they edited the hell out of it, but i think Dr. Ron Paul still came out on top.
even the worst part, where they cut off his response, still left him sounding humble and straightforward.
remember, we're too connected. we listen to every last syllable trying to guess what joe and jane might think. my gut says they'll like him, just like everybody seems to like him.
Don't let CNN fool you. That's exactly what they want! Ron Paul is in it to win or he would already be out! Think about it. He would of blown all his money on the first few primarys than dropped out, like Tancredo or Richardson. But he's been strategically playing the primarys. He's in it to WIN.........
I just realized how much this benefits us, you remember what they mentioned, THE MONEY BOMB, we got free national television advertisement for the MLK money bomb
This could also be a strategy on Paul's part. Think about it. If he gave the MSM the sense he was weak and about to throw in the towel then they wouldn't put as much energy into attacking him between now and "Super Tuesday".
i noticed something odd.
they asked him what is was about or something
and he said "well.. i think its about me... and the things i have done"
before he has stated its always been about the message, never him.
this had to been either edited or he has something planned.
he would never say its about him.
This is why the campaign needs to be running national ads on every news channel. Either Dr. Paul defines himself or he lets the MSM define him (as a no hope loser). Networks can't edit ads and they can't refuse to air ones from the campaign.
Plus, if Paul's supporters were seeing his ads regularly on TV, they would be donating a lot more money.