STOP Demonizing Teachers and Cops.

Not as boring as your archist crap.

Congressman Ron Paul: Archives

[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Past articles by Congressman Ron Paul on LewRockwell.com[/FONT]
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul-arch.html

:rolleyes:

Yes, Lew Rockwell admires Ron too.

That does not change the fact that Ron Paul is a constitutionalist and thus advocates a limited constitutional GOVERNMENT.

I hate it for ya, but those are the facts.

Question: Do you categorize Ron Paul's words and writings as "archist crap" too?
 
Question: Do you categorize Ron Paul's words and writings as "archist crap" too?

I'll pipe up here.

Some of it, yes (for me anyway, though the question was posed to TW).

Though I find it would hurt my cause to waste my time ripping down RP, so I don't.

Provoking such actions seem irresponsible (or if not necessarily irresponsible... certainly an in the heat of debate kinda moment).
 
When and IF I ever happen to run into any members of the libertarian "movement" :rolleyes: I'll be sure to pass Ron's message along. ;)

Does this mean that you don't think any of us wanting to reinstate the Constitution are in your eyes working in the "libertarian movement"? If not, what exactly do you mean by your comment and in your own words please?
 
I know teachers, they know they are on the dole. They don't CARE. They have a cushy job, are overpaid, believe the system cheats student, know it, and do nothing about...

My wife left for work this morning at 5:30 and is just about to head home. Nice, cushy, 14 1/2 hour day there. Maybe some teachers work the system, but most I have known put in at least 60-70 hours a week and don't make a ton of money.
 
I'll pipe up here.

Some of it, yes (for me anyway, though the question was posed to TW).

Though I find it would hurt my cause to waste my time ripping down RP, so I don't.

Provoking such actions seem irresponsible (or if not necessarily irresponsible... certainly an in the heat of debate kinda moment).

This is not directed at you, Constituent.

I think people who throw around provocative statements such as "your archist crap", or denouncing anyone and everyone here who believes in ending up with ANY government whatsoever, is irresponsible as all hell.

We either figure out how to work together, or we will kill off any opposition to the agenda that we ALL hate. Sometimes I wonder if that is the goal of a few around here.
 
Based on your gang's historic track record of reducing the governments ANY. I'd say the NWO and the status quo have few if ANY worries about you. :rolleyes:
You may not realize the fact that if not for those who have fought this crap for many years, we would have totally slid into world government long before now. Imagine what could have been done if those sitting on the couch complaining, would've gotten up off their asses and helped.

No, I've read Ron's archive on LRC. You may want to do it sometime, but most probably not. :(
I've been reading his stuff since the late 70's. And YOU? :p ;)
 
Last edited:
<B><FONT size=1>Based on your gang's historic track record of reducing the governments ANY, I'd say the NWO and the status quo have few if ANY worries about you.

And what do they have to fear from anarchists, whose rhetoric actually increases the pace at which government grows every time an anarch opens his mouth?

Im pretty sure baby jesus cries too.
 
You may not realize the fact that if not for those who have fought this crap for many years, we would have totally slid into world government long before now. Imagine what could have been done if those sitting on the couch complaining, would've gotten up off their asses and helped.


I've been reading his stuff since the late 70's. And YOU? :p ;)
Gee, I never realized that you controlled the NWO agenda and timeline. :rolleyes:

I came around to Ron later, previously I was reading better stuff.<IMHO> Mises, Hayek, Rothbard, Lefevre, etc.. Ron seems to really like several of them too. ;)
 
Question: Do you categorize Ron Paul's words and writings as "archist crap" too?

Answer: No, I've read Ron's archive on LRC. You may want to do it sometime, but most probably not. :(

TW, I wanted to ask you more about this. Ron Paul is not an anarchist, that's clear, yet you don't consider his writings, "archist crap". Ron Paul IS an archiist, since he believes in a limited constitutional government, so what is it that allows you to give him an exemption from your denouncement?

I guess I find it strange, because a whole lot of us here agree with Ron. So, why the insults?
 
Gee, I never realized that you controlled the NWO agenda and timeline. :rolleyes:
What's so hard to understand, TW? If these guys are not opposed, their agenda will be implemented that much quicker.

I came around to Ron later, previously I was reading better stuff.<IMHO> Mises, Hayek, Rothbard, Lefevre, etc.. Ron seems to really like several of them too. ;)
I haven't read Lefevre, but I have read quite a lot of Mises, Hayek, Bastiat, etc. Only a couple of Rothbard's books though.
 
Get there and I'll be more than THRILLED to explain it ALL to you ..... AGAIN.

Great question for you to answer too.<IMHO> I'm pretty confident that you find a whole lot of things strange, based on our past experiences.

I asked you a question. Is your response that you refuse to answer? AGAIN.
 
Back
Top