Recount Results

[skgai]

Some results are up on New Hampshire's Secretary of State's webpage.

http://www.sos.nh.gov/recountresults.htm

Paul went from 2 votes to 6 votes in one Manchester Ward, but otherwise pretty accurate so far. Very little done as of yet, but if you're interested in the recount the raw numbers are here.

 

[torchbearer]

thank you!

 

[torchbearer]

Looks like he gained 7 votes in that one city. I bet you see that trend throughout. Especially on the zero vote precincts. I bet they were canning his votes.

 

[Bruce4Ron]

I noticed Clinton and Obama going up in every other Manchester Ward.

 

[torchbearer]

Look at:
Manchester Ward 6 - - - - 41 6

at the bottom of the page. what is Scatter? is that a person on the ballot? thats a big difference between recount.
Is that the total disparity or something for a ward?

 

[kirkblitz]

im retarded i cant seem to read that. Why are the numbers listed twice?

Manchester Ward 5 3

why isnt there anything after 3? 0 votes?

 

[RSLudlum]

looks like McCain is gaining votes also

 

[skgai]

You have a column with the person's name. That's the original vote total. The second column (green) is the recount total.

 

[torchbearer]

Look at:
Manchester Ward 6 - - - - 41 6

at the bottom of the page. what is Scatter? is that a person on the ballot? thats a big difference between recount.
Is that the total disparity or something for a ward?

What about the last column numbers for the above ward???? anyone else see something strange???

 

[matratzac]

damn by looking at this it looks like the original results were WAY off

 

[skgai]

I'm assuming Scatter are votes that are not yet recounted. It looks like this page maybe shouldn't have been put up yet. I'd wait for an update before I put faith in these numbers.

 

[CJLauderdale4]

Even if RP doesn't pick up much from a recount, doesn't a large amount of small count errors illustrate a large problem with counting ballots in out country??

 

[matratzac]

Even if RP doesn't pick up much from a recount, doesn't a large amount of small count errors illustrate a large problem with counting ballots in out country??

exactly, das what im saying, its like there are TONS of errors

 

[skgai]

whoops

 

[torchbearer]

I'm assuming Scatter are votes that are not yet recounted. It looks like this page maybe shouldn't have been put up yet. I'd wait for an update before I put faith in these numbers.

yeh, but scatter has two columns too. count and recount. 41 and 6. thats a big disparity. thats the things i'm looking for... like the 11 and 12 wards for Dr. Paul.
2 count, and 6 on recount
and
0 count, and 3 on recount

none of his numbers went down.

 

[skgai]

You've got me there. No idea what they could be. Let's wait for an update before we determine anything. This page is very fishy.

 

[azminuteman]

yeh, but scatter has two columns too. count and recount. 41 and 6. thats a big disparity. thats the things i'm looking for... like the 11 and 12 wards for Dr. Paul.
2 count, and 6 on recount
and
0 count, and 3 on recount

none of his numbers went down.

I'm all for fairness in voting but I'd like to chipin my 2 cents:

1) The fact that a recount even shows a single vote off form the official final tally it extremely troublesome. It's horrible accounting.
2) The 'no paper trail' electronic voting is extremely troublesome
3) If this recount shows, what, an additional 30 votes, then the $55,000 or whatever was practically wasted when it could have gone to a recount for a state that matters.

 

[mikeInAZ]

Thanks for the info. Man, that is one horrible display of data. But from what I'm seeing there are errors in most counties.

Now how does a "computer" make that many mistakes? These things need to be scrapped!

 

[AircooledVW]

These appear to be just the recounted ballots for Manchester though. So i wonder what the change could be state wide.

 

[mikeInAZ]

Can someone explain again how the machines in NH work? I know when they vote, there is a piece of paper, and that paper is saved. So, are they re-counting the paper ballots now by hand?

If so, it seems that could have a margin of error as well.