THE DEFINITIVE THREAD Breaking-Santorum calls news conference for 2:00 Is he dropping?

I don't agree RP should now attack Romney. Keep the soft tone! Romney will keep making mistakes, he is unelectable. Ron Paul shouldn't expose himself too much now. Offense winning games, defense winning championships. Just let Romney further disqualify himself and the rest will happen automatically. Keep amassing delegates, this will be easier now for RP.

Santorum already should have 340 delegates. Projecting final 300 for Newt, requires us to have 500 RP delegates in Tampa to survive 1st ballot. One thing for sure: Texas is the key.

You can attack and be nice at the same time. Romney is unpredictable. What will we get in the White House, assuming he wins (IMO, he won't): the liberal/moderate Mitt or the conservative Mitt that he's claiming to be now? I think he already said last month that he would "tone it down" as soon as he clinches the nomination.

It's a valid concern, and I think it should be brought up.
 
Isn't it encouraging how many trolls keep coming back over and over with the sole purpose of trying to convince us we should give up? Someone seems pretty worried....

By the way, your username is an attack on a forum member and as a consequence is unacceptable. You might want to keep that in mind for the next persona you adopt.

Wow I had a cyberstalker and I missed the whole thing? I'm *sniff* honored.
 
“Rick, I know the decision was difficult to make. Thank you for running a great campaign and spreading your message of faith, family and freedom. You have truly inspired many across the country. God bless you and your family.“ – Sam Rohrer

who here said Rohrer was our guy in PA? I doubt he would release such a statement if Paul dropped out. Seals up my vote for Scaringi

Scaringi is TOTALLY our guy.
 
Technically bound since he suspended. Most state laws they remain bound unless a candidate drops out. Santorum won't officially drop out until Romney is a lock, IMO.

You forgot to add, "So still vote for him and his delegates." It's a strategy. :p
 
I just say PERFECT!
If Romney declared winner now by MSM, lots of his people will not go voting. This could lose Romney Texas and as Santorum will keep his delegates, + Newt prevailing in the South => Romney will miss 1144 1st ballot.

Remember Santorum was designed to block Paul. Recently he started to block Romney and his folks teaming up with RP. Thats why he had to go now. But it shows that GOP leaders are out of control. They planned to have Santorum in it til the end. They now pulled him earlier than planned. They didn't want to have RP one on one with Romney but couldn't leave it that way Santa stealing big amounts of delegates from Romney. They ran into their own trap recently.

Now they have to black out RP because naturally he should get much more focus.

While you are to be commended for FINALLY not spamming for your absolute JOKE a of an app...exactly where are you getting that Gingrich will win the south? He hasn't polled higher than Romney in ANY state, including the South in close to 2 months
 
He'll still be on the ballot (wherever he managed to be on it) so that will still bring votes to him.
People will still be looking for the anti-Romney.
Ron Paul is playing ads - proving he's STILL in the race despite what the media says.

Caucus states still rely on dedicated supporters - this lets the air out of Santo's supporters and may let Mitt's supporters get lazy and overconfident - so in my mind it is a great boost for us for caucuses.

Just one question.... WHAT CAUCUSES? They're all DONE.
 
While you are to be commended for FINALLY not spamming for your absolute JOKE a of an app...exactly where are you getting that Gingrich will win the south? He hasn't polled higher than Romney in ANY state, including the South in close to 2 months

an amazingly history full post -- for a first post?
 
We've talked all along how we wanted to end up as the conservative anti-Romney choice remaining. Well, we're here now. Let's see what we and the campaign can do with it. Texas really is huge.
 
Oh well. I'm voting Scaringi.

As long as it's not Welch, I'll vote for whoever wins. Rohrer and even Smith are ok with me.
Don't get me wrong Scaringi is a good guy, but no name recognition. None of my neighbors ever heard of him, and he lives about 20 mins from here.
 
Don't get me wrong Scaringi is a good guy, but no name recognition. None of my neighbors ever heard of him, and he lives about 20 mins from here.

Smith didn't have any until he bombarded airwaves and mailboxes in the last month. Now he's winning polls, he's on the Scranton stations every night lately. I saw Welch once. Nobody else. I only get one Philly station and haven't seen anyone on that.

I think Smith is going to win it.

Still voting Scaringi.
 
Honestly Kathy if the libertarian vote is split neither will win.

So... I should vote for Sam even though I think Mark is the better candidate? The Paul peeps in MY part of that state are totally behind Scaringi. As is a larger portion of the old guard than you would think.
 
So... I should vote for Sam even though I think Mark is the better candidate? The Paul peeps in MY part of that state are totally behind Scaringi. As is a larger portion of the old guard than you would think.

Well, as I see it, it comes down to ability to win. Polling is a little sketchy for the race, but it looks like the race is between Rohrer and Smith. So do you vote for a guy that you like a lot that is in the bottom tier of the polls, or do you vote for a guy you like a little that is in the top tier?

I'd hate to be looking at the results and see Rohrer lose by two points, and Scaringi have those 2 points.

So you said the Paul folks are behind Scaringi, but what about the rest of the electorate?
 
What it boils down to to me is NOT an ability to win. I have been voting for 28 years and I will never vote for a candidate I don't think is the best choice. I won't sell out. I never have and I never will. So if Sam loses by one vote, you can blame ME.
 
This is bad.

It becomes good if someone can come up with a theory that says "losing is good".

The biggest threat to our plans was Romney getting 1144, and this increases that likelihood.

If we want something to be enthusiastic about, we should have more delegates going into Tampa. That's a good thing, important, unless Romney has 1144, in which case it's "nice", but not really that important.

Perhaps Santorum dropping out could cause some momentum shift toward Paul which somehow would result in Romney getting fewer delegates with only 2 challengers than he would've gotten with 3 challengers. It's possible.

The only real question is whether Santorum dropping out means more delegates for Romney or less.

In PA, Romney and Santorum were at 40%, Paul and Gingrich were at 10%.

If all of Santorums votes went to Paul or Gingrich, that's great. But if any of Santorums votes went to Romney, it's good for Romney.

The most likely outcomes in the Northeast primaries are Romney wins everywhere handily. That was the case before, except not quite as handily.

The outcomes will be better for Paul in the states outside the Northeast. We'll need Santorum's rural voters in May.

Ron Paul should start talking like Santorum, focus on getting his voters.
 
What it boils down to to me is NOT an ability to win. I have been voting for 28 years and I will never vote for a candidate I don't think is the best choice. I won't sell out. I never have and I never will. So if Sam loses by one vote, you can blame ME.

But what are you "selling out" on? The guy has rock solid principles. C4L was behind him when he ran for Governor. He wants a Fed Audit, constitutional declaration of war, reduced regulation, state's rights, etc. I think the differences between Rohrer and Scaringi are in methodology more than ideology.
 
Back
Top