Should Trump supporters be banned from this forum?

[Brian4Liberty]

You cannot be talking about the long-haired girly-man who sings cheese music over whom women not worth a first look get all gushy in the panties.

Right?

I can't fucking believe I just got sucked into their lame thread. I will attempt to work up the nerve to shoot myself tonight.

Nope. John "I am the Walrus" Bolton:



You must be thinking of Michael Bolton:

 

[William Tell]

Sorry, but I'm getting really annoyed with the Trump supporters and how they act here. All they do is constantly talk about Trump and never offer anything of substance. They're supporting a big government statist who's a sworn enemy of liberty. That makes them enemies of liberty as well. Should we allow enemies of liberty to post here? Thoughts?

Well, they have managed to convince Breitbart reporters that we are supporting Trump instead of Rand. That's about as damaging as it gets I suppose.

 

[erowe1]

Well, they have managed to convince Breitbart reporters that we are supporting Trump instead of Rand. That's about as damaging as it gets I suppose.

Is this true? If so, it's definitely reason enough for banning them.

 

[H. E. Panqui]

...good grief!...does anyone know of any websites where there aren't so many whiners/losers who want to ban people?..

...'politics' is a 'competition of ideas about government'....remember when we were kids and there was some snot-nose who SUCKED in the competition of basketball, baseball, football, etc., and he decided to ban you from his court, take his ball home, etc...?

...it's understandable...the snot-nose was being repeatedly drubbed and he didn't like it...and it was certainly within his rights to cry like a baby and take his ball away...

...but remember how people felt about the thin-skinned, snot-nosed losers...

...it's pathetic and VERY unattractive...

 

[erowe1]

...good grief!...does anyone know of any websites where there aren't so many whiners/losers who want to ban people?..

Yes. Red State comes to mind immediately. As websites go, this one is very tolerant. Personally, I've rarely supported banning people. But it does happen sometimes, and it should. There should be a limit to how much the Trump trolls can get away with here, per the site guidelines as they already are.

 

[Rad]

...good grief!...does anyone know of any websites where there aren't so many whiners/losers who want to ban people?..

...'politics' is a 'competition of ideas about government'....remember when we were kids and there was some snot-nose who SUCKED in the competition of basketball, baseball, football, etc., and he decided to ban you from his court, take his ball home, etc...?

...it's understandable...the snot-nose was being repeatedly drubbed and he didn't like it...and it was certainly within his rights to cry like a baby and take his ball away...

...but remember how people felt about the thin-skinned, snot-nosed losers...

...it's pathetic and VERY unattractive...

We all have boogers in our nose! There is a little Yes vote in all of us if we look deep enough (I hope).

 

[JK/SEA]

i called the cops on these guys a few days ago...did they show up yet?

 

[GunnyFreedom]

Is this true? If so, it's definitely reason enough for banning them.

Yes, it's true. And I agree. I do not, however, hold out much hope that it will actually happen. A not-insignificant part of the reason why Rand Paul is suffering is because people come to the only serious gathering of Ron Paulers left on the Internet, and it looks like we are supporting Trump. News articles are written, and the notion propagates that even the crazy Ron Paul fanatics don't like Rand. At this point, with the Trump supporters free to run amok trashing Rand and promoting Trump, Rand Paul would have been better off in his campaign if this website did not exist.

 

[klamath]

Yes, it's true. And I agree. I do not, however, hold out much hope that it will actually happen. A not-insignificant part of the reason why Rand Paul is suffering is because people come to the only serious gathering of Ron Paulers left on the Internet, and it looks like we are supporting Trump. News articles are written, and the notion propagates that even the crazy Ron Paul fanatics don't like Rand. At this point, with the Trump supporters free to run amok trashing Rand and promoting Trump, Rand Paul would have been better off in his campaign if this website did not exist.

Sad.

 

[H. E. Panqui]

gunny freedom writes: A not-insignificant part of the reason why Rand Paul is suffering is because people come to the only serious gathering of Ron Paulers left on the Internet, and it looks like we are supporting Trump.



c'mon man! ...trump's getting any 'support' from me [IN THE PRIMARY ONLY!!] because he's the most gnarly monkey wrench to throw into the STINKING, ROTTEN, REPUBLICAN PARTY INC. machine...

more gunny: Rand Paul would have been better off in his campaign if this website did not exist.



LOL! ...the only time i find myself sticking up for rand and the republicans (vs. democreeps/liberals) is when i remind people that at least the republicans are giving us 'something that resembles honest 'debate'..i ask them, 'what have your stinking democrats brought us?'...(i love it when the smarter ones look down in shame)

 

[Warrior_of_Freedom]

this election is feeling less like a revolution and more like a routine

 

[Rad]

Sad.

That attitude is sad. Where is the hope for change? We are off to save the world!

You guys need to recruit our Rand Paul girl (she doesn't know it yet) or at least steal her stuff and post her stuff. Have you thought about following Paul around and making your own news? Trump is knocking stuff out of the ball park if you agree with him or not. Rand needs some real good juicy knock your socks off quotes. Ron Paul got news stories because he was controversial like Trump otherwise he was made fun of. Rand just gets put down. There is no controversy. Ron was hard to ignore. He explained blow back to a bunch of rabid crazy people! He had serious supporters too. The type of spirit that threw snow balls at Hannity and put a blimp up in the air. Surely people have skills. They can make videos and stuff, songs, comics, etc. Do crazy stuff to get attention. Where is the O'Paul supporter spirit? The human wrecking ball is taking all the oxygen. You guys need to create your own oxygen tank and supply the world with fresh oxygen. I can't believe there isn't a Rand Paul girl video yet. For shame! Surely someone has recording equipment and is adept at it. Surely someone has some toon boom skills and could create a cartoon showing how you are going to deFabian socialize the country by stealing their method of slowly reworking the world into your preferred image. How about a mass hunger strike for Rand Paul? Die for Rand.

How about a Paul fest... we all get drunk and stoned, make out while listening to dubstep, and spread the word of Rand Paul!

If you guys don't want to do anything attention grabbing and exciting you could uhm... (imagine James Earl Jones voice) join me and together we can vote Yes and bring order to this forum .

 

[Warrior_of_Freedom]

The campaign against Trump should be so easy. HEre's my campaign slogan
Dump Trump
there you go, free campaign advice

 

[H. E. Panqui]

rad writes: "....make out while listening to dubstep, and spread the word of Rand Paul!"



....sounds great!...just please inform people that rand is a conservative republican...please...hasn't the word 'libertarian' been shat upon enough already?...

 

[paleocon1]

There are certain people on the RPFs who seriously advocate shooting illegal aliens when they cross the border. Trump supporters are way down the list of people to be concerned about 'round here IMHO.

and that would be different from shooting home invaders just how?

 

[erowe1]

c'mon man! ...trump's getting any 'support' from me [IN THE PRIMARY ONLY!!]

The primary is where you are supposed to be supporting Rand, poop monger.

 

[LibertyEagle]

No you weren't. Not unless you changed your views or just never had any clue what either he or his dad (or for that matter, your namesake Goldwater) ever stood for.

It has seemed like your views shifted much more away from freedom to anti-immigration statism as your years on this forum went on though.

You still don't get it, or maybe you do and you just don't care. If we continue to allow our country to be overrun by illegal aliens, we have no country to save.

Your stance on this is the very same one as the one-worlders who have pushed this illegal invasion. Congrats.

 

[LibertyEagle]

By definition, libertarians have the corner on liberty.

You're kidding, right? lolol

 

[LibertyEagle]

Is this true? If so, it's definitely reason enough for banning them.

If they repeatedly co-opt this website to oppose what it stands for by pushing Trump, to the point that it's practically their entire agenda here, absolutely they should be banned, based on the site guidelines. They should also be banned if they repeatedly make racist remarks.

AuH2O should have been banned months ago.

What about those who advocate things that both Ron and Rand are against, like open borders? In that case, you should have been banned long ago.

 

[erowe1]

You still don't get it, or maybe you do and you just don't care. If we continue to allow our country to be overrun by illegal aliens, we have no country to save.

Your stance on this is the very same one as the one-worlders who have pushed this illegal invasion. Congrats.

You don't get it.

Notice the value system behind your comment. It's about some "country," rather than individuals.