More thoughts
I think everyone can agree that a primary goal of this project is to gain media exposure. It's my feeling that a strong Iowa Ron Paul showing will net 20 times the exposure than any other coverage will.
I think we should specifically discuss...
1. What is the true value of having the blimp in Boston for the Tea Party? Yes, it might have a symbolic value to the people in the RonPaulForums. But past that, I'm not seeing a lot of return on investment. There's barely any national coverage of the Boston tea party anniversary, especially since its in the midst of Christmas season.
2. Other than Times Square revelers, what is the value of having the blimp in Times Square during the New Years celebration. I highly doubt this would be picked up on national TV. No network would mingle politics in the New Years revelry. But once again, these are just my thoughts.
3. FYI, 332,400 vehicles per day travel over the Illinois segment of I90/I94. This is a high density area, but there's still a really high level of traffic up and down this corridor in the outlying areas.
4. We need to analyze risk. What if we key the blimp on an area and Ron Paul doesn't do good? Personally, I doubt this will happen but anyone can feel free to weigh in if they want.
5. Yes, I'd bee-line that blimp straight to New Hampshire after its tour of Iowa.
6. Having come from just north of the Iowa border, I can attest to the RAPID pace that news would spread about the blimp. They simply don't have blimps in Iowa like other places.
But once again, my main point is that a strong showing in Iowa nets us WAAAYYY more media exposure than any other place. It's the reasons all candidates put most of their chips there.
Please, please, let's have more discussion on this one.
JN