RIP: Charlie Kirk Assassinated at Event in Utah

Yea and the text messages probably did happen as they were written

I'm just saying the text messages are a theatrical performance to provide cover for his queerdo lover

Right.

So either this was an actual text exchange between the two, I don't think Robinson is clever enough to cover literally every aspect.

Or it's something completely fabricated and presented by the authorities as fact.
 


"My cherished darling, the elderly gentleman provided a fortuitous diversion of exquisite charm.

And, lo, the interrogations of my esteemed father and venerable grandfather endure with unrelenting tenacity.

I shall orchestrate my swift departure, upon reclaiming my generationally unique shooting iron; yet, alas, a constabulary carriage persists in irksome vigil.

Recall that bygone era when I meticulously inscribed sigils upon my projectiles with artisanal fervor?

Truly, those words were crafted in playful jest.

My dearest love, obliterate this colloquy from the chronicles of recollection and permit no living soul to hear its whispered secrets."
 
Last edited:
Or it's something completely fabricated and presented by the authorities as fact.

Maybe but seems a bit convoluted

Occam's cucumber tells me that simplest answer is usually the correct one, and simplest answer is the dude is leftist nutjob
 
Why do elaborate conspiracies have to be constructed to explain an event like this when there are millions of Marxists and Jacobins out there, just like this?

Ready, willing, and happy to see "us" killed.

Did people in power promote and encourage this, yes, without question..

This is LIHOP, just like 9/11.

 
Why do elaborate conspiracies have to be constructed to explain an event like this when there are millions of Marxists and Jacobins out there, just like this?
Yeah, I'm feeling this, too. Like with everything else, I think we intuitively know we're not getting the full story. And it's easy to start to fill in the blanks, especially when we have preconceived notions.

I'm not ready to cross off the conspiracy possibilities, yet. But I'd like to see some evidence before jumping to conclusions. I'd also like to see more evidence to show me that's NOT the case.
 
Why do elaborate conspiracies have to be constructed to explain an event like this when there are millions of Marxists and Jacobins out there, just like this?

Ready, willing, and happy to see "us" killed.

Did people in power promote and encourage this, yes, without question..

This is LIHOP, just like 9/11.



It's worse than LIHOP, it's (h/t Brian4LIberty for looking up the term) "stochastic terrorism". Basically, keep throwing horsehoes until you get a ringer. Except, you're not just throwing one horseshoe at a time, you're throwing millions or billions of them through a hurricane of AI-curated rage-content and doom-porn, engineered in PSYOP labs to fuel precisely the type of rage needed to lure someone into pulling a trigger.

Robinson did not act alone. The ballistics on his firing position is complete gibberish, so he may not have even fired the fatal bullet. He was swarmed with a gaggle of online gore-porn psychos drooling to lure someone into their PSYOP trap and do something utterly insane, taking out one of their most hated public commentators in the process. This is Imams strapping explosives onto suicidal young men who have had every last vestige of hope crushed from their juvenile soul before they ever had a chance to even properly live life... but it's the American/Israeli version of that.

Welcome to the desert of the real...

 
Yeah, I'm feeling this, too. Like with everything else, I think we intuitively know we're not getting the full story. And it's easy to start to fill in the blanks, especially when we have preconceived notions.

I'm not ready to cross off the conspiracy possibilities, yet. But I'd like to see some evidence before jumping to conclusions. I'd also like to see more evidence to show me that's NOT the case.
Exactly.

God knows there are enough real conspiracies out there.

But I've seen this time and time again...conspiracies are like political opium, by creating them to explain away every single bad event, it allows a mental coping mechanism to take hold, to say, well, if we could just get this one guy that's behind all this, then this will stop.

Voting is the exact same coping mechanism, even though we both take part in it.

The reality is much worse, and the pathology of these people, that is Queer Race Communists, is manifold and all around us.

They label themselves "they" for a reason.

And he asked him, What is thy name? And he answered, saying, My name is Legion: for we are many. Mark Ch5 Vs9 KJV

 
You do not hate them enough.


G0_vIeKX0AAEptJ
 
Mises Caucus Chair Angela McArdle joins Aaron Harris and Nate Thurston to break down the past week's horrific events and discuss how the liberty movement must respond.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Has anyone here witnessed any of their coworkers praising Kirk's assassination? So far nobody at my workplace and said anything about it.
 
Never mind whether his repentance is big enough or soon enough. Even if it was too little too late (and, honestly, that call will be made above our pay grade), do we do the babies of Gaza more good by discrediting Kirk over his past support? Or do we do them more good winning his supporters over to the view that Israel robbed them of his presence in their lives because he saw this light and changed his mind?
I certainly don't judge him on where he was as a Christian. I was a fukin' mess at 31 and wasn't even calling myself Christian. Just a book nerd.

But he did say he wanted to be remembered for his faith. If he indeed was having a moment, and reaching out to people, switching sides...whatever BECAUSE of his faith, then I suppose this is worth knowing.

But for the purpose of "winning his supporters over to the view that Israel robbed them of his presence in their lives because he saw this light and changed his mind"....this is a pretty big list of "ifs" and even if it is proven, it makes him a martyr at best. I don't know that it is going to "honor his faith" in the sense of making people come to Christ.

His supporters seem to want to bathe in his blood in order to start a war with the left.

And I don't know that we can do the men, women, and children in Gaza any good by doing anything at this point. Giving them a voice if we can I think is worth it. Sadly, I don't see that Charlie went very far in that regard. Simply questioning Netanyahu giving a "stand down" order is actually a quite neutral position. Maybe to Israel it isn't, but to me, you're basically saying, "Well, Hamas and Palestine are evil incarnate, but maybe Israel wanted the war to happen?"

Anyway, like I said, the guy was young. Don't think there's much to this story other than the political football he's become in "the war on the left". While I don't think trying to finger Israel for this honors his faith, unless indirectly via more facts and investigation, I do think pointing out to his supporters that "a war on the left" isn't Christian does, and if he had real faith, he wouldn't support this retarded shit.
 
Yea and the text messages probably did happen as they were written

I'm just saying the text messages are a theatrical performance to provide cover for his queerdo lover
I read the whole text string and then someone mentioned this theory (i.e. "cover for the lover") and I agree.

It's the most simple explanation for the detailed narration. It looks very planned and rehearsed.

When I first read it, the thing that jumped out as ridiculous was the "please delete this". Who in 2025 who plays video games and watches TV would think these texts could simply be "deleted" for a guy wanted for killing a MAGA saint on live tv? Answer: no one. So "delete this exchange" is a smokescreen to make the reader believe that the writer is somehow ignorant of this fact.

Plus, the use of full and complete sentences with punctuation smells of a rehearsed transcription from a handwritten note, but maybe that's a stretch. This also explains his non-cooperation with police. If the text exchange is genuine then he obviously knows he already confessed. So why not cooperate with police? Well, if the text was rehearsed in order to protect the lover, he doesn't want to risk contradicting the roomates story when he is inevitably interrogated.
 
If they're losing Boomers, then they need to scrap their entire psyop division and start over.

 
Back
Top