Taking things from white people

Anti Federalist said:
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1853285526586945932

Click to expand...



Not a picture anywhere yet.

Teen charged in 92-year-old man’s shooting death in north St. Louis County

https://fox2now.com/news/missouri/t...mans-shooting-death-in-north-st-louis-county/

by: Joey Schneider

Posted: Nov 8, 2024 / 03:18 PM CST

Updated: Nov 8, 2024 / 03:18 PM CST

ST. LOUIS COUNTY, Mo. – A teenager faces felony charges in the shooting death of an elderly man last week in north St. Louis County.

The St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office has charged Da’Mon Williams, 18, with second-degree murder and armed criminal action amid the investigation.

Williams is accused in the shooting death of Robert Prewett, 92, on Oct. 30 in the 6900 Block of Parc Charlene Drive.

According to a probable cause statement obtained by FOX 2, when authorities responded to the scene, Prewett was found deceased with three gunshot wounds.

Police later reviewed home surveillance footage, which showed a suspect fleeing from the scene with a tan mask, gloves and jacket. The surveillance video also showed the suspect getting away from the scene toward to a nearby apartment complex, where clothing items were discarded in a dumpster.

Investigators recovered these items, and a DNA analysis later linked Williams to the clothing and shooting scene.

The St. Louis County Police Department reports that Williams was incarcerated in the state of Illinois prior to Friday’s charges. He is being held on $500,000, cash-only bond.
 
TheTexan said:
All of that ^ is bad philosophy based on an unacknowledged but ingrained ethical foundation of slavery where things like the right to disassociate aren't even considered. (Thanks Abe!)

Nations have a right to exist, because people have the right to voluntarily associate to form nations.

The author of that article should be saying, that no state or government, has the right to prohibit your disassociation.
Click to expand...


I take it you didn't read the entire article. I's good to do that from time to time :up::cool:
 
PAF said:
I take it you didn't read the entire article. I's good to do that from time to time :up::cool:
Click to expand...

Yea I read the top half only.

Then I read the bottom half and edited my post cus it's just a semantic circle jerk of whether nations are people or whatever. (YAWN)

Pointless article
 
TheTexan said:
Yea I read the top half only.

Then I read the bottom half and edited my post cus it's just a semantic circle jerk of whether nations are people or whatever. (YAWN)

Pointless article
Click to expand...


Well, the will of the people want to be slaves, so why not go all out. I, on the other hand, don't want fed.gov down my throat anymore than it is, so I'll keep trying for those who are willing to listen and understand.

Thanks for throwing in the towel /s
 
PAF said:
Well, the will of the people want to be slaves, so why not go all out. I, on the other hand, don't want fed.gov down my throat anymore than it is, so I'll keep trying for those who are willing to listen and understand.

Thanks for throwing in the towel /s
Click to expand...

I'm not throwing in the towel, I'm just pointing out that it's a dumb useless thing to say that an organization doesn't have the right to exist, on the foundation that only people have rights. Well organizations are simply groups of people. Saying Organization XYZ has the right to do X is a whole lot shorter and easier to say than "The people of Organization XYZ acting collaboratively under that banner have the right to collectively do X".

It's not a meaningful argument, like I said... it's just a semantic circle jerk, and I fully regret my post responding to it entirely.
 
TheTexan said:
I'm not throwing in the towel, I'm just pointing out that it's a dumb useless thing to say that an organization doesn't have the right to exist, on the foundation that only people have rights. Well organizations are simply groups of people. Saying Organization XYZ has the right to do X is a whole lot shorter and easier to say than "The people of Organization XYZ acting collaboratively under that banner have the right to collectively do X".

It's not a meaningful argument, like I said... it's just a semantic circle jerk, and I fully regret my post responding to it entirely.
Click to expand...


I don't understand illogic rationale. I try to come down to others levels but it still doesn't compute. That said, you and I are both set in our ways. You go your way, I'll go mine. We can bust balls in other threads :up::cool:
 
[MENTION=33245]TheTexan[/MENTION] , we're so f&cked anyway nothing even matters anymore :up:
 
TheTexan said:
I'm not throwing in the towel, I'm just pointing out that it's a dumb useless thing to say that an organization doesn't have the right to exist, on the foundation that only people have rights. Well organizations are simply groups of people. Saying Organization XYZ has the right to do X is a whole lot shorter and easier to say than "The people of Organization XYZ acting collaboratively under that banner have the right to collectively do X".

It's not a meaningful argument, like I said... it's just a semantic circle jerk, and I fully regret my post responding to it entirely.
Click to expand...

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government
 
Anti Federalist said:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government
Click to expand...

Yea and I get that, it's just way easier and shorter to say, "the United States has a right to defend its borders" than to say "the people of the United States have the right to call upon its organization to perform border defense duties on their collective individual behalf".

Until someone comes up with a shorter way to say that, I'm gonna keep saying the United States does have rights. (because "the United States" implicitly means, the people of the United States)
 
https://x.com/NatCon2022/status/1855773505368768768



suspect.png
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Anti Federalist
Community Relations Service defunded starting in 2026
Replies
16
Views
76
Anti Federalist
Anti Federalist
Swordsmyth
Disproportionate Black Crime Rates in America Exposed
Replies
18
Views
220
otherone
otherone
jmdrake
Civil lawsuit filed against 74 year old man who a year ago slit 7 year old girl's throat
Replies
7
Views
54
PAF
PAF
jmdrake
WSJ : The data on race and murder that Elon Musk gave a ‘!’ deserved a ‘?’
Replies
0
Views
91
jmdrake
jmdrake
jmdrake
Black lesbian couple in Virginia allegedly chased by white locals with guns until they crashed with severe injuries
3 4 5
Replies
95
Views
1K
jmdrake
jmdrake
Back
Top