Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,686
Taking things from white people
- Thread starter Anti Federalist
- Start date
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,686
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,686
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,686
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,686
jmdrake
Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2007
- Messages
- 52,933
I already gave you the evidence but I don't see what that matters anyway. Considering the whole "Eating the cats eating the dogs" like I'm surprised he got any black votes. But millions of blacks stayed home. That's a big reason why Biden lost.
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,686
I do not disagree with that.
Many blacks did stay home.
I was just hoping to see more than a 1 percent increase overall.
jmdrake
Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2007
- Messages
- 52,933
But at the same time you were wanting Trump to specifically appeal to white people. He did that with the racist "Eating the cats, eating the dogs" campaign angle. You got what you wanted. You want more black people voting Republican? You need to run someone like this:
Edit: And Donald Trump doesn't have a bad record when it comes to black people. Obama had taken millions of dollars earmarked for HBCUs and instead put it in the general education fund for everybody.
https://www.tmcf.org/events-media/t...lationship-between-hbcus-and-president-obama/
Trump restored the HBCU funding and then made it permanent.
https://apnews.com/article/c4834e48841d97c5a93312b1bf75302a
To be honest Obama was more of an anti-DEI president that you say that you want than Trump. He didn't do things for black people. There wasn't anything specific in the Affordable Care Act for black people. There was the "transgender healthcare" provision which is why Trump was able to trip Kamala Harris up about federal funding for trans illegal immigrant inmates. But I digress.
Biden and Harris took money meant for COVID relief and instead encouraged states and cities to spend billions of it on police.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politi...the-american-rescue-plan-and-community-safety
And yet Kamala Harris had talked about "defund the police."
https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/26/poli...d-the-police-movement-in-june-2020/index.html
And she and fellow Democrats had fillibustered police reform that Trump likely would have signed.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/24/politics/senate-police-reform-bill/index.html
Bill Clinton and Joe Biden pushed through the racist Clinton / Biden / Gingrich crime bill which led to the drug setentcing disparties that Ron Paul talked about and Trump reversed that with the first step act. Even as late as 2023, Obama operative Van Jones (quietly) priased Trump for that.
https://www.politico.com/newsletter...ones-first-step-act-criminal-justice-00092125
And the whole "Platinum Plan" Trump put forward back in 2020 was the closed blacks have ever gotten to federal reparations. (Nazi companies like Ford and GM got reparations by the United States congress as a reward for committing treason against the United States in WW 2...but blacks who are still alive after the Tusla race riots can't get shyt.)
But was there any mention of the Plantium Plan in 2024? Nope. Did Trump campaign on the First Step Act in 2024? Nope. He did tell Patrick David Bet that he still thinks he did the right thing.
When Trump went to the National Black Journalist Association meeting (kudos for going) he didn't say anything specific about his past (pretty good) record for doing things that helped the black community specifically. Granted the first woman on the panel was really being a witch. (And feel free to change the spelling). The second woman was sincere and a real journalist, but I was disappointed that Trump didn't do anything but defend his asinine claim that police needed MORE immunity. The third woman was the black lady from Fox News about she and Trump basically had a friendly chat but no substance. Inteserstingly enough the first woman wore blue (Democratic colors), the Fox host wore red (Republican colors), and the woman in the middle, who was actually trying to get Trump to answer questions about black concerns, wore black. Coincidence? Maybe.
I really think that but for the George Floyd riots, Trump was poised to actually run a campaign aimed at making real inroads in the black community. So, what happened? Tucker Carlson. YouTube won't let me embed this video, but here's a link.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3n5_D59lSjc&rco=1
At 16 minutes in, Tucker criticizes the Trump administration for only talking about the tragedy of George Floyd's death and not talking about the not-so-peaceful protests. From that moment on, Trump went all in on "law and order" and "back the blue" rhetoric and nothing publicly about holding police accountable even going so far as to tell a black woman to her face that he thinks police need MORE immunity.
So, Trump did what you wanted campaign wise and got the results you wanted. He got a majority of the white vote, male and female, despite white females showing by passing pro abortion referrendums that they are still with the Democrats on that issue even while voting for Trump. And some blacks were like "Well...maybe we'll take a chance on another 4 years of Trump" and many more taking the [MENTION=40029]PAF[/MENTION] position of "Yeah....let's just not vote at all." I can tell you this. While millions of blacks didn't buy into the rhetoric of "Trump's going to put you back on the cotton plantation" fear mongering, whether they voted for Trump or just stayed home, many of the ones who did vote for Kamala Harris are actually not in a good way mentally at the moment. It was a terrible campaign psychological warfare wise. And Trump and Harris tagged teamed on that.
Last edited:
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,686
I worded that wrong, "hoping" is not really what I meant...expected maybe... or "not surprised" at the final results.
Getting Trump elected is really just scratching the surface of what I want.
And I would bet the farm on Ron getting no more of the black vote than Trump, especially once the "racist newsletter" trope got trotted back out.
But alas, we'll never know...
jmdrake
Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2007
- Messages
- 52,933
You're right. We'll never know. But notice that even your reasoning for why Ron Paul might not have done so well with blacks also goes back to an obvious appeal to white racism that was done in his name. Those newsletters are the only blot on an otherwise great record. I can explain away his Civil Rights Act vote. On the newsletters I just say "Well he didn't write them" but that's still not good. If the newsletters were pushing for gender affirming surgeries for minors I doubt many here would give them a pass just because he didn't write them. I'm willing to look past race baiting to a certain extent. Not everybody is. Trump did a lot of race baiting this time and still made modest gains percentagewise and didn't trigger a major voting "blacklash." Oh, and by the way, that's the answer to the "What happened to the millions of Biden voters from 2020" question. They stayed home.
Anyhow, Trump could make some real inroads in these next few years. He could follow through on the Platinum Plan. He could pardon the Uhuru 3. (Black people that Biden prosecuted for speaking out against the Ukraine War and going to the U.N. to speak out against genocide of African people in the U.S. and around the world.) He could get Tim Scott's police reform bill passed. He basically could complete being George C. Wallace. (Progressive who cloaked himself in segregationist rhetoric but ultimately came out of the closet as a progressive.)
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,686
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,686
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,686
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,686
Posted by: Daniel Concannon @TooWhiteToTweet
It looked more like Mumbai than the White Mountains of New Hampshire over Columbus Day weekend last month.
Record crowds turned up to hike to the best spots to view New Hampshire's famous fall foliage. What stood out about these record crowds, though, was not only how foreign they were, but how many hailed from the Indian subcontinent.
Predictably, record amounts of garbage littered the trails once the “leaf-peepers” had finally cleared out.
New Hampshire's most popular trails were not just covered in various paper and plastic waste, but in soiled diapers and - can you guess?
Adult human feces.
Naturally, the only ones left to clean up in the aftermath were White locals who actually care about the place they live and act in accordance with First World standards of living.
There was significant public outcry over the gross overcrowding and grotesque soiling of the landscape. Many experienced local hikers spoke out about how unsafe the conditions became due to the overcrowding, inexperience, and recklessness, while online forums filled up with stories of the unique stamp of squalor left behind by thousands of Third Worlders.
No one in the public eye, however, discussed the racial implications of what transpired. And of course they didn't; half of them are actively anti-White and the other half are moral cowards living in eternal fear of being called “racist” for speaking observable facts of reality.
New Hampshire's diversity-worshiping, CRT-funding, despicable anti-White governor - who was conspicuously absent from the cleanup effort - responded to his constituents' widespread concern by mocking their desire for sanity and declaring: “We love the crowd!”
In other words: “To hell with our state's citizens and its natural beauty - we want every last dollar for our chambers of commerce, no matter how much human excrement comes with it!”
This entire debacle from the White Mountains of New Hampshire is a perfect microcosm of what's at play more broadly across both the United States and the rest of the Western (i.e., White) world:
We're governed by a political class of soulless whores beholden not to the people of their nations, states, provinces, or cities, but to the moneyed interests who pull their strings, instruct them to throw borders open to everyone from everywhere, celebrate the destruction wrought by uncivilized people, and then demonize and persecute any actual member of Western Civilization who speaks up about the degradation of society.
Our landscape will continue being defaced and defecated upon until we - ourselves - replace the people orchestrating our replacement.
https://x.com/AntiFeder1776/status/1863084816717038025
It looked more like Mumbai than the White Mountains of New Hampshire over Columbus Day weekend last month.
Record crowds turned up to hike to the best spots to view New Hampshire's famous fall foliage. What stood out about these record crowds, though, was not only how foreign they were, but how many hailed from the Indian subcontinent.
Predictably, record amounts of garbage littered the trails once the “leaf-peepers” had finally cleared out.
New Hampshire's most popular trails were not just covered in various paper and plastic waste, but in soiled diapers and - can you guess?
Adult human feces.
Naturally, the only ones left to clean up in the aftermath were White locals who actually care about the place they live and act in accordance with First World standards of living.
There was significant public outcry over the gross overcrowding and grotesque soiling of the landscape. Many experienced local hikers spoke out about how unsafe the conditions became due to the overcrowding, inexperience, and recklessness, while online forums filled up with stories of the unique stamp of squalor left behind by thousands of Third Worlders.
No one in the public eye, however, discussed the racial implications of what transpired. And of course they didn't; half of them are actively anti-White and the other half are moral cowards living in eternal fear of being called “racist” for speaking observable facts of reality.
New Hampshire's diversity-worshiping, CRT-funding, despicable anti-White governor - who was conspicuously absent from the cleanup effort - responded to his constituents' widespread concern by mocking their desire for sanity and declaring: “We love the crowd!”
In other words: “To hell with our state's citizens and its natural beauty - we want every last dollar for our chambers of commerce, no matter how much human excrement comes with it!”
This entire debacle from the White Mountains of New Hampshire is a perfect microcosm of what's at play more broadly across both the United States and the rest of the Western (i.e., White) world:
We're governed by a political class of soulless whores beholden not to the people of their nations, states, provinces, or cities, but to the moneyed interests who pull their strings, instruct them to throw borders open to everyone from everywhere, celebrate the destruction wrought by uncivilized people, and then demonize and persecute any actual member of Western Civilization who speaks up about the degradation of society.
Our landscape will continue being defaced and defecated upon until we - ourselves - replace the people orchestrating our replacement.
https://x.com/AntiFeder1776/status/1863084816717038025
Last edited:
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,686
