RNC calls 'frivolous' lawsuit by Ron Paul supporters

I'd much rather tread into dangerous territory with my head held high than sit back with my head hung low.

But that's me and I'm not known for having good sense. ;)

It's kind of like: I would rather die on my feet then live on my knees.
 
I'd much rather tread into dangerous territory with my head held high than sit back with my head hung low.

But that's me and I'm not known for having good sense. ;)


Lets just say I've tread into more than a few firefights in multiple parts of the world. It's not personal apprehension I have, it's organizational. If this is played right, we get to have influence, maybe even a nominee, played wrong, and we get squat divided by zero. There is always a chance that someone will go off reservation and do something stupid.

I'm going to assume that all will be explained at the festival.
 
No candidate winning in the polls will ever expose any corrupt activities regarding the process while it is benefitting them, and any candidate losing in the polls can not speak about fraud and manipulation at the polls without being painted as a "sore loser." This dysfunctional thinking that the media perpetuates is maddening since it effectively blocks any serious inquiry.
 
Lets just say I've tread into more than a few firefights in multiple parts of the world. It's not personal apprehension I have, it's organizational. If this is played right, we get to have influence, maybe even a nominee, played wrong, and we get squat divided by zero. There is always a chance that someone will go off reservation and do something stupid.

I'm going to assume that all will be explained at the festival.

A little apprehension is good and healthy. But we are in a fight - there has been blatant disregard for rule of law in our country, and this is a worth fighting for cause of using the law to bring the criminals down. I am very excited about what is in store.

By the way, you get squat divided by zero if you don't try, every time, guaranteed.
 
I think The People might actually begin to rebel at that point. When the voters actually realize that their vote does not count they will wake up and be angry.

I think your wrong. There is enough evidence to support that the Government doesn't work for the people NOW and most people could give a rat's ass as long as the candidate has the right letter next to their name.
 
How on Earth can a case that is able to provide prima facie evidence of widespread manipulation, fraud, intimidation, and misrepresentation be construed as being frivolous?
 
How on Earth can a case that is able to provide prima facie evidence of widespread manipulation, fraud, intimidation, and misrepresentation be construed as being frivolous?

It hasn't.

The respondent has dubbed it frivolous.
 
I hope Benton gets fired. There is something about him that irks the hell out of me. That coupled with the fact that he is horrible at his job.

/null
 
Last edited:
Jesse Benton and John Tate cannot be allowed to have any official office with the Campaign for Liberty after the Convention.

As Tom Woods, have said we need new leadership at C4L. If not, I predict many Liberty Supporters will not renew their memberships.
 
I am directly involved with this case. I am a constitutionalist, with over 30 years of study in this particular venue. I have been a member here for quite a while. I cannot believe that, when someone FINALLY does something to stand up to all the BS of the RNC, people want to tear it down. This case is definitely VERY NON FRIVOLOUS, and yes, we do have a mountain, of evidence, it has already been accepted by the courts, and we are very serious about the allegations we have made.

The fraud and unfair practices that have been carried out mentioned in this lawsuit are very substantial, and very provable. I am not here to debate that. I KNOW the case is not frivoulous, I AM READING the literally 100's of legal, signed afidavits that we are getting, filing, and submitting.

This case does go further than the election. It is about protecting what few rights we have left. It is about purging the system of crooks, theives and liars, and getting back to honest elections, and holding accountable those responsible for physically abusing Ron Paul supporters and American citizens. IF one thinks this lawsuit is frivolous, then the rights we have, must also seem frivolous as well, THAT is what this case is about. Thank you and have a nice day.

Jerry E. Davis, Legal researcher, LFRP.
 
Last edited:
Jesse Benton and John Tate cannot be allowed to have any official office with the Campaign for Liberty after the Convention.

As Tom Woods, have said we need new leadership at C4L. If not, I predict many Liberty Supporters will not renew their memberships.

What are you blaming them for NOW?
 
Thanks for chiming in Jerry!



I am directly involved with this case. I am a constitutionalist, with over 30 years of study in this particular venue. I have been a member here for quite a while. I cannot believe that, when someone FINALLY does something to stand up to all the BS of the RNC, people want to tear it down. This case is definitely VERY NON FRIVOLOUS, and yes, we do have a mountain, of evidence, it has already been accepted by the courts, and we are very serious about the allegations we have made.

The fraud and unfair practices that have been carried out mentioned in this lawsuit are very substantial, and very provable. I am not here to debate that. I KNOW the case is not frivoulous, I AM READING the literally 100's of legal, signed afidavits that we are getting, filing, and submitting.

This case does go further than the election. It is about protecting what few rights we have left. It is about purging the system of crooks, theives and liars, and getting back to honest elections, and holding accountable those responsible for physically abusing Ron Paul supporters and American citizens. IF one thinks this lawsuit is frivolous, then the rights we have, must also seem frivolous as well, THAT is what this case is about. Thank you and have a nice day.

Jerry E. Davis, Legal researcher, LFRP.
 
It's reassuring to know we have well-motivated intellectuals behind this suit, who know their business. These updates really get our fire burning.
 
I am directly involved with this case. I am a constitutionalist, with over 30 years of study in this particular venue. I have been a member here for quite a while. I cannot believe that, when someone FINALLY does something to stand up to all the BS of the RNC, people want to tear it down. This case is definitely VERY NON FRIVOLOUS, and yes, we do have a mountain, of evidence, it has already been accepted by the courts, and we are very serious about the allegations we have made.

The fraud and unfair practices that have been carried out mentioned in this lawsuit are very substantial, and very provable. I am not here to debate that. I KNOW the case is not frivoulous, I AM READING the literally 100's of legal, signed afidavits that we are getting, filing, and submitting.

This case does go further than the election. It is about protecting what few rights we have left. It is about purging the system of crooks, theives and liars, and getting back to honest elections, and holding accountable those responsible for physically abusing Ron Paul supporters and American citizens. IF one thinks this lawsuit is frivolous, then the rights we have, must also seem frivolous as well, THAT is what this case is about. Thank you and have a nice day.

Jerry E. Davis, Legal researcher, LFRP.

Thanks . This tickles my professional imagination.
Could you keep us updated? Is there any link to those affidavits and other evidence?
So many questions :rolleyes:.

Dont give up. This can be done. People in Croatia did it. You can too.

Good luck.
 
Can someone explain why we want all delegates to be able to vote their conscience instead of by their state party rules or state laws? If this is the scenario we want, what's to stop the establishment from making it impossible for grassroots supporters to become delegates in the future? There are already many states where it's notoriously difficult to become a delegate. Why won't other states just adopt the same policies to ensure that their candidate will always win.

I'd have sought a different remedy. I think the fraud/chronic shenanigans bit disenfranchising voters is important, but I don't know if they are maximizing the remedy properly. I'd make the states parties as accomplices through favoring the parties and make them put Ron on the ballots for November, myself, if that is possible. It is the fraud and disenfranchisement of all the party doesn't approve that is the big issue to me.

Me too. I would have sought the removal of Romney from eligibility to be the candidate.

That's where I think the delegates need to go with the lawsuit.

One thing that I do look forward to, however, is the RICO lawsuit to follow. I wonder how many people in the GOP who cheated in the primaries will find their new living arrangements in Federal prison "frivolous."
 
I am directly involved with this case. I am a constitutionalist, with over 30 years of study in this particular venue. I have been a member here for quite a while. I cannot believe that, when someone FINALLY does something to stand up to all the BS of the RNC, people want to tear it down. This case is definitely VERY NON FRIVOLOUS, and yes, we do have a mountain, of evidence, it has already been accepted by the courts, and we are very serious about the allegations we have made.

The fraud and unfair practices that have been carried out mentioned in this lawsuit are very substantial, and very provable. I am not here to debate that. I KNOW the case is not frivoulous, I AM READING the literally 100's of legal, signed afidavits that we are getting, filing, and submitting.

This case does go further than the election. It is about protecting what few rights we have left. It is about purging the system of crooks, theives and liars, and getting back to honest elections, and holding accountable those responsible for physically abusing Ron Paul supporters and American citizens. IF one thinks this lawsuit is frivolous, then the rights we have, must also seem frivolous as well, THAT is what this case is about. Thank you and have a nice day.

Jerry E. Davis, Legal researcher, LFRP.

GO JERRY!!!!!! Thanks for letting us know!!! (Not that anyone here really questioned it... At least I hope not... Haven't finished reading the whole thread yet.)
 
Last edited:
I am directly involved with this case. I am a constitutionalist, with over 30 years of study in this particular venue. I have been a member here for quite a while. I cannot believe that, when someone FINALLY does something to stand up to all the BS of the RNC, people want to tear it down. This case is definitely VERY NON FRIVOLOUS, and yes, we do have a mountain, of evidence, it has already been accepted by the courts, and we are very serious about the allegations we have made.

The fraud and unfair practices that have been carried out mentioned in this lawsuit are very substantial, and very provable. I am not here to debate that. I KNOW the case is not frivoulous, I AM READING the literally 100's of legal, signed afidavits that we are getting, filing, and submitting.

This case does go further than the election. It is about protecting what few rights we have left. It is about purging the system of crooks, theives and liars, and getting back to honest elections, and holding accountable those responsible for physically abusing Ron Paul supporters and American citizens. IF one thinks this lawsuit is frivolous, then the rights we have, must also seem frivolous as well, THAT is what this case is about. Thank you and have a nice day.

Jerry E. Davis, Legal researcher, LFRP.

Excellent! May you and your team both take down this raging bull as a skilled matador and live to be a thousand years old, sir.
 
Back
Top