The Libertarian Case for Palin

Sarah Palin was the darling of this forum during the primaries. Did ya'll get brainwashed by the socialist Huffington Post and the idiots on Saturday Night Live? I think so, and some of you just follow the little clique on this board. Pitiful. Sarah Palin supported Pat Buchanan when he ran for president and she was involved with the Alaskan Independent Party which is an affiliate of the Constitution Party. I guess it's because ya'll are really young that you think you have to follow the unspoken leaders on this board rather than look at things objectively and most of you are still in high school and can't vote. Tones
 
tonesforjonesbones said:
Sarah Palin was the darling of this forum during the primaries.
Click to expand...

Not so. She was promoted by a few, as were many others.
(just as some proclaim, Glen Beck to be working on our side)
She was said to be on Ron Paul's short list, by these same promoters.
I never saw anything from Ron Paul to that effect.

She was rumored and promoted till it was accepted by many.
Then she jumped on board with McCain. :eek:
:confused:
 
Last edited:
tonesforjonesbones said:
Sarah Palin was the darling of this forum during the primaries. Did ya'll get brainwashed by the socialist Huffington Post and the idiots on Saturday Night Live? I think so, and some of you just follow the little clique on this board. Pitiful. Sarah Palin supported Pat Buchanan when he ran for president and she was involved with the Alaskan Independent Party which is an affiliate of the Constitution Party. I guess it's because ya'll are really young that you think you have to follow the unspoken leaders on this board rather than look at things objectively and most of you are still in high school and can't vote. Tones
Click to expand...

What are you, retarded? Palin's a dumb bitch slut! HAHAHAHAHA! We learned that from Katie Couric. Besides, all this talk of Sarah Palin is a distraction from working with our allies, the wonderful, principled socialists Dennis Kucinich and Bernie Sanders. LOL! They don't like the Federal Reserve!
 
I just had a look at who Palin follows on Twitter - establishment neocons like Hannity, McCain, Jindall, Huckabee, Rove, Gingrich, etc. And it's not a big list. Only name that stood out to me was DeMint.
 
tonesforjonesbones said:
Sarah Palin was the darling of this forum during the primaries. Did ya'll get brainwashed by the socialist Huffington Post and the idiots on Saturday Night Live? I think so, and some of you just follow the little clique on this board. Pitiful. Sarah Palin supported Pat Buchanan when he ran for president and she was involved with the Alaskan Independent Party which is an affiliate of the Constitution Party. I guess it's because ya'll are really young that you think you have to follow the unspoken leaders on this board rather than look at things objectively and most of you are still in high school and can't vote. Tones
Click to expand...

:rolleyes: bull chips...She was a darling to you and a few others who insisted we agree. I am not young, can vote and do, don't watch saturday night live, and avoid HuffPost as much as FOX news using only when necessary. Take your broad stroke elsewhere. I have made a rational, well thought choice not to follow another war monger who tries to moralize failed decisions by calling upon her god. She does not represent my idea of femininity or family values and needs to tend to her own home before running a country.
 
well nope...wrong to the above poster. I didn't even know who she was until mccain tagged her. I only know she was the DARLING of this forum when Mccain chose her..and MANY were very excited about Palin coming onboard....and THOSE people, there were quite a few, LEFT this forum because of little anarchists like YOU. FFS. tones
 
I, for one, always saw right through Palin. She was never a 'darling' to me, and I think she's probably an unprincipled "conservative" that all to easily sways the way of the neo-con.
 
tonesforjonesbones said:
well nope...wrong to the above poster. I didn't even know who she was until mccain tagged her. I only know she was the DARLING of this forum when Mccain chose her..and MANY were very excited about Palin coming onboard....and THOSE people, there were quite a few, LEFT this forum because of little anarchists like YOU. FFS. tones
Click to expand...

I didn't get the impression that she was the darling of these boards, but I wasn't as heavy a reader here at that time. Perhaps you're right. I'm on record as never trusting her or Beck.

No need to get upset at anarchists on these boards, Tones. We're on the side of individual liberty. :cool::) (tho some can be rude, sadly.)
 
tonesforjonesbones said:
well heavenly...they are typically rude. TONES (that attitude is what pissed people off with Ron Paul)
Click to expand...

I think many of the Christians here are equally as rude as atheists, or anarchists.

To be fair, i've been quite turned off by some of the Christian viewpoints and attitudes in here. We even have a Christian who advocates the use of the state for the capital punishment of all gay people. That's very offensive stuff, that i'm sure any believer in individual rights would be turned off by, if they read it.

I'm not a collectivist though, and i'll never act like you are towards the atheists. I'm have no religion or collective view point.

The problem with this forum, and why some people may be turned off is because people are too willing to jump to insults, accusations and rather than just stick to their fundamental logic, and honesty. There's no need to blame "groups" of people for your frustration, as we are just a collection of individuals.

No specific group is responsible for what you speak of.

And just my 2 cents, Sarah Palin will never get my support nor do i agree that this board treated her as a "darling", and i've been here a pretty dam long time.
 
claytrainor said:
i think many of the christians here are equally as rude as atheists, or anarchists.

To be fair, i've been quite turned off by some of the christian viewpoints and attitudes in here. We even have a christian who advocates the use of the state for the capital punishment of all gay people. That's very offensive stuff, that i'm sure any believer in individual rights would be turned off by, if they read it.

I'm not a collectivist though, and i'll never act like you are towards the atheists. I'm have no religion or collective view point.

The problem with this forum, and why some people may be turned off is because people are too willing to jump to insults, accusations and rather than just stick to their fundamental logic, and honesty. There's no need to blame "groups" of people for your frustration, as we are just a collection of individuals.

No specific group is responsible for what you speak of.

And just my 2 cents, sarah palin will never get my support nor do i agree that this board treated her as a "darling", and i've been here a pretty dam long time.
Click to expand...

+100000
 
That's offensive.

I'm offended.

I'm also amused upon figuring out why Tones' latest thread came into existence.
 
mccain-palin-anna-nicole.jpg
 
Palin is a power hungry slut who cheated on her husband with his business partner.

She is uneducated, war mongering, Israel worshiping neo-con who raised a slut for a dughter and cares more about career than family
 
I think most of you are confused about collectivism. VOLUNTARY collectivism is a good thing..such as all of us coming together to support liberty and Ron Paul...forced collectivism is BAD...like the government forcing things....Christianity is VOLUNTARY....therefore is not BAD collectivism. tones
 
tonesforjonesbones said:
I think most of you are confused about collectivism. VOLUNTARY collectivism is a good thing..such as all of us coming together to support liberty and Ron Paul...forced collectivism is BAD...like the government forcing things....Christianity is VOLUNTARY....therefore is not BAD collectivism. tones
Click to expand...

That's what I say about anarcho-communism, but people seem to have a knee-jerk reaction to "communism" being included.
 
I intend to pull Palin supporters (and Palin, if possible) into the fold.
Click to expand...

That's entirely different than supporting Palin, or doing anything which might put her in office.

Sarah Palin represents nothing I believe in - she is a big government stooge who is honestly not smart enough to think for herself.

Who doesn't toe the party line? Almost no one. That is why almost no one is worth supporting.

Going to a Sarah Palin rally and isolating libertarian-leaning conservatives is great.

Hand them a pamphlet which shows that Sarah Palin is more liberal than liberals of 50 years ago.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

jct74
Libertarian Party of New Hampshire Endorses Trump: ‘Best Candidate for Libertarians’
Replies
8
Views
849
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
jmdrake
Monica Lewinsky seeks to blow past her reputation with a new pod cast.
Replies
1
Views
156
unknown
unknown
unknown
Hospitals administering drugs then reporting patients for drug use.
Replies
12
Views
2K
Anti Globalist
Anti Globalist
Anti Federalist
Mass. Transqueeer turns himself in to Capitol Police after fizzled firebomb attempt
Replies
4
Views
671
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
Anti Federalist
Woman stabbed in the throat in Grand Central station: "No one would help"
Replies
5
Views
3K
Anti Federalist
Anti Federalist
Back
Top