RIP: Charlie Kirk Assassinated at Event in Utah

Maybe but seems a bit convoluted

Occam's cucumber tells me that simplest answer is usually the correct one, and simplest answer is the dude is leftist nutjob

If reports are accurate, and a family member did say that they were lovers (and leftists), then that would add some credibility to official reports that say pretty much the same thing.

------

"...Wisconsin Right Now reached two family members of Twiggs by phone on Sept. 13. The first family member declined to comment and hung up. The second family member confirmed the information in the Post and Daily Mail stories but also provided additional details to Wisconsin Right Now that no one has reported yet.

For starters, the family member – who has not spoken to other members of the news media – alleged that Twiggs harbored animosity toward conservatives and Christians, confirmed that Twiggs was transgender/transitioning, and said that Robinson was allegedly Twiggs’ boyfriend.

“He (Lance Twiggs) is very angry with anyone who is supportive of conservative ideals and Christian values,” alleged the family member.

“As far as I know, he was not going by another name. I just know he was in the process of transitioning. I know he was trying to take different medications,” alleged the relative of Lance, whom the family member had avoided for about four years out of concern over Twiggs’ alleged temperament.'"

 
I read the whole text string and then someone mentioned this theory (i.e. "cover for the lover") and I agree.

It's the most simple explanation for the detailed narration. It looks very planned and rehearsed.

When I first read it, the thing that jumped out as ridiculous was the "please delete this". Who in 2025 who plays video games and watches TV would think these texts could simply be "deleted" for a guy wanted for killing a MAGA saint on live tv? Answer: no one. So "delete this exchange" is a smokescreen to make the reader believe that the writer is somehow ignorant of this fact.

Plus, the use of full and complete sentences with punctuation smells of a rehearsed transcription from a handwritten note, but maybe that's a stretch. This also explains his non-cooperation with police. If the text exchange is genuine then he obviously knows he already confessed. So why not cooperate with police? Well, if the text was rehearsed in order to protect the lover, he doesn't want to risk contradicting the roomates story when he is inevitably interrogated.

Yeah, that seems to be the most likely scenario at this point. The text conversation very well could have been a contingency plan. If it looked like he was going to get caught, have the pre-planned text conversation for the benefit of the police and court to save the room-mate.

Interesting considering that many in the deep state Obama Admin used the same tactic of sending messages that were simply CYA or fake exculpatory evidence for future investigations. I forget the exact names of who was doing that. IIRC, Peter Strzok come to mind, but there were other officials who did the same thing. Susan Powers maybe? Then we had Fauci and friends and all of the fake shenanigans they undertook to cover their malfeasance.
 
If I were to speculate as to why they released still pictures and not video, it's because we would see the "shooter" bending his knees and climbing the stairs without a limp.

 
Last edited:
Haven't watched it yet.

500,000 views in a day.

Based on the comments, well, you get the idea.


 
So, the father isn't a former Deputy?

I don't know that it makes a difference, everyone seems to be reporting that he was.


HURRICANE, Utah (KUTV) — The Washington County Sheriff's Office clarified the suspected gunman in the death of Charlie Kirk has no relation to a retired deputy affiliated with the office.

"Deputy Matt Robinson is NOT connected or related to the individual apprehended last night," the statement read, in part.
 
Last edited:
Those texts read like one guy who is guilty of some kind of collusion, and likes to read gothic romance novels, and has both phones, and is writing a narrative to cover his/her/their/its ass while also making it look like he/she/they/it were an object of great devotion by picking up one phone, then the other, and creating a solitaire "conversation".
 
Last edited:
Of course the shooter is aiming center mass, bullet hits body armor on his chest and ricochets into his jugular. Deranged people promoting 2nd shooter conspiracy theories are really sick in the head.
 
68ca5343e1ab0.webp


68ca2f6a2f087.webp


68ca0d564c694.webp
 
Why? Because you think you can tell a shoulder strap buckle from a nipple?
if you pull up the photo I linked, here are my thoughts:
The bulges on Charlie were off to this right shoulder, like a hose or bag, and across his left upper body
the protrusion on his back is too much for normal posture on a seat. You can see the seat line, it is too far away.
The nipple (or buckle) is protruding because of the stretching of his shirt, it is pulling on his left upper torso, across the shoulder.
That is a different but possibly connected piece (through his back) than the bulge on his upper left. His shirt falls straight
under the nipple because he has no gut. But the shirt quickly breaks again because of his position. No BPV/BA worn is going
to be so shallow and short. If he were more upright his whole belly would be exposed.
He's got stuff on for sure but it's not body armor, and you can see the upper left bulge on the other angle also.
One might add that if he was so careful as to wear a bpv other security measures would have been taken also.
 
if you pull up the photo I linked, here are my thoughts:
The bulges on Charlie were off to this right shoulder, like a hose or bag, and across his left upper body
the protrusion on his back is too much for normal posture on a seat. You can see the seat line, it is too far away.
The nipple (or buckle) is protruding because of the stretching of his shirt, it is pulling on his left upper torso, across the shoulder.
That is a different but possibly connected piece (through his back) than the bulge on his upper left. His shirt falls straight
under the nipple because he has no gut. But the shirt quickly breaks again because of his position. No BPV/BA worn is going
to be so shallow and short. If he were more upright his whole belly would be exposed.
He's got stuff on for sure but it's not body armor, and you can see the upper left bulge on the other angle also.
One might add that if he was so careful as to wear a bpv other security measures would have been taken also.

It was the wire under his shirt. When his body involuntarily jerked from the bullet-impact, it caused all that ruffling of the shirt. If he were wearing a vest underneath, it would have printed at least a little during the previous Q&A since it's just thin T-shirt material -- to my knowledge, there is no printing.
 
Back
Top