Rand Paul: Trump is a "Chameleon"

Before June 16, Rand was the front-runner for the previous 3 years!

Just a fact check:

Rand dropped in the polls, sharply, a significant time before Trump announced. I'm not sure you consistently paid attention to the polls. Maybe only positive polls were posted here.
 
Just a fact check:

Rand dropped in the polls, sharply, a significant time before Trump announced. I'm not sure you consistently paid attention to the polls. Maybe only positive polls were posted here.

He dropped in the polls shortly after his PATRIOT Act filibuster? Source, please.
 
Last edited:
Exactly. He doesn't get it or refuses to. Trump sucks, but then why did you let him steal your voters? If Trump is as bad and phony as you say, then what does it say about you?? It's an indictment on the crap campaign he has run.
He's not stealing voters. He's the flavor of the month right now. People don't want him for president; they want him as the GOP/media gadfly.
 
Is Rand not fighting for his voter's now? Instead of fighting for Trump why don't you fight for Rand?

How can I fight for Rand when he made some questionable decisions and now is off message? This is his hole that he dug. I gave him money. Maybe I'll help the campaign locally but I am far from enthused. I am more infuriated because the opportunity was just laying there.
 
Somebody call LE, FSP-Rebel, Bastiat's The Law, etc......this Trump thing was just a conspiracy to see if y'all could get me to fight fiercely on behalf of Rand, wasn't it? Congratulations, I'm in. :)
 
You're wrong. There are cracks in the dam. People are started getting annoyed by Trump's childishness. I've seen it on the Blaze. It's time to bring him down. If Rand leads on this and shows Trump for what he is and presents his own message just right he can come away looking good.

You are missing the point too. It isn't about "bringing Trump down". Trump's supporters don't really care about Trump in the first place so you can't "bring him down". It is all about fashioning an appealing message. Rand had one in 2010. He had one the first few years of his Senate term. He doesn't have one now, neither do any of the other Republicans, and that is why Trump is getting so much support. They support Trump because they hate you. The only way to "bring Trump down" is to make them like you.
 


It looks like the campaign has decided that Trump has taken away the anti-establishment vote from Rand, and they want it back.

Projection.

Listen, there is 0% chance that Trump will win the general election so this won't matter anyway, but let's say he did... Do you think for one second he would follow the Constitution?! He would be Obama X 10.

Has Trump ever mentioned the Constitution? He would probably have less respect for limitations on government power than Chris "The Bill of Rights is null and void" Christie.
 
He can live in la la land after Donald Trump picked up the baton that he wanted no part of. So be it. Now Trump is atop the polls with that baton. A huge miscalculation I might add.

Trump will fall just has fast as he rose. Keep watching the show...the lights will be turned off soon...

Even low info voters will get tired of the bully on the playground with that baton who goes around saying, "you're ugly."
 
Trump will fall just has fast as he rose. Keep watching the show...the lights will be turned off soon...

Even low info voters will get tired of the bully on the playground with that baton who goes around saying, "you're ugly."

Heh. That was said 3 weeks ago and the train keeps slogging up the hill.
 
Donald Trump speaks up against the globalists, while Rand plays footsies with Silicon Valley and the Chamber of Commerce. The proof is in the pudding.

If Rand was posting on the forum right now, it's possible he would be more on the side of open borders and free immigration, as are multiple factions of libertarians, without pandering to the US Chamber.
 
If Rand was posting on the forum right now, it's possible he would be more on the side of open borders and free immigration, as are multiple factions of libertarians, without pandering to the US Chamber.

Even with the welfare state in place? Even Ron doesn't believe that. Open borders without a regulatory state in place is far more feasible than open borders in Extortion USA. You don't defeat Extortion USA by adding more dependents.
 
How can I fight for Rand when he made some questionable decisions and now is off message? This is his hole that he dug. I gave him money. Maybe I'll help the campaign locally but I am far from enthused. I am more infuriated because the opportunity was just laying there.

What questionable decisions? To kill the PATRIOT Act? To try to defund Planned Parenthood? Or just to refuse to become a Trump Yes-Man like you?

How is he off message? He talked about the economy, the Constitution, and the corruption. He talked about borrowing money from China and giving it to nations that hate us. Are you just saying he's off message because you want him to kiss Trump's ass as much as you do?

What opportunity is just lying there? The opportunity to convince some three quarters of the nation that you can't be trusted with the presidency? The opportunity to lose flamboyantly, but in any case, lose?

Even with the welfare state in place?

See, now, I remember when you were smitten with Cruz and Rubio. Rand Paul gave them the chance to take a huge bite out of the welfare state just a short time back, and give the money to the Military Industrial Complex, and they wouldn't do it. They were too set on driving up the debt. So, we ask again, why are you harping on Rand Paul? Isn't that kind of like blaming the fact that the house is flooded on the plumber because the plumber didn't succeed in talking you into fixing the screwed up floor drain?
 
Last edited:
How can I fight for Rand when he made some questionable decisions and now is off message? This is his hole that he dug. I gave him money. Maybe I'll help the campaign locally but I am far from enthused. I am more infuriated because the opportunity was just laying there.

By pulling your head out of your ass and seeing that Rand is the best chance we have.

Paul’s father, Ron—a three-time presidential candidate once as a Libertarian Party member and twice as a GOP member—said Rand Paul is the candidate Republicans should pick as their nominee for president because he’s the only one who understands the issues most important to the nation.

“His philosophy is close to my philosophy,” Ron Paul told Breitbart News of Rand Paul. “It’s for less government, for liberty, and nobody else even has the vaguest understanding if you compare what his understanding is for free markets and Austrian economics. Nobody else even comes close.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...was-fantastic-helped-wake-up-american-people/

Quit shilling for Trump and annoying the hell out of everyone on here and fight for Rand.
 
Even with the welfare state in place? Even Ron doesn't believe that. Open borders without a regulatory state in place is far more feasible than open borders in Extortion USA. You don't defeat Extortion USA by adding more dependents.

You would have to ask Rand over a beer to get his personal opinion. But there's a couple of regular posters that would be more than happy to debate on the open borders side of the issue... ;)
 
That won't help his sagging poll numbers. Only Rand can do that.

Can't you see that he already did during the debate, or we'd already be hearing about how he torpedoed himself? Are you really so allergic to principle that this horse race rhetoric can completely dominate you? Even to the point that you're ready to let the United States of America go down in flames just to satisfy your pique? Even though the damned horses haven't even reached the quarter mile post yet, and no one who was in the lead at this stage has ever won the race ever?

You going to address any of these points, or just filibuster right on by them?
 
Last edited:
You would have to ask Rand over a beer to get his personal opinion. But there's a couple of regular posters that would be more than happy to debate on the open borders side of the issue... ;)

The country is broke, so we do not need to borrow money from China to give to Saudi Arabia. You can easily segue the very same concern to illegal immigration. The country is hopelessly broke, so we do not need to load up our service & security net with foreigners. Our prime concern is domestic citizens. This is simple economics. Jesus Christ. You don't have to be a bombastic Donald Trump to be resolute on the issue.
 
Back
Top