REVPAC Calls for Removal of Dana Bash!

[V3n]

She's got an interesting wikipedia page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dana_Bash

Interesting ex-husband too:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Bash

 

[Deborah K]

Too bad about the first comment on the Revpac blog post -

Sean says:
January 10, 2012 at 12:42 pm
She looks like a horse.

UH, yeah! Try to leave the childish remarks to yourselves, people. You're the ones who create Ron Paul haters. Dumbasses.

 

[The Gold Standard]

Why would people complain about pointing out the media bias? It's not like the people are turned off by. They are voting for clowns like Romney and Huntsman and Santorum. The only reason to do that is that the television told you to do it.

 

[Tyler_Durden]

UH, yeah! Try to leave the childish remarks to yourselves, people. You're the ones who create Ron Paul haters. Dumbasses.

How about gluestick precursor? Seems innocent enough.

 

[braane]

UH, yeah! Try to leave the childish remarks to yourselves, people. You're the ones who create Ron Paul haters. Dumbasses.

People can't get it through their heads that what they say reflects on the campaign. Everywhere I turn Ron Paul supporters make childish and insulting remarks, they make the movement look bad. People need to grow up.

 

[Deborah K]

How about gluestick precursor? Seems innocent enough.

I don't know what that means.

 

[Tina]

Good! We need to stay on the media non stop for their manipulations.

 

[mikeforliberty]

Latest Tweet from Dana Bash: "Sign on the verizon arena in manchester says kelly clarkson is coming jan 24th. Think @ronpaul will come back to catch the concert?"

hxxps://twitter.com/#!/DanaBashCNN

 

[FreedomRings]

Wow, dumb move IMO. I thought it was pretty clear that she meant "Republicans are scared and think he will go far, just like I think he will go far."

Exactly. I thought she meant "I'm sure you talk to Republicans [...] just like I am". Even if she said that she was worried about RP, it can easily be spun in a different way that will make us look ridiculous. This is a terrible move. We need to choose our battles!

What's even worse is that John King caught the Ron Paul bug in Iowa and was relatively fair towards RP. These reporters are human beings! Even if they are controlled they have some leeway so we need to win them over, not attack them for something they didn't even do.

 

[BuddyRey]

Can we throw Gloria Borger into the deal also? She's just as bad as Dana Bash, and has one or two major conflicts of interest as a journalist.

 

[pauliticalfan]

All I'm saying is that if we're gonna go after individual reporters at CNN, I can think of about half a dozen that have done worse things than Dana Bash. Why not compile a list of all offenders from all networks and go after them all at once, which would actually accomplish something.

 

[pauliticalfan]

Can we throw Gloria Borger into the deal also? She's just as bad as Dana Bash, and has one or two major conflicts of interest as a journalist.

Exactly, there are so-called journalists who have done equally-offensive things. Borger, Erikkkson, Fleisher, etc.

 

[socal]

I don't know what that means.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_glue

 

[PastaRocket848]

because you make an example out of her.

 

[Tod]

I called.

 

[bt53]

I really think CNN should follow the FOX model. I mean, if you're going to hire God-awful reporters, they should at least look like Maxim models.

 

[ctiger2]

Former Federal Reserve Criminal Banking Cartel Alan Greenspan's wife is NOT biased!

 

[Diurdi]

Why..?

It's not like she is the worst.

 

[The Free Hornet]

Why clean up the media now? Just expose them. They'll just replace Ms Junk, with Ms Trash.

Yes and Ms Trash will think twice about discarding journalistic ethics to please her masters.

 

[teacherone]

stupid...ron should be able to handle the media by now.

he's been in politics for over 20 years. he doesn't need handlers cancelling interviews or organizations lobbying against the media on his behalf.

this will only bring more bad press and will be otherwise inconsequential.