"...The Calculus of Closure
On the surface, the arrest is a bipartisan sedative. For Republicans, it is vindication against the “Deep State”; for Democrats, it confirms the narrative of MAGA radicalization. A win-win. Everyone gets a talking point; nobody looks at the files.
But the files are screaming.
Representative Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), long the forensic conscience of the House, dismantled the official narrative immediately: “Three things I’ll never believe about the January 5/6 pipe bomb story: the bomber was a lone wolf; FBI was this incompetent for four years on a case this consequential; perpetrators were pro-Trump.”
Federal investigators did not begin with a suspect; they began with a data lake. Geofence warrants pulled in every device that drifted past the RNC or DNC, and reverse-keyword warrants identified anyone who typed “DNC,” “RNC,” or “pipe bomb DC” into Google. Constitutional scholars note that this is the definition of a general warrant - precisely the kind the Fourth Amendment was written to forbid.
By January 2023, the Bureau and its partners had interviewed roughly 1,000 people, visited more than 1,200 homes and businesses, assessed over 500 tips, ingested 39,000 video files, and compiled some thirty datasets from hardware stores, shoe vendors, and cell carriers - more than 105 million data points in all - with nothing to show the public but a grainy video clip and an ever-shifting story about why the data failed to deliver a name.
AdTech subpoenas produced a swarm of anonymized advertising IDs. By March 2021, the case team had isolated at least one Ad ID whose movements “matched” the suspect’s route as depicted in the FBI’s own video. Surveillance teams were dispatched to watch the user tied to that ID. Then the paper trail simply stops. The Bureau will not say why a lead strong enough to justify live surveillance quietly died on the vine.
When pressed on why earlier geofences failed, Assistant Director Steven D’Antuono blamed “corrupted data.” The House report quietly torpedoed that excuse. In early 2025, the Oversight Subcommittee wrote to all three major cell carriers to verify D’Antuono’s claim. Each carrier replied that it had not provided corrupted data to the FBI and had never been notified of any access issues. The “corrupted data” story was not a technical glitch; it was a bureaucratic alibi that collapses under sworn correspondence.
While the Bureau fumbled the data requests, independent analysts found the fatal flaw in the map itself. Armitas analysis reveals the FBI’s critical “Point 1” tower hit is a geometric fiction. The plotted sector does not physically cover the location cited. In the RF canyon of Capitol Hill, a misalignment of degrees is not a technicality; it is spatially impossible – it is an alibi.
...
While the timeline suggests orchestration, the biometrics suggest a mistake. The government asks us to believe Brian Cole is the figure on the tape. The laws of anatomy disagree.
Forensic analysis reconstructs the suspect’s architecture: broad shoulders, a short torso, a high waist, and a distinct “toe-in” gait that creates a prowling center of gravity.
Brian Cole is a biological mismatch. Measurements show the inverse: a narrow frame, long torso, low waist, and a neutral, upright gait. You can wear a hood. You can wear a mask. You cannot change the ratio of your femur to your spine.
...
Additionally, the hooded suspect adjusts their sweatshirt in a manner that appears to mimic adjusting the straps of a sports bra. The motion is seamless, moving from one shoulder to the next with fluidity and rapidity as if it was an ingrained behavior.
...
Kerkhoff’s footprint screams “protected asset.” She lived next to another person of interest, labeled POI3 in the earlier House Report. Her landlord - a State Department Public Affairs official with thirty years of experience talking directly with the press - crumbled on the phone, stumbling between “I don’t know anything” and insisting inquiries be forwarded directly to the FBI. Her dog walker revealed that she requires background checks for anyone entering her home, a practice rare among his clients, even among those in the Intelligence Community. In addition, he preemptively destroyed her alibi, confirming she owned a single greyhound, contradicting her claim of being filmed with multiple of her “puppies.”
...
Four hours.
That is the duration of the “custodial interview” that produced the government’s golden ticket. According to statements made by prosecutors at his initial appearance, Brian Cole didn’t just confess to planting the bombs; he recited the entire political catechism required to close the case - endorsing Donald Trump and parroting the “stolen election” narrative.
It’s almost too perfect. And it contradicts the human reality of the suspect.
Cole’s family describes him as “almost autistic-like because he doesn’t understand a lot of stuff,” and “very naive,” fundamentally incapable of the complex deception required to orchestrate a synchronized terror plot. Public profiles paint the same picture his grandmother does: a quiet, awkward man who walked his Chihuahua in red Crocs through a Virginia cul-de-sac, not a committed ideologue plotting symbolic bombs in the heart of D.C. So far, no photos have emerged showing Coles wearing any footwear other than his trademark crocs.
...
Place a neurodivergent subject in a windowless room with seasoned federal interrogators desperate for a headline. Does he understand his Miranda rights? Or does he understand that saying “yes” is the only way to make the pressure stop?
We may never know, because we may never hear his voice.
The FBI has not confirmed that the interrogation was audio- or video-recorded. If the government relies on “302” agent summaries rather than the suspect’s actual words, the confession becomes a paraphrase filtered through investigators’ interpretations. Courts have repeatedly warned that, for neurodivergent subjects, non-recorded interrogations are functionally unreliable – in effect, they become hearsay with a badge. Not recording the audio of a cognitively vulnerable suspect in the age of body cams is not only foolish, it forces a jury to assume it is coercion.
..."
More:
