Maybe but seems a bit convoluted
Occam's cucumber tells me that simplest answer is usually the correct one, and simplest answer is the dude is leftist nutjob
I read the whole text string and then someone mentioned this theory (i.e. "cover for the lover") and I agree.
It's the most simple explanation for the detailed narration. It looks very planned and rehearsed.
When I first read it, the thing that jumped out as ridiculous was the "please delete this". Who in 2025 who plays video games and watches TV would think these texts could simply be "deleted" for a guy wanted for killing a MAGA saint on live tv? Answer: no one. So "delete this exchange" is a smokescreen to make the reader believe that the writer is somehow ignorant of this fact.
Plus, the use of full and complete sentences with punctuation smells of a rehearsed transcription from a handwritten note, but maybe that's a stretch. This also explains his non-cooperation with police. If the text exchange is genuine then he obviously knows he already confessed. So why not cooperate with police? Well, if the text was rehearsed in order to protect the lover, he doesn't want to risk contradicting the roomates story when he is inevitably interrogated.
Haven't watched it yet.
500,000 views in a day.
Based on the comments, well, you get the idea.
"body armor" ? methinks not.
if you pull up the photo I linked, here are my thoughts:Why? Because you think you can tell a shoulder strap buckle from a nipple?
if you pull up the photo I linked, here are my thoughts:
The bulges on Charlie were off to this right shoulder, like a hose or bag, and across his left upper body
the protrusion on his back is too much for normal posture on a seat. You can see the seat line, it is too far away.
The nipple (or buckle) is protruding because of the stretching of his shirt, it is pulling on his left upper torso, across the shoulder.
That is a different but possibly connected piece (through his back) than the bulge on his upper left. His shirt falls straight
under the nipple because he has no gut. But the shirt quickly breaks again because of his position. No BPV/BA worn is going
to be so shallow and short. If he were more upright his whole belly would be exposed.
He's got stuff on for sure but it's not body armor, and you can see the upper left bulge on the other angle also.
One might add that if he was so careful as to wear a bpv other security measures would have been taken also.