Grandmastersexsay
Banned
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2018
- Messages
- 519
>Asserted that laws against “bigamists, persons cohabiting with more than one woman, and women cohabiting with a bigamist” are unconstitutional. (Page 195)
>Objected to laws against prostitution because “prostitution, as a consensual act between adults, is arguably within the zone of privacy protected by recent constitutional decisions.” (Page 97)
>Demanded that we “firmly reject draft or combat exemption for women,” stating “women must be subject to the draft if men are.”(Page 218)
Agreed.
>Called for reducing the age of consent for sexual acts to people who are “less than 12 years old.” (Page 102)
This one is iffy. I have no problem with it as long as they are postpubesent, and they are both of a somewhat similar age. The latter part being a social construct I picked up in life. The whole intellectual maturity based on age is nonsense. There are plenty of 25 year old girls running around with the intellectual maturity of a rock. If a woman's body has matured to the point where they can give birth, I dont see the issue. That's how we did it for 40,000 years. It's only been different for the last 200-300 years, I'm guessing due to the Puritans. Very few girls are post pubescent at 12, but it does happen. 14 years would seem less shocking.