I'm shuffling my list. You are now right up there at the top with AF.
So I'm off that easy . Sweet
I'm shuffling my list. You are now right up there at the top with AF.
So I'm off that easy . Sweet
There should be a ninth, middle option: "It's okay to be white."
There should be a ninth, middle option: "It's okay to be white."
No, I'm pretty sure that's supposed to be included under "White Supremacist."
Without a doubt, that is where that goes.
There's nothing in the definition of "White Abolitionist" that requires "color-blindness" - just the opposite, in fact.
White Abolitionism, as defined, requires conscious awareness of "whiteness" so that it can be "dismantled" (i.e., destroyed).
The Woke explicitly reject color-blindness and would categorize it as symptomatic of level(s) 1, 2, 3 and/or 4.
Color-blindness is characteristic of "equality" (as in, for example, "equality under the law"), for which the Woke also have no use.
Instead, they fetishize "equity" which requires awareness of color so that racialized inequities (which they say are systemic and always favor "whiteness") can be eliminated.
IOW: The Woke are driven by race-obsessed bigotry. They have no truck with color-blindness (or any other form of racial neutrality).
The Woke categorically and explicitly reject color-blindness, period (and not just color-blindness as practiced by white people).
The Woke do not seek the "cessation of categorizing people in racial categories" - because (among other things) such color-blindness would "erase" their "lived experience."
[IOW:] The Woke are thoroughgoingly racialist bigots [...]
White Abolitionist.
Abolitionist.
Abolitionist ...
![]()
That's a powerful political cartoon. Thanks. Spreading.
That's a powerful political cartoon. Thanks. Spreading.
I'm pretty jaded and it whacked me right in the face.
White Abolitionist.
Abolitionist.
Abolitionist ...
Abolition.
White Abolitionist.
Abolitionist.
Abolitionist ...
Abolition.
White Abolitionist.
Abolitionist.
Abolitionist ...
Abolition
...
There's nothing in the definition of "White Abolitionist" that requires "color-blindness" - just the opposite, in fact.
White Abolitionism, as defined, requires conscious awareness of "whiteness" so that it can be "dismantled" (i.e., destroyed).
The Woke explicitly reject color-blindness and would categorize it as symptomatic of level(s) 1, 2, 3 and/or 4.
Color-blindness is characteristic of "equality" (as in, for example, "equality under the law"), for which the Woke also have no use.
Instead, they fetishize "equity" which requires awareness of color so that racialized inequities (which they say are systemic and always favor "whiteness") can be eliminated.
IOW: The Woke are driven by race-obsessed bigotry. They have no truck with color-blindness (or any other form of racial neutrality).
The Woke categorically and explicitly reject color-blindness, period (and not just color-blindness as practiced by white people).
The Woke do not seek the "cessation of categorizing people in racial categories" - because (among other things) such color-blindness would "erase" their "lived experience."
[IOW:] The Woke are thoroughgoingly racialist bigots [...]
Genocide...working up momentum.