The south fought for the 10th admendment and threw out 1 thro the 9th admendments for five million americans.
The South should have tried for a legal secession. Firing on Sumter was a big mistake. Then we could have had a discussion on whether states that freely joined the Union could freely leave. No state has yet tried a legal secession.
The South should have tried for a legal secession. Firing on Sumter was a big mistake. Then we could have had a discussion on whether states that freely joined the Union could freely leave. No state has yet tried a legal secession.
And when did the south offer to pay the northern states for the land that they partly paid for in the LA Purchase?
Bingo! Even Lincoln's memorial is a tribute to his fascism.Another thing to consider: Lee, Stewart, Jackson, and many other Confederate Generals were graduates of West point. Before Lincolns' war, one of the textbooks used at West Point was A view of the constitution, by William Rawle(1825). One of the views expressed in this book is that the constitution is that the constitution, by it's very nature, is a voluntary compact among the participating States. The book expresses that without voluntary accession to constitutional authority, the constitution itself becomes obsolete since the primary tenet of the document is representative Republic.
The constitution, within it's core values, is a document outlining a representative Republic that places "we the people" as the primary arbiter of it's own authority. All authority delegated to the federal government originates from authority that We the people willingly give. Every other power is reserved to the States, or to "We the people" ourselves. Therefore, if "We the people", who gave the federal government it's authority willingly and voluntarily, decide that we no longer wish for that government to hold that power, then how could anyone argue that we can't do that?
Lincoln himself saw the fallacy of this argument, and said as much. in 1858, he expressed that
"Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up, and shake off the existing government, and form a new one that suits them better. This is a most valuable - a most sacred right - a right, which we hope and believe, is to liberate the world."
This is the problem with the penchant of people to canonize "St. Abe", they fail to ignore his problems. Lincoln was the architect of the federal beast that those who love liberty fight against every day. From fiat currency and personal income taxes to indefinite detention of prisoners, every government position that is being argued against on this board share a precedent with some policy that Lincoln endorsed first.
I wish I could find somewhere to download this entire speech. I love it.
I know, but I still think it was a mistake to initiate the aggression. Be patient and give the Feds a chance to leave before shooting at them.a unilateral statement saying "we are an independent country now" is a legal secession.
Bingo! Even Lincoln's memorial is a tribute to his fascism.
I know, but I still think it was a mistake to initiate the aggression. Be patient and give the Feds a chance to leave before shooting at them.
I know, but I still think it was a mistake to initiate the aggression. Be patient and give the Feds a chance to leave before shooting at them.
Seceding because of an abusive centralized government would be the ultimate exercise of states' rights. What kind of person comes to the conclusion that an action can't be "states' rights" if the phrase "states' rights" isn't invoked? Also, it is pretty indisputable that Lincoln fought the war over preserving the Union, not for freeing slaves or some altruistic paradise. Read the book.
Many of you said the war had nothing to do with slavery, but according to the review several of the states' declaration of separation's say in the first paragraph that slavery was a major, if not the biggest issue why.