RECLAIM AUSTRALIA; Marchers across Australia against Islam

[DFF]

Diversity can divide or it can become a strength.

It can also destroy it like it did the Roman Empire or ancient Egypt.
There's a reason why the only states that have stood the test of time aren't diverse.
Because multiculturalism leads to only one thing in the long run: total ruin.

The Irish were going to ruin the US. The Italians were going to ruin the US. The Jews were going to ruin the US.

The Irish and Italians are more ethnically similar than Norwegians and Arabs. So they can coexist and work together in a far more efficient and productive manner.

 

[Zippyjuan]

Roman Empire was destroyed by over-extending itself. They tried to take over too many other people's countries. It became too expensive. Not because they were "too diverse".

 

[DFF]

Now, I'm not saying you can't have some diversity. But in order for a state to survive it needs to be at least 80% ethnically homogeneous.

 

[DFF]

Roman Empire was destroyed by over-extending itself. They tried to take over too many other people's countries. It became too expensive.

 

[Zippyjuan]

And actually, the Roman Empire was the longest lasting one in history. http://history.howstuffworks.com/historical-events/10-long-lived-empires.htm#page=10

 

[Wilf]

Now, I'm not saying you can't have some diversity. But in order for a state to survive it needs to be at least 80% ethnically homogeneous.

I do not think that the United States is.

 

[Zippyjuan]

I do not think that the United States is.

We are about average.

According to the theory, we should have imploded at least a century or more ago. How is Canada surviving? It depends on how you handle your diversity. Given the homogeneity of Europe- how come they have fought so many wars over there?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-most-and-least-ethnically-diverse-countries/

Article notes in its conclusion:

In general, it does not matter for our purposes whether ethnic differences reflect physical attributes of groups (skin color, facial features) or long-lasting social conventions (language, marriage within the group, cultural norms) or simple social definition (self-identification, identification by outsiders). When people persistently identify with a particular group, they form potential interest groups that can be manipulated by political leaders, who often choose to mobilize some coalition of ethnic groups (“us”) to the exclusion of others (“them”). Politicians also sometimes can mobilize support by singling out some groups for persecution, where hatred of the minority group is complementary to some policy the politician wishes to pursue.

 

[DFF]

That map is bullshit. Take Angola for example. Their "diversity" is multiple african tribes that are all 100% black!
Real racial diversity is subdivisions of White Europeans, non-White hispanics, blacks, arabs, and asians.
However, the most screwed up countries (with the exception of Canada) on the map are the most "diverse." They got this part right.

 

[Zippyjuan]

So "diversity" can only apply to skin color. Not religion or culture or other factors. Blacks in America are the exact same as the ones in Africa. They can't possibly assimilate. Ditto for Asians. They could never fit into American culture. A white Christian is the same as a white Muslim is the same as a white Jew. Are white Muslims welcomed?

Those tribes warring in Asia and Africa should be getting along great and not worry about their religious differences. Shiite, Suni, ISIS. All the same. Catholic/ Protestant disputes in Ireland? Can't happen. Jews and Arabs in the Middle East? All the same. No worries. Peace and stability. Does that extend to hair color too? I notice the video said some in Norway were starting to dye their hair black. Should they be forced to leave? They no longer look like everybody else. What about people who tan and darken their skins? Will they have troubles "fitting in"? Afterall- we only want what is best for them, right? If they can't fit in, they will be uncomfortable and should stay away or leave if already here. They will be much happier in their own country and not upset mine!

What would you say about Italians for example? Are they like the blonde, Nordic even though their skin is darker and their hair black? Or are they more Mediterranean and closer to Arab in race? Or are they European and thus "white"? Many from Mexico and South America are descendant from Spanish or Portuguese. Would they also be "white European" or is that a different race? Are the Spanish and Portuguese even White European?

 

[DFF]

So "diversity" can only apply to skin color. Not religion or culture or other factors.

Diversity is based off race and nothing else.

Blacks in America are the exact same as the ones in Africa.

No. Most blacks in America are 20% White.

 

[Zippyjuan]

So if somebody is white and follows the Koran- fine. Even if it is the same religion as those Muslim Arabs. If blacks are 20% white what percent white are Arabs? If 20% is fine as in Black Americans. Or are they not white enough and should leave? Since as you say, they are not the same as African blacks, they can't go there.

 

[Wilf]

So "diversity" can only apply to skin color. Not religion or culture or other factors. Blacks in America are the exact same as the ones in Africa. They can't possibly assimilate. Ditto for Asians. They could never fit into American culture.

Can't tell if you are serious or just sarcastic .

 

[Zippyjuan]

Just trying to find out what it is OK to mingle with. He said color of skin is the only thing which matters in diversity and too much diversity can ruin a country. Steve Jobs' ancestors came from Syria. He could not possibly be successful in America. Muslim Arabs are unacceptable. What about them makes that the case? If it is only skin color- they are actually not that different from most Americans.

http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Arab

These are the varied definitions commonly accepted in determining "Arab" status:

Islamic tradition: The Qur'an does not define who is an Arab, but there is a verse in the Qur'an stating "there is no difference between an Arab or Ajam (meaning a non-Arab speaker), only by their god-fearingness." The prophet Muhammad also noted that an Arab is anyone who speaks Arabic.

Ethnic identity: someone who considers him or herself to be an Arab (regardless of racial or ethnic origin) and is recognized as such by others.

Race: While the term "Arab" does not refer to a particular race, the majority of Arabs are categorized as Semites, though Arabs include Caucasians, Africans, and Middle Easterners, with ancestral origins in Europe, North Africa and the Middle East. The intermarriage of Arab seamen and their agents as far back as the first century [6] has left few 'pure' Arabs, racially. "Dark skinned" Arabs are Sudanese, Ethiopian and Somalian Arabs, and Arabs from Southern Egypt who are considered Africans. "Caucasian" Arabs are Arabs native to Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Tunisia, Algeria, and Libya among others, though they are considered by many as Middle-Easterners, or Semites.

Linguistic: someone whose first language is Arabic (including any of its varieties); this definition covers more than 250 million people. Arabic belongs to the Semitic family of languages.

Genealogical: someone who can trace his or her ancestry back to the original inhabitants of the Arabian Peninsula or the Syrian Desert.

 

[DFF]

Can't tell if you are serious or just sarcastic .

He's serious, the question is, does he believe his own bullshit?

 

[Wilf]

Just trying to find out what it is OK to mingle with. He said color of skin is the only thing which matters in diversity and too much diversity can ruin a country.

Depends.

 

[DFF]

He said color of skin is the only thing which matters in diversity and too much diversity can ruin a country.

Switzerland is considered the best country in the world and is largely ethnically homogeneous, comprised of Swiss German, French and Italians.
It's been around for over 700 years....can you name a single truly multicultural and successful state that's been around that long?
And please, spare me the Angola-is-diverse nonsensical argument. Show me an example of a successful state that's comprised of say Blacks, Native Americans, and Hispanics (or an alternative racial composition) that's been around for a millennium?
Can you come up with a single example? Betcha can't....

edit: watch this fool pull china out of his beehind. "It's been around for a thousand years, and composed of han chinese, hui chinese, manchu chinese...."

 

[Wilf]

Switzerland is considered the best country in the world and is largely ethnically homogeneous, comprised of Swiss German, French and Italians.
It's been around for over 700 years....can you name a single truly multicultural and successful state that's been around that long?
And please, spare me the Angola-is-diverse nonsense. Show me an example of a successful state that's comprised of say Blacks, Native Americans, and Hispanics (or an alternative racial composition) that's been around for a millennium?
Can you come up with a single example? Betcha can't....

Can you tell the difference between a Mexican and an Argentinian?

 

[DFF]

Can you tell the difference between a Mexican and an Argentinian?

Most Argentinians are either Italian or Spanish. Whereas most Mexicans are Spanish mixed with Indians.

They're madeup of different ethnic groups. Typically.

 

[Wilf]

Most Argentinians are either Italian mixed Spanish. Whereas most Mexicans are Spanish mixed with Indians.

So yeah, they're madeup of different dna. Typically.

Than you can figure out that diversity is based on enthnicties not race.

 

[DFF]

Italians and Spanish (from Spain) are both White ie, Caucasoid.
Indians however aren't white, they're a different racial group.
A country with Italians and Spanish is not diverse. A country with Italians and Indians is diverse.
Because it contains two different racial groups.
Not sure what you're trying to get at here. Other than an atypical SJW play on semantics.