"Some People Just Need To Be Killed"

sevin

Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2008
Messages
4,648
I logged into facebook and my brother had posted this article: Assassin-in-Chief. This conversation was below it:

Neo-con: I am a conservative and I agree with killing the piece of shit. As a matter of fact I would kill every terrorist foreign or domestic. The only difference is I wouldn't advertise it I would just do it.

My awesome mom: “First they came for the Communists, but I was not a Communist so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Socialists and the Trade Unionists, but I was neither, so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Jews, but I was not a Jew so I did not speak out. And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me.” -Martin Niemoeller

My brother: I understand the sentiment Dan, just think it sets a dangerous precedent for the President to decide something like that unilaterally. Now if military command was looking for various people who are considered dangerous leaders, that's different. I get the 'cut off the head' kind of strategy... but in the right hands...

Neo-con: Agree. And don't believe for a minute he did it on his own. Although he wants everyone to think he did I doubt it. His problem is he can't shut his mouth. Some people just need to be killed and the American public doesn't need to know how it happens, why or by whom. As long as they are dead.

/end of conversation

This is what we're up against.
 
you should have said what if he himself is labeled a terrorist by the government? no trial?
 
you should have said what if he himself is labeled a terrorist by the government? no trial?

Doesn't work- these people NEVER can grasp the idea that THEY could ever be a target for State Sanctioned Murder. This sort will not see the light until it is their home or auto targeted for a civil forfeiture, until they get a tax lien slapped on every asset & must prove they don't owe or come across a cop having a pissy day who just NEEDS to taser/shot/beat senseless a civilian and get the treatment only to be told by all of their neoconned friends "you must have done something to deserve it. officer friend would never strike without a valid legal reason"
 
BTW as to the 'quiet murder' approach- it seems to work.................all those bio-warfare scientists dead after the anthrax attacks and little to no public stir.
 
The sad thing is that many of the people claim to be christian--the sadder part is a lot of alleged Christian leaders agree to this murder.

It isn't self-defense when you unilaterally strike! It's the same equivalent as shooting someone in the street because YOU thought they may attack and harm you, just because the person gave you a dirty look.

These type people...unless you can clearly get through to them, their minds are completely made up because they have been fed a daily diet of lies!! The only solution is to try to get to them to see that government has lied to them in the past and they continue to lie in the present.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/gee/gee17.html
http://www.goodreads.com/shelf/show/government-lies
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/smedleywarisracket.shtml

"The men the American people admire most extravagantly are the most daring liars; the men they detest most violently are those who try to tell them the truth."
~H. L. Mencken

"Anyone who has proclaimed violence his method inexorably must choose lying as his principle." ~ Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

"A lie told often enough becomes the truth." ~Lenin (1870 - 1924)

"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it..............The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State."
~Joseph Goebbels, German Minister of Propaganda, 1933-1945
 
I logged into facebook and my brother had posted this article: Assassin-in-Chief.


obama_drone_ap.001.jpg



President Obama touted the killing of U.S. citizen Anwar al-Awlaki in a drone strike in Yemen September 30, but Congressman Ron Paul has raised constitutional questions of whether the President can become judge, jury and executioner — in essence, an assassination — for alleged criminals.​


Awlaki Killing: Does America Need Courts, Juries, or Trials Any More?


Thomas R. Eddlem | The New American
01 October 2011
 
The silver lining in all of this is that it literally forces the Constitution to the forefront of the debate. Just like a large ship, it is going to be hard to turn it quickly. The debate needs to happen. We eventually will turn the ship. Be vigilant and educate the "fuck yeah" Americans. We have lots of work to do.
 
I am sure there are many people the government had killed without disclosing what they did. In this case, the killing of a terrorist news is supposed to make the OBama administration looks good. Don't you think it odd that Obama Administration succeeds in killing two notorious terrorists in a span of a couple of months. something that Bush Administration failed to do for years.
 
I am sure there are many people the government had killed without disclosing what they did. In this case, the killing of a terrorist news is supposed to make the OBama administration looks good. Don't you think it odd that Obama Administration succeeds in killing two notorious terrorists in a span of a couple of months. something that Bush Administration failed to do for years.



People need to read 1984-- Emmanuel Goldstein! There is always a boogeyman in a psychological war!
 
Neo-con: Agree. And don't believe for a minute he did it on his own. Although he wants everyone to think he did I doubt it. His problem is he can't shut his mouth. Some people just need to be killed and the American public doesn't need to know how it happens, why or by whom. As long as they are dead.

This is what we're up against.

Who watches the Watchmen?
 
Lunacy. People really believe the state is like a little god. And why would a god need oversight? Your brother is also incorrect to suggest it would be okay for the military to do it. It's not okay for any part of the government to just "mark" someone. We have civil liberties protections precisely to prevent this kind of thing.
 
You know, when I see all those docs on the History Channel about Nazi Germany, I have to laugh at the armchair historians who somehow think that all those Germans just made pledges to the dark side, sold thier souls to the Devil and loved evil.
No, the sad fact is, those German people thought what they were doing was right, patriotic. Only until they woke up in the rubble did they realize what had happened.
There is nothing worse than good people hookwinked into believing what they are doing is good, when in fact it contains the seeds of pure evil.
How, after almost 70 years after that alful regime was destroyed, can Americans applaud the same kind of evil the Germans embraced?
 
If we kill them all, then will we finally be safe?

Well, since the logic seems to be, "they attacked us for our freedoms" so we'll take away all freedom, it stands to reason that if we kill everybody, then we'll really be safe.
 
That.

You know, when I see all those docs on the History Channel about Nazi Germany, I have to laugh at the armchair historians who somehow think that all those Germans just made pledges to the dark side, sold thier souls to the Devil and loved evil.
No, the sad fact is, those German people thought what they were doing was right, patriotic. Only until they woke up in the rubble did they realize what had happened.
There is nothing worse than good people hookwinked into believing what they are doing is good, when in fact it contains the seeds of pure evil.
How, after almost 70 years after that alful regime was destroyed, can Americans applaud the same kind of evil the Germans embraced?
 
Some people just need to be killed and the American public doesn't need to know how it happens, why or by whom. As long as they are dead.

There's no fixing that kind of stupid, I'm sorry.
 
Some people just need to be killed and the American public doesn't need to know how it happens, why or by whom. As long as they are dead.
Makes sense. Once the ten remaining terrorists are killed, we'll be able to move on to gang members, drug users, flag burners, and homeless people.
 
Didn't DHS say that people with RP bumper stickers were possible terrorists? Should they be assassinated? In fact RP should bring that up in the next debate when he is questioned on it.
 
Back
Top