Constitutional Paulicy
Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2011
- Messages
- 2,454
Why not gotta start somewhere. 

stupid...ron should be able to handle the media by now.
he's been in politics for over 20 years. he doesn't need handlers cancelling interviews or organizations lobbying against the media on his behalf.
this will only bring more bad press and will be otherwise inconsequential.
stupid...ron should be able to handle the media by now.
he's been in politics for over 20 years. he doesn't need handlers cancelling interviews or organizations lobbying against the media on his behalf.
this will only bring more bad press and will be otherwise inconsequential.
Words... "Republicans are scared and think he will go far, just like I think he will go far." ... words.
Dana Bash said:"I’m sure you talk to Republicans who are worried as well, just like I am, that Ron Paul will continue on long into the spring and summer."
Can we throw Gloria Borger into the deal also? She's just as bad as Dana Bash, and has one or two major conflicts of interest as a journalist.
I don't know what that means.
I am not seeing how Bash is the worst of the bunch. Not sure that singling her out is going to do any good, but who knows?
I am not seeing how Bash is the worst of the bunch. Not sure that singling her out is going to do any good, but who knows?
I wish we could get to the bottom of the Manchurian garbage. IPs, MAC addy etc...
I posted in the other thread this morning on Dana Bash and CNN HQ anchor Suzanne Spraytan and their bias nonsense in covering a Ron Paul piece. We know for a fact AGAIN, CNN edited their clip to give the wrong impression to the viewers about the media mob at Moe Joe's and Ron leaving.
Gluestick = Horse Glue aka Horse
I think the benefit is the fact that while saying, "the media has a blatant anti-paul bias" sounds like a conspiracy, this accusation is much more concrete and verifiable and makes more sense to the general public than speculation about corperate interests pulling strings behind the scenes.
because you make an example out of her.
Pathetic move on the part of RevPAC.
She clearly meant "Just like I am talking to Republicans who are worried."
Are you guys serious? If our opponents were to parse Ron Paul's words the same way, pretty much every single one of his statements could be taken out of context, due to his frequent use of the word "but" (which, if taken literally, means "but what I said just before this line doesn't apply").
Please retract this childish Dana Bash statement. I will not donate to RevPAC again until you do so.
Sincerely,
Sebastian Janssen
Los Angeles