"] Joseph R. Biden Jr. [/TH]
[TD="class: e-cell e-votes"] 241 [/TD]
[TD="class: e-cell e-percent"] 15.4 [/TD]
[TD="class: e-cell e-del"] 0 [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: e-row e-klobuchar-51526 e-amy-klobuchar e-democrat e-has-image"]
[TD="class: e-cell e-img e-has-clr-bar"]
[/TD]
[TH="class: e-cell e-name"] Amy Klobuchar [/TH]
[TD="class: e-cell e-votes"] 197 [/TD]
[TD="class: e-cell e-percent"] 12.6 [/TD]
[TD="class: e-cell e-del"] 0 [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR="class: e-row e-candidate-rollup e-others e-other e-no-image e-row-hidden"]
[TD="class: e-cell e-img e-has-clr-bar"]
[/TD]
[TH="class: e-cell e-name"] Others [/TH]
[TD="class: e-cell e-votes"] 24 [/TD]
[TD="class: e-cell e-percent"] 1.5 [/TD]
[TD="class: e-cell e-del"] 0[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
 
Back
Top