So...what's the criteria for the Jan 28 debate?

Brett85 said:
So Fox still hasn't released the criteria for the next debate yet?
Click to expand...



They are still deciding, and want to be careful after Rand's protest of the last debate. Expect criteria to be announced later this week.

I doubt the criteria will be any easier than the last debate.
 
TheNewYorker said:
They are still deciding, and want to be careful after Rand's protest of the last debate. Expect criteria to be announced later this week.

I doubt the criteria will be any easier than the last debate.
Click to expand...

My money is still on one quarter of one point more than whatever Rand is polling at at the time.
 
Foreigner said:
Let's hope he continues polling at least some in Iowa. Somebody needs to be competing for Ted Cruz's base if we are going to win.
Click to expand...

Not enough data to say for sure yet, but what looks to be happening in Iowa is Trump and Cruz attack each other, Cruz loses support to Rand and Rubio.
 
Without some crooked manipulation of actual poll results (we cannot dismiss),
it is unlikely that Fox will be able to exclude Rand this time. That would be a minor
win for Rand, surely to be discriminated against in the talk time. When you're that
ignored in the talk time you have to interject which can make you appear desperate
or impolite. So the game will continue one way or another. The only way it doesn't is
if Rand finishes Top Four in Iowa and NH then they will have to let him talk more.
 
squirl22 said:
I can't believe Carson is still polling anything.
Click to expand...

Carson still retains a loyal evangelical base, which is what originally helped organically build his momentum, despite of the media not covering him or paying attention to him in the debates. In some polls he still virtually matches Rubio or Cruz. He may not recover the high numbers he had, but will still carry at least high single digits in IA, as he is doing now.
 
rich34 said:
If they truly wanna stop Trump from winning the whole damn election they must include Paul and allow his true support to be shown . He is imo the only shot they have at fighting another day. If Trump wins Iowa this thing could get ugly very fast. Sure they can take a gamble on Cruz and even more remotely Rubio but they must know that only Paul has the boots on the ground to beat Trump in Iowa. They can more easily discredit a Paul win than they can a Trump win. If the GOP wants to beat Trump it has to start with Paul winning Iowa giving them them the ammo to say Trump is just a paper tiger. That or let Trump win Iowa and thus the nomination. I suppose we'll see for real in the next two weeks just how bad the gop elite really despises Trump.. Imo Rand is their only hope at preventing a sweep and then the fight starts from there on out starting in New Hampshire. I sall an ad in WV today of Bush going a Rubio. Hell our primary is not until May. If Trump wins Iowa Bush just wasted a lot of money. I know he don't care but at the same time he's an insider and must know something. I just can't see them letting Trump win Iowa or else it coold likely be over. Rand imo is the only guy with enough boots on the ground to definitely beat Trump. Buckle up folks we're bout to go mud runnin..
Click to expand...

Nothing is worse for them than Rand winning the nomination. Given the choice between him and Trump, they'll choose Trump in a heartbeat.
 
Including Rand and giving him as little time as possible is the best way for them to help him the least.

I almost agree with what someone else said, that Rand's best course of action is to skip the debate and do some alternative anti-debate like last time even if they invite him.
 
erowe1 said:
Including Rand and giving him as little time as possible is the best way for them to help him the least.

I almost agree with what someone else said, that Rand's best course of action is to skip the debate and do some alternative anti-debate like last time even if they invite him.
Click to expand...

We must flood the debate! Inside and outside! A pre-debate rally would be kick-ass just to flex our muscle!! :cool:
 
A Carson volunteer staffer was in a car accident and in the hospital in bad shape. Carson has suspended his campaign for two days to be with the family. This will play well in Iowa...dedication. I don't think Carson is playing a game with it. But two days won't hurt his numbers in that state.

Can Rand tweet from the debate stage? That would be interesting..."Ignore me and millions of people will 'hear' what I have to say anyway."
 
The debate criteria is top secret this time and will be released after the announcement of which candidates made the debate. :rolleyes:

Seriously, though, don't they need to announce the candidates in like 6 days from now or something?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Z
Thomas Massie to Moderate Open Presidential Debate
Replies
12
Views
3K
Brian4Liberty
Brian4Liberty
Anti Federalist
NY State Sen. Liz Krueger (D-28) supports secession of NY-CT-VT-MA to Canada
Replies
14
Views
2K
Matt Collins
Matt Collins
Brian4Liberty
Alex Berenson - The Rand Paul Interview
Replies
1
Views
2K
helenpaul
H
J
Newsmax touts Balanced Budget Amendment, ignores specifics and Founder’s preferred remedy.
Replies
2
Views
617
johnwk
J
Anti Federalist
Troon rocker performing at Sanders rally slammed for "pure evil" song
Replies
12
Views
146
Anti Federalist
Anti Federalist
Back
Top