sam1952
Member
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2007
- Messages
- 1,680
Taking things from white people
- Thread starter Anti Federalist
- Start date
acptulsa
Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2008
- Messages
- 77,231
It means all individuals differ one from another, which means these bright, crisp lines people try to use to divide us into groups invariably must be dull and fuzzy in real life.
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,701
Never said I was brother, at least when it comes to things medical. I was just asking the question, because I don't know...I'm not holding a set of statistics up my sleeve.
But if you are going to determine if DEI hiring practices help or harm the general level of competence within a given group of professionals, then you have to have a baseline of competency and a non-arbitrary metric by which to measure these groups.
We still have the issue of whether it is even legal, DEI hiring that is.
I was hospitalized with COVID and given Remdesvir along with other anti virals. It cured me.
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,701
So, there are observable, definable differences between groups of people, but the lines are not sharply defined and there are numerous "exceptions to the rules"?
Pretty sure that is what I have been saying all along.
Snowball
Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2011
- Messages
- 5,449
Actually, six months later, Fauci was still warning about the vaccine potentially being risky. This May-August time is when he was at great odds with Trump because Trump hated masks because they hurt his economy and Trump wanted to expedite the vax as a solution. Fauci didn't have the executive power, or agency power like Trump and Pompeo. The battle for a traditionally-developed and approved vaccine was lost, because Trump was adamant. It was political, just like his blasting of Fauci and Birx was political because he was so worried about his 2020 Election chances. Fauci can't talk freely about the true Covid origins. Nobody in Congress or Potus ever has. That is a state secret not fit for public consumption.
It was in late 2021, after the vaccines had been in the public for almost a year that Fauci did say mandates would be effective.
But this is besides the point I'm trying to make with both the previous and this post. I think you guys can put 2+2 together if you peruse the links.
August 2020
Fauci: "there’s never a guarantee that your candidate will be both safe and effective. So there's always the big question mark."
https://newsinhealth.nih.gov/2020/08/dr-anthony-fauci-covid-19-vaccines
Fauci’s first run-in with Trump’s “rage” came when his cellphone rang on June 3, 2020.
“The caller—the president—started screaming,” Fauci writes.
His offense? He told a reporter immunity to a coronavirus usually lasted between six months and a year.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/on-ca...s-allnearlyon-trump-covid-and-other-disasters
"He told Congress this month that he, his wife, and his adult daughter were the subjects of death threats."
https://www.thedailybeast.com/anthony-fauci-covid-book-volcanic-donald-trump-screamed-f-bombs-at-me
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,701
"I don't know if that house is worth all that now, with all that diversity that has moved in."
jmdrake
Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2007
- Messages
- 52,940
Trump was rightly against mask mandates because there is no science behind them. Fauci initially said that. Masks were a fig leaf to cover up for a failed lockdown policy.
Also August 2021 is still not even close to the 18 month timely Fauci had put out. And Fauci could talk freely about the true origins of COVID especially now that his emails h ave been leaked. State secret my ass! Those emails weren't classified. What's also not classified is Dr. Fauci's 2012 statement that the gain of function research he was pushing might cause a pandemic but that would be "worth it." Fauci is a monster.
Snowball
Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2011
- Messages
- 5,449
like I said, read the second link. Nothing to add. "In 2018, USAMRIID..."
jmdrake
Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2007
- Messages
- 52,940
If you were given other anti virals then you can't say the Remdesivir cured you. The only thing I took was magnesium citrate. As for qualifications in medicine, During my marriage my ex-wife had to re-test to be certified. So DEI has nothing to do with competence in the medical field. In fact I'll go a step further. Meharry Medical College, one of the largest HBCU medicals in the country, won't even graduate doctors who can't pass the boards. White medical schools in general don't have that requirement.
Last edited:
jmdrake
Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2007
- Messages
- 52,940
A self serving article where Fauci got to throw Trump under the bus for his own crimes? And you believe that shyt?
Now you need to read this link!
https://www.yahoo.com/news/fauci-argued-benefits-gain-function-185934217.html?guccounter=1
In a newly resurfaced paper from 2012, Dr. Anthony Fauci argued that the benefits of gain-of-function research are worth the increased risk of a potential pandemic-causing lab accident.
The Weekend Australian unearthed a paper Fauci wrote for the American Society for Microbiology in October 2012 in which he argued in support of gain-of-function research. Such research involves making viruses more infectious and/or deadly. Experts have raised the possibility that the COVID-19 pandemic could have originated from a potential lab leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China, where gain-of-function experiments on bat coronaviruses have been conducted.
Despite the risks involved, Fauci called gain-of-function experiments “important work” in his 2012 writing:
In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic? Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a scenario – however remote – should the initial experiments have been performed and/or published in the first place, and what were the processes involved in this decision?
Scientists working in this field might say – as indeed I have said – that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks. It is more likely that a pandemic would occur in nature, and the need to stay ahead of such a threat is a primary reason for performing an experiment that might appear to be risky.
Within the research community, many have expressed concern that important research progress could come to a halt just because of the fear that someone, somewhere, might attempt to replicate these experiments sloppily. This is a valid concern.
The Weekend Australian unearthed a paper Fauci wrote for the American Society for Microbiology in October 2012 in which he argued in support of gain-of-function research. Such research involves making viruses more infectious and/or deadly. Experts have raised the possibility that the COVID-19 pandemic could have originated from a potential lab leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China, where gain-of-function experiments on bat coronaviruses have been conducted.
Despite the risks involved, Fauci called gain-of-function experiments “important work” in his 2012 writing:
In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic? Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a scenario – however remote – should the initial experiments have been performed and/or published in the first place, and what were the processes involved in this decision?
Scientists working in this field might say – as indeed I have said – that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks. It is more likely that a pandemic would occur in nature, and the need to stay ahead of such a threat is a primary reason for performing an experiment that might appear to be risky.
Within the research community, many have expressed concern that important research progress could come to a halt just because of the fear that someone, somewhere, might attempt to replicate these experiments sloppily. This is a valid concern.
I'm not the only one to have noticed this. The Hill pointed out how, after the fact, Fauci and Trump have tried to distance themselves from each other. The only thing that Robbie got wrong in this clip is his belief that Republican voters would not be fooled and Trump's collusion with Fauci would help Desantis. Sorry [MENTION=3169]Anti Federalist[/MENTION] but "white conservative" primary voters cared more about giving Trump the chance at a rematch with Biden then they did with COVID accountability.
Snowball
Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2011
- Messages
- 5,449
Are you daft? Wrong link. I even started the sentence for you. Man.
jmdrake
Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2007
- Messages
- 52,940
You're clearly the daft one. The second link you gave is the daily beast article and it was self serving drivel. The title of the nonsense you think is so important.
"On Call: Anthony Fauci Tells All—Nearly—on Trump, COVID and Other Disasters"
And this was your second link:
https://www.thedailybeast.com/on-ca...s-allnearlyon-trump-covid-and-other-disasters
Now before you start whining again about forum decorum let the record reflect that you started with the name calling.
acptulsa
Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2008
- Messages
- 77,231
... orange juice and constant naps in a chair, because pneumonia only happens when you're lying down.
Not the most pleasant two and a half days of my life.
Snowball
Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2011
- Messages
- 5,449
jmdrake
Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2007
- Messages
- 52,940
Yes. And I agreed with you on the point that Dr. Fauci said it would take a year an a half for the vaccine to be ready but then he reversed his course once Trump was out of office. Maybe I was a little off on the timing of the mandates. But within 6 months Fauci was at least recommending a vaccine he said wouldn't be ready for 18 months and in 12 months Fauci was on board with mandating that vaccine to children! Trump wasn't in office to pressure Fauci.
Edit: More on the Fauci vaccine timeline. In May, 2021, Fauci was agreeing with the idea (now proven false), that being vaccinated would prevent transmission and that the vaccinated could be exempt from mask mandates. Get vaccinated to get a little bit of your freedom back.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/transcript-dr-anthony-fauci-face-the-nation-05-16-2021/
JOHN DICKERSON: So, if- if a person is deciding whether or not to get vaccinated, they have to keep in mind whether it's going to keep them healthy. But based on these new findings, it would suggest they also have an opportunity, if vaccinated, to knock off or block their ability to transmit it to other people. So, does it increase the public health good of getting the vaccination or make that clearer based on these new findings?
DR. FAUCI: And you know, JOHN, you said it very well. I could have said it better. It's absolutely the case. And that's the reason why we say when you get vaccinated, you not only protect your own health, that of the family, but also you contribute to the community health by preventing the spread of the virus throughout the community. And in other words, you become a dead end to the virus. And when there are a lot of dead ends around, the virus is not going to go anywhere. And that's when you get a point that you have a markedly diminished rate of infection in the community. And that's exactly the reason, and you said it very well, of why we encourage people and want people to get vaccinated. The more people you get vaccinated, the safer the entire community is.
JOHN DICKERSON: And do you think now that this guidance has come out on relaxing the mass mandates if you've been vaccinated, that people who might have been hesitant before will start to get vaccinated in greater numbers?
DR. FAUCI: You know, I hope so, JOHN. The underlying reason for the CDC doing this was just based on the evolution of the science that I mentioned a moment ago. But if, in fact, this serves as an incentive for people to get vaccinated, all the better. I hope it does, actually,
DR. FAUCI: And you know, JOHN, you said it very well. I could have said it better. It's absolutely the case. And that's the reason why we say when you get vaccinated, you not only protect your own health, that of the family, but also you contribute to the community health by preventing the spread of the virus throughout the community. And in other words, you become a dead end to the virus. And when there are a lot of dead ends around, the virus is not going to go anywhere. And that's when you get a point that you have a markedly diminished rate of infection in the community. And that's exactly the reason, and you said it very well, of why we encourage people and want people to get vaccinated. The more people you get vaccinated, the safer the entire community is.
JOHN DICKERSON: And do you think now that this guidance has come out on relaxing the mass mandates if you've been vaccinated, that people who might have been hesitant before will start to get vaccinated in greater numbers?
DR. FAUCI: You know, I hope so, JOHN. The underlying reason for the CDC doing this was just based on the evolution of the science that I mentioned a moment ago. But if, in fact, this serves as an incentive for people to get vaccinated, all the better. I hope it does, actually,
By August 2021, Fauci pushed for vaccine mandates for school children.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/fauci-backs-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-us-school-children-2021-08-29/
WASHINGTON, Aug 29 (Reuters) - Dr. Anthony Fauci, the top U.S. infectious disease expert, said on Sunday he supports COVID-19 vaccine mandates for children attending schools as the highly contagious Delta variant of the coronavirus continues to fuel a surge in cases in the nation.
"I believe that mandating vaccines for children to appear in school is a good idea," Fauci told CNN’s "State of the Union" program. "We've done this for decades and decades, requiring polio, measles, mumps, rubella, hepatitis" vaccinations.
"I believe that mandating vaccines for children to appear in school is a good idea," Fauci told CNN’s "State of the Union" program. "We've done this for decades and decades, requiring polio, measles, mumps, rubella, hepatitis" vaccinations.
More recently Fauci admitted that vaccine mandates may have increased vaccine hesitancy even though he had been a proponent of making people's lives "difficult" to pressure them to get vaccinated.
https://oversight.house.gov/release...nscript-highlights-key-takeaways-in-new-memo/
VACCINE MANDATES: Dr. Fauci admitted that vaccine mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic could increase vaccine hesitancy in the future. He also claimed that these mandates were not sufficiently studied ahead of the pandemic. Previously, Dr. Fauci advocated “that when you make it difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological bullshit, and they get vaccinated.”
The man is a weasel and a fraud.
Last edited:
jmdrake
Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2007
- Messages
- 52,940
I can only speak for myself. I tried juice and lying down (I was forced to lie down because I couldn't sit up more than 30 minutes at a time) and all of the vitamins and supplements I had read were good for fighting COVID. (Zinc, vitamin D, melatonin, NAC, etc). Nothing helped until I took my ex's advice. In fact she called me the next day after she gave me the advice and asked my how I felt and I said terrible and she said "You didn't do what I said did you?" She as right. I hadn't. It was like Naaman not wanting to dip in the Jordan. I know people had different experiences with COVID though.
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,701
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,701
Should have went in the Invasion USA thread.
Last edited:
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,701
I was going to make a comment about how the entire state of NH went through four days of Independence Day fireworks, and partying and block parties and parades and boat rallies and motorcycle events without a shooting, stabbing or murder of any kind.
In the whole fucking state.
It's not guns...at the parade where I posted the clip of my barber's Trump float, the following people right around me were armed: me, my son, my daughter, my dad, my future son in law, my friend "J", my friend "B" and numerous strangers open carrying.
Not a single murder or even non fatal shooting or stabbing, as far as I can tell, in the whole state.
Until that is, well...you see, I had forgotten how much cultural enrichment we have been receiving.
https://x.com/TooWhiteToTweet/status/1810384606761197582
In the whole fucking state.
It's not guns...at the parade where I posted the clip of my barber's Trump float, the following people right around me were armed: me, my son, my daughter, my dad, my future son in law, my friend "J", my friend "B" and numerous strangers open carrying.
Not a single murder or even non fatal shooting or stabbing, as far as I can tell, in the whole state.
Until that is, well...you see, I had forgotten how much cultural enrichment we have been receiving.
https://x.com/TooWhiteToTweet/status/1810384606761197582
https://x.com/AntiFeder1776/status/1810424646023442519
Last edited:
Anti Federalist
Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2007
- Messages
- 118,701
Daniel Concannon
@TooWhiteToTweet
Ireland names professional victim / BLM activist / Critical Race Theorist / Anti-White agitator / nightmare-faced Nigerian Ebun Joseph as 'Special Rapporteur for the National Plan Against Racism.'
The insanity of this is so obvious on its face that it need not be explained.
Now call me 'racist.' Tell me about my 'White fragility.' And don't forget my 'White rage.' Say everything you need to say to make yourself feel better about the fact that someone else possesses the integrity that you lack to state the most obvious truths in the world.
The only thing uglier than Ebun's face is the castrated system-shilling of the subverted eunuchs who support this worldwide Anti-White agenda.
There's no natural progression that takes Ireland from Michael Collins to Ebun Joseph in 100 years, just like there's no natural progression that takes America from Andrew Jackson to George Floyd in 200.
This is the assassination of Western Civilization - the War On White People.
We either take back control of our own nations, or we continue allowing the worst people in the world to install openly hostile Anti-Whites in positions of power to oppress and replace us.
We either reject our enemy's prescription for our extinction and eject them from our nations, or we perish.
Similar threads
