Technocracy, Elon Musk, Eugenics

Biden’s USAID climate chief, Gillian Caldwell, was CEO of Global Witness (from 2015 to 2019), which covers up crimes against humanity under the guise of tackling climate change.
Before that, in 2007-2010, she started and led 1Sky, that lobbies in the US to implement climate crisis legislation: https://archive.ph/Js0ym


Global Witness is (of course) a British non-governmental organisation founded in 1993, and headquartered in London, England, which makes Caldwell another Crown agent.
In 2016, Global Witness received millions of dollars from the George Soros Open Society Foundation, Pierre Omidyar’s Omidyar Network, Ford Foundation and NATO governments: https://www.wrongkindofgreen.org/2018/03/20/from-the-end-of-history-to-the-end-of-truth/


I had previously posted about the "green" network that includes 1Sky.
Billy Parish is a director for the Solutions Project and 1Sky, and serves on the US Advisory Council for 350.org. 350.org was founded by Rockefeller and the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) is a key financier. The CGI also financed Step It Up that was renamed 1Sky, which then merged with 350.org in 2011.
Green-energy-is-big-business
 
Last edited:
The Trilateral Commission was founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski, to implement the New World Order based on Technocracy. Brzezinski described this in his 1970 book the “Technetronic Era”.
Here's Zbigniew Brzezinski's book on the “Technetronic Era”.
See some excerpts from his 1970 book.
.
The post-industrial society is becoming a “technetronic” society: a society that is shaped culturally, psychologically, socially, and economically by the impact of technology and electronics—particularly in the area of computers and communications.
Moreover, the United States has been most active in the promotion of a global communications system by means of satellites, and it is pioneering the development of a world-wide information grid. It is expected that such a grid will come into being by about 1975. For the first time in history the cumulative knowledge of mankind will be made accessible on a global scale—and it will be almost instantaneously available in response to demand.
(…)

The projected world information grid, for which Japan, Western Europe, and the United States are most suited, could create the basis for a common educational program, for the adoption of common academic standards, for the organized pooling of information, and for a more rational division of labor in research and development. Computers at M.I.T. have already been regularly “conversing” with Latin American universities, and there is no technical obstacle to permanent information linkage between, for example, the universities of New York, Moscow, Tokyo, Mexico City, and Milan.
Such scientific-informational linkage would be easier to set up than joint educational programs and would encourage an international educational system by providing an additional stimulus to an international division of academic labor, uniform academic standards, and a cross-national pooling of academic resources.
(…)

More directly linked to the impact of technology, it involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled and directed society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite whose claim to political power would rest on allegedly superior scientific know-how. Unhindered by the restraints of traditional liberal values, this elite would not hesitate to achieve its political ends by using the latest modern techniques for influencing public behavior and keeping society under close surveillance and control. Under such circumstances, the scientific and technological momentum of the country would not be reversed but would actually feed on the situation it exploits.
.

Brzezinski also wrote something in support of Communism (to control the masses)…
That is why Marxism represents a further vital and creative stage in the maturing of man's universal vision. Marxism is simultaneously a victory of the external, active man over the inner, passive man and a victory of reason over belief: it stresses man's capacity to shape his material destiny — finite and defined as man's only reality — and it postulates the absolute capacity of man to truly understand his reality as a point of departure for his active endeavors to shape it. To a greater extent than any previous mode of political thinking, Marxism puts a premium on the systematic and rigorous examination of material reality and on guides to action derived from that examination.
.

Zbigniew Brzezinski – Between two ages: America's role in the Technetronic Era (1970): https://archive.org/stream/pdfy-z5FBdAnrFME2m1U4/Zbigniew Brzezinski - Between Two Ages_djvu.txt
 
Here's an interesting essay on technocracy, see some excerpts (even the "hero" of this topic appears)...
This essay introduces the concept of convergence as developed by Henry Jenkins and explores how the practice has expanded in the current global pandemic milieu wherein the interests of a technocratic elite converge to cultivate a general acceptance of the digital tools of a new socioeconomic order. Alongside this analysis stands the historical development of computing tools and the development of data as tools of social control.
(...)

we suggest that emerging technologies not only “integrate [people] into the institutional structures of the larger society” (p. 1), but also into the so-called free market. We analyze the persuasive communications that serve this emerging order of the market working to integrate human beings into the forthcoming Internet of Things (IoT) where all organic and inorganic objects are prepared for sale and purchase.
(...)

In the wake of 9/11, the power elites have steadily tightened control over press freedoms and free speech on digital platforms in accordance with the oppressive mandates of the USA PATRIOT ACT and, as presently witnessed, the COVID-19 pandemic. Corporate and state power converge, here, to control public perception. In the United States, for example, a study by Gilens and Page concludes that the wishes of the people have “a non-significant [or] near-zero level” (Gilens and Page, 2014) impact on the creation of laws that improve policies for the public good.
(...)

If humans want to continue to add value to the economy, they must augment their capabilities through a merger of biological intelligence and machine intelligence. If we fail to do this, we'll risk becoming ‘house cats’ to artificial intelligence (Musk, 2017).
(...)

Beyond battling everybody in a “war of all against all,” the body politic, observes Miller, has been effectively dismembered,
—society balkanized by race-and-gender, as well as ‘blue’ and ‘red’, so that the necessary solidarity of the have-nots has come to seem impossible. While this development was hastened, if not initiated, by the CIA from the late'60s, it's now been universalized by social media, which offers the illusory solace of a fierce sense of belonging, and enables each of us to vent ferociously against ‘Trump’, ‘Putin’, ‘Killary’, the ‘fascists’, ‘homophobes’, ‘anti-vaxxers’, ‘anti-semites’ or whatever other tribe we have to hate. Thus, Social Media transforms each one of us into prolific war-propagandists; and now that we're all ‘sheltering in place’, most of us have little else to do except flip out on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, 24/7 (Miller, personal communication).
(...)

If imprisonment and slavery, therefore, began with the Auschwitz inmate tattooed with an analog Hollerith number (as Black's research reveals), the new slavery will end with a concentration camp prisoner microchipped in the global matrix with a digital number. The tools of the matrix are, at present, appearing everywhere, the smart cameras and sensors of the real world augmented by the goggles of virtual reality in the Internet of Things (IoT). They are pushed upon the people in clever marketing campaigns by the power elite. This inexorable march toward voluntary slavery in a new order of global economics should arrive as no surprise to those who have watched with unease the tools of big data applied to all products and commodities, both organic and inorganic.
(...)

As of this writing, we see in the present COVID-19 Pandemic a clear path toward the “Brave New World” of “Big Digital”—the planned disappearance of hard currency and its replacement implanted in people mandated to be socially distant, the Microchip as big-tech savior resurrected by the “super-predators, [with] no conscience, no empathy [aiming to] bring [all] to heel” (Clinton, 1996).
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00037/full
(https://archive.ph/HHsVN)
 
It's just so very easy to cover things up.
.
Other than that it's interesting that Elon Musk, like Peter Thiel, appears to be launched by the CIA.
In 2002, Elon Musk took along Mike Griffin to Russia to buy an intercontinental ballistic missile (which ultimately he didn't buy). In 2002, Mike Griffin worked for the CIA’s venture capital arm – In-Q-Tel.
.
On 19 May, I posted about Elon Musk (like Peter Thiel) effectively being launched by the CIA.
So on 30 May Elon Musk posted on Twitter - "Does anyone else feel like their being watched?" - with the logo and name of the CIA: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1531322193010954240
 
It sure is strange that Elon Musk is now praised by some media as a true champion for free speech (by forcing "humans" to identify themselves). It seems ever more unlikely that he wil actually buy Twitter.
Selling Elon Musk's first company Zip2 to Compaq made him a millionaire in 1999.

It's strange that the New York Times and Pulitzer Inc. were among the investors of Zip2, while Elon is now supposedly against the effective censorship by/through the mainstream media.
Another Zip2 investor was the Japanese SoftBank.

The most interesting of these investors could very well be Lauder Partners: https://www.crunchbase.com/search/principal.investors/field/organizations/num_investors/zip2


Lauder Partners was founded by Gary Lauder. Gary Lauder is the son of none other than Leonard A. Lauder, heir to the Estée Lauder billions. Whose family foundation employs such luminaries as Prince Laurentien of the Netherlands and Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild.
I've previously posted extensively on Leonard's younger brother, Trump's close friend Ronald Lauder.

Gary's wife since 1994, Laura Lauder, also works at Lauder Partners.
Laura Lauder is a fellow of the CFR, and trustee of the Aspen Institute: https://www.aspeninstitute.org/our-people/laura-lauder
 
It looks like the Jewish Frankfurt school really developed the technocratic policies...
.
Firestarter said:
The Frankfurt school focused on technology and entertainment for brainwashing purposes.
Technology could make individuals conform to the dominant patterns of thought and behaviour, and provide powerful instruments of social control.

In 1941, the Frankfurt school's Herbert Marcuse argued that technology constitutes an entire "mode of organizing and perpetuating (or changing) social relationships, a manifestation of prevalent thought and behavior patterns, an instrument for control and domination".

In 1969, the Frankfurt school's Walter Benjamin described how new mass media were supplanting older forms of entertainment, and newer releases replaced the interest in art of an earlier era.

The Frankfurt school's Jurgen Habermas described how the relationship between public debate and individual participation had been fractured into a realm of political manipulation and spectacle. "Citizens" become spectators of media presentations and are reduced to "objects of news, information, and public affairs".
Inasmuch as the mass media today strip away the literary husks from the kind of bourgeois self-interpretation and utilize them as marketable forms for the public services provided in a culture of consumers, the original meaning is reversed.
Dragon-court
 
The elite psychopath Lord Bertrand Russell published his book on technocracy in the Brave New World in 1931.

The first part of the book is boring, and it only starts to get interesting in chapter 9 "Technique in Physiology".
I find chapter 15 "Education in a Scientific Society" on a caste system where the lower class is destined (educated) to serve the higher "superclass" the most interesting, as it effectively describes some of the discrimination I faced at school and work as a talented boy, young man. Of course in our Brave New World a white man younger than 40 can't be discriminated against, according to political correctness...


See some excerpts.
Ordinary men and women will be expected to be docile, industrious, punctual, thoughtless, and contented. Of these qualities probably contentment will be considered the most important. In order to produce it, all the researches of psycho-analysis, behaviourism, and biochemistry will be brought into play. Children will be educated from their earliest years in the manner which is found least likely to produce complexes. Almost all will be normal, happy, healthy boys or girls.
(...)

Formal lessons, in so far as they exist, will be conducted by means of the cinema or the radio, so that one teacher can give simultaneous lessons in all the classes throughout a whole country.
(...)

On those rare occasions, when a boy or girl [is] the intellectual equal of the rulers, a difficult situation will arise, requiring serious consideration. If the youth is content to abandon his previous associates and to throw in his lot whole-heartedly with the rulers, he may, after suitable tests, be promoted, but if he shows any regrettable solidarity with his previous associates, the rulers will reluctantly conclude that there is nothing to be done with him except to send him to the lethal [death] chamber before his ill-disciplined intelligence has had time to spread revolt. This will be a painful duty to the rulers, but I think they will not shrink from performing it.
(...)

A great deal of scientific knowledge will be concealed from all but a few. There will be arcane reserved for a priestly class of researchers, who will be carefully selected for their combination of brains with loyalty. One may, I think, expect that research will be much more technical than fundamental. The men at the head of any department of research will be elderly, and content to think that the fundamentals of their subject are sufficiently known. Discoveries which upset the official view of fundamentals, if they are made by young men, will incur disfavour, and if rashly published will lead to degradation.
https://isgp-studies.com/bertrand-russell-s-world-dictatorship
Bertrand Russell - The Scientific Outlook (16.2 MB)
https://ia802608.us.archive.org/16/items/scientificoutloo030217mbp/scientificoutloo030217mbp.pdf
 
WEF advisor Yuval Noah Harari (educated at Oxford, where else?) describes the utopian technocratic Great Reset future. Because of internet and smartphones both monitoring and controlling the population, there is no chance of any large-scale revolution. Simply keep the herd under control through drugs and computer games!

In which human brains are directly hacked/merged with computers; computers (AI) making people obsolete, meaningless, useless, worthless. He also tells that these worthless people must die, but doesn't quite explain how this will be achieved (vaccines, health care, making everybody LGBT?)...
The Useless Class The most important question in twenty-first-century economics may well be what to do with all the superfluous people. What will conscious humans do once we have highly intelligent non-conscious algorithms that can do almost everything better?
 
In 1962, Aldous Huxley gave the lecture “The Ultimate Revolution” (really about technocracy) at UC Berkeley Language Center that includes.
.
Today we are faced, I think, with the approach of what may be called the ultimate revolution, the final revolution, where man can act directly on the mind-body of his fellows… we are in process of developing a whole series of techniques which will enable the controlling oligarchy who have always existed and presumably will always exist to get people to love their servitude.
This is the, it seems to me, the ultimate in malevolent revolutions shall we say, and this is a problem which has interested me many years and about which I wrote thirty years ago, a fable, Brave New World, which is an account of society making use of all the devices available and some of the devices which I imagined to be possible making use of them in order to, first of all, to standardize the population, to iron out inconvenient human differences, to create, to say, mass produced models of human beings arranged in some sort of scientific caste system.
https://risingtidefoundation.net/2021/11/10/who-will-be-brave-in-huxleys-new-world/


The previous essay is part of an interesting 4 part series on Aldous Huxley, HG Wells, Malthus, Theosophy, the Frankfurt School, Technocacy (not named...), Ordo Templi Orientis, psychiatry, MK-ULTRA, and more.
Parts 2-4 can be read at the following links: https://archive.ph/RUVEh
https://archive.ph/dghJk
https://archive.ph/BZ71k
 
Free speech champion Elon Musk will ensure that humans will be forced to identify themselves on X with a face scan. This will surely make X a better technocratic surveillance tool, with no doubt other social media to follow, while BOTs will be used to control the masses.

Reportedly X will do this privacy violation in collaboration with the Israeli (or Dutch?) company Au10tix, that already provides “identity intelligence services” for Google and PayPal. In this ploy, Au10tix will also get access to this personal data: https://www.gizmochina.com/2023/08/18/x-takes-aim-at-impersonation/


Au10tix is a subsidiary of ICTS international, that is registered in the Kingdom of the Netherlands and was founded, owned and operated by senior officers of the Mossad, since it was established in 1982, by former members of the Shin Bet and El Al airline security agents.
Menachem J. Atzmon is chairman and owns more than 60% of the shares of ICTS International: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICTS_International


That’s the same ICTS international that was responsible for passenger screening and airline security at Newark, Boston Logan, and Dulles, from where the 9/11 “hijacked planes” departed.
ICTS also ran security at the Schiphol Amsterdam airport from where the “Underwear Bomber” departed on Christmas Day 2009: https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=4467#p4467
 
Isn’t it strange that our free speech hero Elon Musk is whining about censorship by the US government, including though the “Twitter files” propaganda campaign and more recently starting frivolous lawsuits, while the censorship by the EU is more draconic?!?

Elon Musk's "Twitter Files" forgot to tell us that there was a formal European Commission program “Fighting COVID-19 Disinformation” in which all major social media platforms, including Twitter, participated.
As part of this censorship collaboration, Twitter reported to the European Commission on its censorship of content and accounts all over the world (so not just in the EU).

It is impossible that Twitter is not continuing to communicate with EU officials about censoring online content. While the EU’s “Fighting COVID19 Disinformation” program was technically ended, it's censorship practices continue under the more general "Code of Practice on Disinformation". Twitter, and other online platforms, are obliged to fight "misinformation" (which of course includes those facts that come a little too close to exposing the sordid state of our Brave new world).
While the “U.S. government censorship” policies were sort of requests, but Twitter cannot refuse the demands of the European Commission (that can impose hefty fines)... if it wants to remain active in the EU.

While Elon Musk has complained about the censorship by team Biden, he has posted positively about his meeting with EU Commissioner Thierry Breton in January.
dca6e5344699f92c89d5ef4b69802b68d93f2169.png


The European Commission can even conduct warrantless searches of company premises.
The EU’s censorship has continued to control Twitter. It demanded to suppress reports on election fraud in Brazil since 30 October 2022: https://dailysceptic.org/2023/02/26...telling-you-about-the-eus-twitter-censorship/
 
Silly me, thinking that smartphones are merely surveillance equipment, when it has become the smart fools’ god!

61% of the 1,000 parents polled, thinks their smartphone is one of the most helpful tools for raising their kid. Parents do an average of 78 internet searches a week for childcare. 43% of parents do not understand how kids were raised before smartphones.

There’s nothing like conditioning your child by demanding it smiles for the camera a hundred times every single month. At this time parents are more interested in the pictures of their children, that they can post on social media to show what great parents they are, than their child…

An earlier poll showed, that some mothers of young children felt guilty, judged, or worried their child might be a retard as a result of the online application to control help them.

Am I the only one to think that it’s strange that the study didn’t look at the obvious possibility that they spend less attention on their children, because of the smartphone that controls them as their “god”: www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/art...-dont-know-parents-survived-without-them.html
 
I don’t know what’s so special (new) about “Amazon Sidewalk” or the “Helium Network”, but this is an informative story on how technology is being used to implement the technocratic surveillance state that is really an open prison.

See a depiction of the Amazon Sidewalk connecting Internet of Things (IoT) devices.
23cab751a9cc889ff05169e61e94978ab1e069ff.jpg


By using “smart” technology every 15-minute city will be completely monitored. Thanks to all the snitches walking around with the surveillance equipment called mobile phones.
By creating digital portraits they know how you think, so you can be easily manipulated: https://healthimpactnews.com/2023/b...o-connect-all-internet-of-things-iot-devices/
 
The following is a good story that argues that internet (originally ARPANET) was always intended by the US Department of Defence research agency ARPA (now DARPA) as a surveillance and psychological warfare tool.

In 1958, ARPA was formed under Defence Secretary Neil McElroy, to promote the nuclear bombs threat and space travel hoaxes for propaganda purposes.
McElroy was thrust into this position from President of Proctor & Gamble, where he had pioneered the format of “soap operas”, melodramatic TV series designed to sell household products to housewives (of course TV has been used to promote any kind of politically correct behaviour)...

After McElroy quickly returned to Proctor & Gamble, William Godel rose to deputy director. For Godel, space travel was only a psychological game of public relations, with a message of nuclear Armageddon. Godel funded “completely screwball” ideas because they were “bold and scientifically interesting”:
These included a plan to control Vietnamese villages through mass hypnosis, an acoustic sniper-detection system (which produced 5,000 false positives in field tests), an interplanetary spaceship powered by thousands of nuclear explosions and a magnetic force-field to repel incoming Soviet warheads
.
The RAND Corporation was hired by ARPA on how to weaponise behavioural science:
The Pentagon started throwing money at social and behavioural scientists, hiring them to make sure America’s “counterinsurgency weapon” always hit its target, regardless of the culture in which it was being fired. Under William Godel, ARPA became one of the main pipelines for these programs, helping to weaponise anthropology, psychology, and sociology and putting them in the service of American counterinsurgency.
.
On 2 June 1975, NBC correspondent Ford Rowan “appeared on the evening news to report a stunning exposé”, exposing that ARPANET was used to “spy on Americans and share surveillance data with the CIA and NSA”.
The responsible parties simply promised to delete the collected data, and went ahead like nothing happened.

Even Google’s Larry Page’s first 1998 research paper was “funded by DARPA”: https://expose-news.com/2023/03/10/internet-surveillance-and-censorship-from-outset/
 
In essence there is no difference between the green agenda and technocracy, besides the words used to promote this tyranny.

In April 2019, the Guardian’s George Monbiot published an open letter entitled “A Natural Solution to the Climate Disaster – Climate and ecological crises can be tackled by restoring forests and other valuable ecosystems, say scientists and activists”, co-signed by green agenda celebrities, including Greta Thunberg, Naomi Klein and Bill McKibben.
This was to promote the launch of Monbiot's Natural Climate Solutions.

One of the first institutions to highlight Monbiot’s Natural Climate Solutions launch was the Food and Land Use Coalition, initiated by Paul Polman and none other than Mark Malloch Brown (there he is again!!).

The same NGOs that started the Natural Capital agenda (via the Natural Capital Coalition) – with Nature Conservancy and We Mean Business - are also the architects of “natural climate solutions”.
The Natural Capital Coalition is working with mulitnational corporations and big institutions to make us - the slaves - pay for nature....
See organisations involved in the Natural Capital Coalition.
https://www.wrongkindofgreen.org/20...tural-climate-manipulations-volume-ii-act-vi/
(https://archive.ph/9F9TF)


The Dutch Paul Polman was an executive at both Nestlé and Procter & Gamble before becoming Unilever CEO (2009-2018), he is also a Honorary Knight Commander of the Order of the British Empire.
Polman studied at the University of Groningen (where else?) and joined the Vindicat atque Polit corps, graduating in 1977.
Polman is a member of the World Economic Forum International Business Council, and even co-chair of the World Economic Forum in 2012. He was also a board member of the UN Global Compact.
.
Firestarter said:
In 2014, none other than Lynn Forester de Rothschild founded the Coalition for Inclusive Capitalism. Its Working Group includes such luminaries: as Sir Evelyn de Rothschild (of E.L. Rothschild, Lynn's husband and financial adviser to Queen Elizabeth), Dominic Barton (from McKinsey and Company), Ann Cairns (of MasterCard), Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles (of HSBC), and Paul Polman (of Unilever).
Green-energy-is-big-business

.
Firestarter said:
The True Price Foundation has a 3 man board:
- Herman Mulder, formerly of the infamous ABN Amro Bank (yes, them again!), knighted by former Dutch Queen Beatrix
Enslaved-by-World-Bank-and-IMF


Worldconnectors was launched by Herman Mulder that also started the "The True Price Foundation". Worldconnectors is also connected to Paul Polman.
In April 2009, Herman Wijffels became co-chair of Worldconnectors. Wijffels is the former chairman of Rabobank, president of the Dutch government's hugely influential SER council and the Worldbank administrator for the Netherlands: (in Dutch) https://interessantetijden.nl/2018/02/02/tirannie-van-groene-intenties/


For more on Mark Malloch Brown.
As co-chair of the International Crisis Group, Malloch Brown supported the narco-terrorist linked Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA). The KLA was also supported by Rhodes Scholar Strobe Talbott, the CIA and NATO.
In 1995, Strobe Talbott referred to Soros as “a national resource—indeed, a national treasure”.

The International Crisis Group was started with seed money from George Soros.
Biden-administration-run-by-Blinken's-WestExec
 
Last edited:
Epstein's co-conspirator (now in jail, reaffarming her Chabad-Lubavitch faith) Ghislaine Maxwell was famously pictured with Elon Musk at a Vanity Fair Oscar party in 2014, but Musk lied that he didn’t know that she was standing behind him…
D_SGcJFXUAIrC_k.jpg


According to "a staffer who was at the soirée", Elon Musk and Ghislaine Maxwell "had a whole chat about aliens, humans living in a simulation, and — oh yeah — scrubbing oneself from the internet": https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/com...o-scrub-someone-from-the-internet/ar-AA12SNyT


There are some more ties between Elon Musk and Jeffrey Epstein...

Jeffrey Epstein introduced one of his ex-girlfriends to Kimbal Musk, Elon Musk's younger brother. She dated Kimbal Musk in 2011 and 2012, and Epstein occasionally met Kimbal, who serves on the boards of Elon's Tesla and SpaceX.

Epstein and Elon dined together at least twice: a 2011 "Edge" dinner in Long Beach California, and another organised by LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman.

Reportedly Epstein and his entourage had a private tour of Elon Musk's SpaceX facility in Hawthorne, California, in 2012.

A few days after the SpaceX tour, Epstein was invited for Kimbal's 40th birthday party in New York in September 2012.
While Epstein didn't go, at Epstein's request the daughter of Barclays CEO James E. "Jes" Staley, Alexa Staley, did. Jes Staley was a long-time business associate of Epstein: https://archive.vn/Iozqv
 
The following interesting article is almost completely blocked. It isn’t found with Bing, Yahoo, or Duckduckgo (Google.nl finds it though), when I searched with”Islam and the West looks to new dark age by Luba George, European Correspondent”, it should find the November 1981 EIR article, but instead it only finds a copy from another site (https://www.civilianintelligencenet...1117_032-islam_and_the_west_looks_to_dark.pdf).


In October 1981, weeks after the assassination of President Anwar Sadat of Egypt, a conference in Paris was hosted by President of the French section of the “Islam and the West” think tank Jean-Pierre Fourcade, Club of Rome founding member Aurelio Peccei (Bilderberg, WWF) and former head of the UN Fund for Population Activities, Lord Caradon.
French Foreign Minister Claude Cheysson, who was present for the opening ceremony, had caused an international uproar earlier that month when he remarked at Sadat's funeral, that "the assassination of Sadat was the removal of an obstacle" to peace in the Middle East.

Lord Caradon represented British Foreign Minister Lord Carrington (KG 1985) and Prince Philip (KG, with whom he co-founded Population concern in 1977).

Aurelio Peccei said that countries in the Middle East and Africa should be organised along "theocultural and religious" lines and "not on territorial boundaries of existing nation-states”. In reality he was calling for destabilisation of the Middle Wast to implement a technocratic world order.
Peccei expressed "deep concern" that Egypt and Jordan had the "greatest population problems" in the Middle East:
In Egypt there definitely will have to be a population reduction. Sadat's economic policies were a disaster.
.
To achieve the aims of Global 2000, which calls for a drastic reduction of the world's population, the Paris conference dictated 2 projects of "urgent priority" to be carried out in 2 years: 1) revision of Islamic traditional texts and historical textbooks and, 2) a "science and technology" project, an euphemism for technocracy and enforced backwardness.
The "science and technology" project would be a joint effort by Islam and the West and the International Federation of Institutes for Advanced Studies (lFIAS). IFIAS was directed by Club of Rome members Alexander King, Aurelio Peccei, Eduard Pestel, and the Soviet Dzhermen Gvishiani: https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/...1117_032-islam_and_the_west_looks_to_dark.pdf
(https://web.archive.org/web/2023051...1117_032-islam_and_the_west_looks_to_dark.pdf)
 
Last edited:
Who could have guessed (of course some know!) that Joe Biden is the product of the green pacifist commie agenda that was designed to implement technocracy (while of course the wars and destruction of nature continue)?!?

In 1972, the Council for a Livable World helped to get Joe Biden first (s)elected to the US Senate.

None other than Albert Gore Sr. (the father of the Noble prize winning mr. climate change) raised $89,000 of the $287,000 Biden raised for his campaign.
On 21 June 1971, it was reported that Albert Gore Sr. would become chairman of the Council for a Livable World.

Gore Sr. was himself made by Armand Hammer, long-time head of Occidental Petroleum, who became a millionaire by trading with the Soviet Union. Hammer regularly met with chairman Lenin when he lived in the Soviet Union from 1919 to 1928: https://www.theepochtimes.com/opinion/russian-collusion-look-to-joe-biden-2858519
(https://archive.ph/XrTMt)


President George H.W. Bush pardoned Armand Hammer for making “illegal contributions” to Richard Nixon’s re-election campaign.

Commie collaborator Armand Hammer was also close to none other than King Charles, donating nearly 40 million pounds to Charles’ “charities” and free use of Hammer's Boeing 727 in the 1970s and ’80s.

See Princess Diana dancing with oil magnate Armand Hammer.
9e3a6b5e8b10aa59a663ce9a9a4d6483497a7b19.jpg

https://www.bustle.com/entertainmen...charles-in-house-of-hammer-armie-royal-family
(https://archive.ph/bckyo)
 
Already in 1988, King Charles, the green man, interviewed Al Gore Jr. (before he was selected as Clinton’s vice president): https://www.theatlantic.com/persona...ce-charles-the-once-and-future-al-gore/39642/


Since then the 2 eco-fascists repeatedly met, including in April 1991 when Charles held a meeting that included Gore Jr. on his Britannia yacht, in preparation for the UN Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

In 1990, Al Gore also met Charles’ dad, Prince Philip, in Washington. Gore consulted the networks Philip brought together at this occasion for his first book “Earth in the Balance: Ecology and the Human Spirit” (1992).

In December 2006, Gore met Charles at his Highgrove country home, preparing for an event at Charles’ St.James Palace, to launch an Accounting for Sustainability project.

On 28 January 2007, Charles got the 10th Annual Global Environmental Citizen’s Award from the Harvard Medical School’s Center for Health and the Global Environment, where Gore “praised the Prince of Wales’s knowledge and passion, [and] said he and the prince have had conversations about global environment for 20 years”.
See Charles, Gore, and Meryl Streep at the award ceremony.
53516400193510b1c64697d3395af2c5ddc85e49.jpg

https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/...0425_060-al_gore_britains_malthusian_agen.pdf
 
Back
Top