The 8 White Identities - from White Supremacist to White Abolitionist

Technically an actual ethical Civil War era Abolitionist is White Confessional on this scale in that they assume injustice can be corrected?

Hush. They're trying to erase that piece of history by using the word abolitionist to describe something besides abolitionists.

How can they foment division and rancor between those races if people like you educate the children with the fact that slavery was abolished by white people?

I have a hunch that the makers of that graphic may not have seen how they may be shooting themselves in the foot.

Do you honestly think racial harmony is their true objective? Really?

I believe the high point of relations between blacks and whites in the U.S. was the months after 9/11/01. Americans had a common enemy, which wasn't necessarily positive from a race standpoint overall, but it did unite non-arabic factions.

The powers that be decided that just wouldn't do, and set out to fix it. Which, to an intelligent and rational person, means screw it up.



Is there something to be done about it? Discredit the MSM and Dept. of Ed. Wish us luck.

The good news they're insulting everyone's intelligence in a major way. The bad news is a great many people really, really want to think of the ability to regurgitate propaganda as intelligence.
 
Last edited:
WTF is this shit?

I like being a white person. I like to do white person things with other white people. There is nothing wrong with that. I don't hate anyone and don't bring harm to anyone else.

I dislike the racists and supremacists, like KKK/Arayan nations/ stormfront crown. What they do is wrong. But if we are being honest here I don't really have any quarrel with the white nationalists. You know the ones who just want to live in bum fuck Idaho with only other white people. That doesn't harm anyone.

The ones who want to force this multiculturalism on everyone are just as bad as the racists.
 
As a further thought, the 1800s leaders of the Abolitionist movement on this scale, are White Critical.
Most voters in 1860 were White Benefit, even voters in the North who went to Honest Abe, nearly
every Segregationist from 1870 onward is White Privilege, they have an innate racism but may not
be harsh or cruel in their private lives, sometimes they may act like White Voyeurism or Supremacy.
Flip side of the coin, White Traitor and White Abolitionist are rare in the history books, only a handful
of the leaders of the Abolitionists were this thorough or severe. Civil Rights in the 20rh Century sought
a redress, a correcting of an injustice. Today's radicalism can be shrill. The historic conflict has been
where White Critical takes on White Privilege. Radicalism implies a utopian/dystopian "theology" often.
 
Last edited:
WTF is this $#@!?

I like being a white person. I like to do white person things with other white people. There is nothing wrong with that. I don't hate anyone and don't bring harm to anyone else.

I dislike the racists and supremacists, like KKK/Arayan nations/ stormfront crown. What they do is wrong. But if we are being honest here I don't really have any quarrel with the white nationalists. You know the ones who just want to live in bum $#@! Idaho with only other white people. That doesn't harm anyone.

The ones who want to force this multiculturalism on everyone are just as bad as the racists.

i know.... i become a White Voyeur if i play any vintage jazz records that have
artists who might be African-American, even if the band is racially mixed?
If this scale is part of a school curriculum, where were the textbooks published
at that they were going by? I assume there is a school committee behind it.
 
Last edited:
WTF is this shit?

I like being a white person. I like to do white person things with other white people. There is nothing wrong with that. I don't hate anyone and don't bring harm to anyone else.

I dislike the racists and supremacists, like KKK/Arayan nations/ stormfront crown. What they do is wrong. But if we are being honest here I don't really have any quarrel with the white nationalists. You know the ones who just want to live in bum fuck Idaho with only other white people. That doesn't harm anyone.

The ones who want to force this multiculturalism on everyone are just as bad as the racists.

Bigot.

Terrorist.

You are reported.
 
i know.... i become a White Voyeur if i play any vintage jazz records what have
artists who might be African-American, even if the band is racially mixed?
If this scale is part of a school curriculum, where were the textbooks published
at that they were going by? I assume there is a school committee behind it.

Funny you should mention that...here's what I am listening to right now.

https://onlineradiobox.com/us/wgbhjazzdecades/?cs=us.wgbhjazzdecades&played=1

Ray Smith's show was excellent but Arnold Olean's show on the old WBQQ in Maine was even better.

Alas, I've lost touch with him, the station is defunct and there appear to be no archives anywhere online.
 
OK, but the result after having dismantled whiteness would be color-blindness, that is the cessation of categorizing people in racial categories of which "white" is one. Granted, I see that this would only be the result that a "white abolitionist" is aiming toward, and not necessarily something they claim to have achieved.

Nevertheless, even if this state is only a desired end that defines the trajectory and not a result that can be achieved within the scheme itself, I have a hunch that the makers of that graphic may not have seen how they may be shooting themselves in the foot. I don't believe that abolition of whiteness is really want they want if they're honest with themselves.



I agree. Hence the conundrum I observed.

165d1f980961970f527cc85d7106b271.gif

Ha ha ha ha ha, that's some funny shit. Quite the imagination you have.
 
We learn GOOD BEHAVIORS from anyone who acts and behaves decently in society, regardless of skin color, gender, or sexual orientation.

This whole thing is an ASSAULT ON NORMAL BEHAVIOR. Making sure that people that are not racist are seen as something they are not, thus shunned and excluded from society as much as their influence can result in, but it creates a VACUUM of people that act reasonably, thus, when people observe other behaviors, they really start to think it is NORMAL to attack blacks.

This is ADVANCED PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE.

Basically, get rid of all fruits and vegetables and unmolested food products and REPLACE IT ALL with McDonalds and junk food. Same thing goes for behaviors, and this is especially destructive to the YOUTH.
 
I would be a slave owner. If it were still allowed.

I don't know if I would keep black slaves however. Mexicans tend to be more productive.
 
I am jew, asian, black, irish that pretty much looks white where do I fit in on this scale cause I am soooo confused right now.
 
But that would not be the result. The Woke categorically and explicitly reject color-blindness, period (and not just color-blindness as practiced by white people).

The Woke do not seek the "cessation of categorizing people in racial categories" - because (among other things) such color-blindness would "erase" their "lived experience."

I agree, once it's put that way, they inevitably realize that's not what they're for. But whether they realize it or not, that's what dismantling whiteness would entail, if successful.

That the makers of the scheme in the OP defined the highest state a white person can attain using words that cannot entail anything other than color blindness, is a testament to the incoherence of their thought. Dismantling whiteness, if successful, would render impossible the placing of people into racial categories of which "white" is one.
 
Last edited:
...
It was at that point that I realized there are at least two realities in the U.S., if not the world. It was also then that I realized there was something deep seated going on. 2020 brought a lot of it out to the forefront and it's been made clear that this is all a marxist ploy to take down individuals and white Americans ala Agenda 21, etc.

Whites, historically, have a natural propensity to be rebellious and whites are the face of "American rugged individualism." That is what is being rooted out as the last hold of freedom in this world, I think.
...

Put yourself in someone else’s shoes. For example, George Soros’ shoes.

Your goal is global domination. What do you do? You divide and conquer. You want the world divided and weak. You destroy your perceived competition and opposition. Nations are a hinderance that must be weakened or eliminated. European nations and the US are obvious targets. Sow strife and division. Break down anything that can be seen as common ground. Flood them with foreigners who don't have any common ground, other than basic survival, AKA “greed is good”. Tell them that the only threat to their survival and prosperity are the other peons that surround them. Tell them that nations themselves are a threat.

You see China as a desirable global model. Complete control over the population. No questions or opposition to the ruling plutocracy. Great as a partner in world domination. But will China become too powerful, and a threat?

/Soros Worldview
 
What if he/she was a Slave? an indentured servant?

My ancestors were and I am still guilty apparently. Irish people were brought here as indentured workers. It could be argued that the black slaves were actually better treated than the Irish. Slaves were property then and had value. Irish were worthless. Are they going to give us all reparations on St Patty's day?
 
Back
Top