RIP: Charlie Kirk Assassinated at Event in Utah

 


AOC DEFAMES Charlie Kirk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTaomKZnxr8
{Actual Justice Warrior | 19 September 2025}

In this video, I discuss Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez defaming Charlie Kirk on the house floor in order to signal to her base which has been cheering his assassination since it happened.

Sources:
 


It is not a 1% lunatic fringe of basement dwelling Buffalo Bills.

At the height of the SDS and the Weathermen and campus revolution and the Black Panthers in the 60s and 70s, I don't think you would have seen similar poll numbers.
 
Last edited:
Well, you have to admit that a huge chunk of the mainstream and "alternative" media is controlled by wealthy interests. And you have to admit that those same wealthy interests can afford to rent large numbers of politicians, and don't seem to mind doing it. And you have to admit that those same politicians aren't being paid right now not to exercise government's muscle.

So, yeah. Most media is down with government action. In other words, left.

In this case, "left" includes Donald Trump. But I can't help that.
Your description seems to imply that capitalism is "left" and leads to "left" action.
 
All I see is a cloud of internet FUDDD.

Yeah, how many alternative conspiracy hypothesis do we have at this point?

- Baseball style signals next to Charlie.
- Palm gun in front row.
- Shot from another closer window.
- Unknown shots from different angles (including shot from behind).
- Shots from less powerful weapons.
- Exploding microphone attached to his shirt (ala Israeli designed exploding pagers).
- Secret trap door under his feet.
- What am I missing?


Reminds of me of so many other conspiracies, including more recently the Trump Russia impeachment. "Look, we have this list of 99 things that look suspicious. None of them have any proof or confirmation, but look, it's 99 different things!"
 
What you're seeing in that poll is a measurement of whether or not the person being polled will believe the Trump administration based solely on faith.

It's natural that it would skew as shown.

More like the natural tendency to not blame their own side, facts be damned. BAMN!
 
Which facts?

Doesn't matter. Applies to any situation.

In this specific case, the closet things we have to "facts" are family members saying that the shooter and his roommate were leftist lovers. Then you have whatever levels of govt has said the same thing, whether the Utah Police, the FBI, or Trump himself (not that I have heard Trump get into any details, but he probably has at this point).

Just rejecting that the shooter was a trans inspired leftist "because Trump" is one motivator. Likewise, rejecting because they don't want to admit it was their (or your) side is another motivator. Neither are relying on facts.
 
Doesn't matter. Applies to any situation.
Great.

In this specific case, the closet things we have to "facts" are family members saying that the shooter and his roommate were leftist lovers. Then you have whatever levels of govt has said the same thing, whether the Utah Police, the FBI, or Trump himself (not that I have heard Trump get into any details, but he probably has at this point).
You mean the fact that government officials have said those "facts," first via leaks (that they retweeted) and then from a podium?

Are you always so accepting of such "facts?"

Maybe you just generally have a lot of faith in the FBI?

Just rejecting that the shooter was a trans inspired leftist "because Trump" is one motivator. Likewise, rejecting because they don't want to admit it was their (or your) side is another motivator. Neither are relying on facts.
"Trans inspired" is an amazing phrase.
 
Back
Top