Ron Needs to Have a Copy of the Constitution with him at Debates

[walt]

He needs to hold up the prop when he says the word.

Then he should ask every Amercian voter to read it in the next breath.

please discuss with HQ and bump as necessary

 

[jrich4rpaul]

Better yet, he needs to bring a copy of the 9/11 Report and quote from it after every one of Rudy's answers. Especially when he says "They attack us because we're free."

 

[TruckinMike]

yes, a copy of the 911 report and he also needs to have a copy of the Constitution for each candidate and pass it out to them on stage.

TM

 

[jrich4rpaul]

The Constitution will come in handy for when Mittens talks about asking his attorneys to tell him what to do as president.

 

[Conza88]

Nah. Thats Kucinich's gag. He has the magna carta, blah blah blah etc. too
Didn't see Colbert's show about it? haha.

No, Ron Paul has the constitution MEMORISED. Bet you he could recite it word for word... he's been working for it, for the last 30 years.+

 

[constitutional]

Ron Paul doesn't need a constitution. Lets not be drastic. Constitution isn't always the answer. Ron Paul decisions make sense.

 

[Brinck Slattery]

meh, props are kind of bush league. Dr. Paul knows the Constitution well enough, if anything there should be a Constitution pop quiz in the next debate...

 

[Wyurm]

meh, props are kind of bush league. Dr. Paul knows the Constitution well enough, if anything there should be a Constitution pop quiz in the next debate...

I get what the OP is saying. Alot of people on this forum won't get it and I know exactly why. All the repeated cries for a youtube when Ron Paul appears on a show explain to me exactly why people here won't get this. See, most people have become highly visual due to excessive TV viewing, those of us who have broken the hold of the box no longer have this problem.

What this means is that visual aids improve the audience's ability to connect with the speaker allowing them not only to hear the message, but to see proof of that message. For example, there is an excellent video of a preacher explaining the Fed http://video.google.com/videoplay?d...198&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=4

Note that he pulls out actual money rather than only talking about it. Why? because this is a visual aid that re-enforces the point he is trying to make. If used correctly, it can be an extremely powerful way to get a point across and make it stick in the mind of the viewer. Its also why hit-pieces usually contain badly-taken pictures of the target of the article. The key is just to not go overboard with it. It should be used sparingly.