Rand Paul to Skip RNC Convention

[LibertyEagle]

Agent Orange rots the brain.

Is it really necessary to be insulting?

 

[juleswin]

Is it really necessary to be insulting?

Stated differently, "Is it necessary to be politically incorrect?"

 

[LibertyEagle]

You would think that the more words these people type, the less they'd be able to convince themselves of the con they're buying. But no. That does not appear to be the case. They will do anything they can in their minds to convince themselves that Trump benefits liberty somehow. Amazing.

Trump is a really a master at playing to the fantasies of some people. Even if they catch on that it's a con, they STILL think he'll benefit them in some way.

"these people"? Do you mean forum members who, given Rand has dropped out of the race, plan on voting for Trump? Those people?

Tell me, are you saying the same thing to Johnson/Weld supporters on this site? If not, why not?

 

[nikcers]

He didn't need an invitation to attend.

That doesn't mean he was invited to speak. He can't just take the mic wearing a conservative lives matter shirt and talk about anything he wants. Even if they did agree to let him speak they would probably provide him with the speech, or make him submit it for approval in advance.

 

[LibertyEagle]

Stated differently, "Is it necessary to be politically incorrect?"

I think you mean the opposite.. politically-correct and no it isn't. However, insinuating other forum members have rotted brains isn't about being politically-correct, or even arguing a point of substance. It's about being rude. Here would be another example.... The people who tend to make such posts tend to be people who lack the mental acuity to formulate a coherent post, so they sink to simpleminded insults.

 

[LibertyEagle]

That doesn't mean he was invited to speak. He can't just take the mic wearing a conservative lives matter shirt and talk about anything he wants. Even if they did agree to let him speak they would probably provide him with the speech, or make him submit it for approval in advance.

Do you mean like he had to do when he spoke at Romney's coronation?

 

[nikcers]

Do you mean like he had to do when he spoke at Romney's coronation?

Was he up for re-election?

 

[The Rebel Poet]

I think you mean the opposite.. politically-correct and no it isn't. However, insinuating other forum members have rotted brains isn't about being politically-correct, or even arguing a point of substance. It's about being rude. Here would be another example.... The people who tend to make such posts tend to be people who lack the mental acuity to formulate a coherent post, so they sink to simpleminded insults.

This is very ironic coming from you. You constantly are rude to members who dare to question Trump. You call us cucks, and say we hate white people, and that we are "foaming at the mouth," and are full of hate, and call us secret Hillary supporters. You recently said every post I make is weak. Was that "necessary"? Was that arguing a point of substance? Maybe when you worry about the plank in your eye someone will take you seriously. How can you trump supporters be so sensitive, yet so rude?

 

[LibertyEagle]

This is very ironic coming from you. You constantly are rude to members who dare to question Trump. You call us cucks,

I have NEVER called anyone a cuck on here. NEVER. I do not even know what it means.

and say we hate white people,

Huh? Who is "we"?

and that we are "foaming at the mouth," and are full of hate,

The only time I recall ever saying, "foaming at the mouth" was way back before Bryan bought the forum and when a little gang was running around here beating anyone who dared to say they might vote for Trump, up side the head.

and call us secret Hillary supporters.

The only "us" I recall are those who either said they had supported Hillary in a post, or another who voted for Hillary in a public poll. So, pretty good guess, no?

You recently said every post I make is weak.

That would infer that every post you make is to insult someone. Is that what you are saying you do?

Was that "necessary"? Was that arguing a point of substance?

Yes, I think it was necessary. Because at least it possibly made you pause and think about what you have been doing.

Maybe when you worry about the plank in your eye someone will take you seriously. How can you trump supporters be so sensitive, yet so rude?

I think you have selective vision. It's been pretty a pretty non-stop insult fest against members here who dare to admit they are voting for Trump. The funny thing is, that well over 90 percent of the threads started about Trump have been by a self-proclaimed Trump-hater. And I would venture to say that the same percentage of less than negative posts about Trump have been to correct a lie posted here about one of his positions. So, to say you guys are causing the vast majority of the Trump drama, not to mention Trump posts in general, around here is an understatement.

 

[ChristianAnarchist]

You missed it, there are like 20 posts now deleted from this thread, about 10 were mine. CPUd took issue with my educational campaign post and broke guidelines. Regardless I thought wrote a well meaning lengthy reply about the state of public opinion and why Rand lost to Trump, what he could have done different and why I believed he then ran an educational campaign. Of course she continued, I then broke guidelines which pissed the clique off, now it is all gone, lol.

No doubt the same people that can't handle a discussion demanded 20+ posts get deleted. Typical day on RPF with supposed lovers of liberty demanding mod censorship.

Don't think anyone "demanded" it. Stop thinking you are important enough for someone to take the time to bother the mods... You need more -rep...

 

[The Rebel Poet]

That would infer that every post you make is to insult someone. Is that what you are saying you do?

Considering that neg rep was on my post in the linguistics thread, that implies it was either a retaliatory neg rep, or you thought my post about proto-world language was made just to insult someone. Stop deflecting.

 

[kahless]

Stop thinking you are important enough for someone to take the time to bother the mods... You need more -rep...

I know this for a fact. This censorship crap due to "complaints" from certain people has been going on for awhile so shut your pie hole rather than post about something you know nothing about.

CPUd also boasted about the last time she reported me where I got banned in this very thread. The post was above yours before it got deleted.

Posted this yesterday in site suggestions which describes why.

....They insult and mock other members driving them eventually to the point of getting out of line back. They wait for that so they then can report it to the mods which is of course all the mods see without the time to research the mountain of prior poor behavior on their part (which is understandable).

They also will then come in to categories like this and make suggestions about forum members behavior and banning this or that to provide cover.

If you want to know why posting here is light and a failure to bring in new members these days you can attribute to those tactics. Not to forget to mention the continuing derailing of threads. It is the oldest tricks in the book to destroy forums and back in the day Usenet groups.

That has been CPUd's pattern of behavior for the last year. The difference between me and the offenders is I never report anyone since I believe in free speech.

 

[William Tell]

I don't know if this has been answered before, but was Rand Paul invited?

No, he was not invited to speak. He has no reason to go.

 

[kahless]

I can confirm some of this to.

You constantly are rude to members

Every time I see your handle, I think oh the rude guy. Talk about pot calling the kettle black.

You call us cucks

You display the cuck mentality with other forum members. I do not believe I have ever replied to any of your posts but any disagreement I have with anyone else you are in my neg rep panel. In fact you took the time to neg rep me the "Site suggestion" post that I quoted in the post above yesterday.

and say we hate white people, and that we are "foaming at the mouth," and are full of hate, and call us secret Hillary supporters.

You completely disallow any form of discussion on Conservatism or Trump and respond with your vile hate. I had not even mentioned Trump in my last few threads yet you neg rep me with Trump insults. I would say the many neg reps I have received from you constitute being "full of hate" and "foaming at the mouth".

You recently said every post I make is weak. Was that "necessary"? Was that arguing a point of substance? Maybe when you worry about the plank in your eye someone will take you seriously. How can you trump supporters be so sensitive, yet so rude?

The first thing I think of when I see your handle and this has been for awhile now that your entire purpose of posting on these forums is to insult people. I am not just talking about the reps I am talking about your posting history.

 

[nikcers]

No, he was not invited to speak. He has no reason to go.

Oh so he isn't even a delegate then? I thought he was a delegate for some reason, must be a different Kentuckian i'm thinking of.. I was just thinking how funny it would be if Trumps delegates don't even show up. I mean we paid people to show up basically because no one has 5 grand extra to drop on a trip to Cleveland especially if they don't support Trump.

 

[The Rebel Poet]

You completely disallow any form of discussion on Conservatism or Trump and respond with your vile hate. I had not even mentioned Trump in my last few threads yet you neg rep me with Trump insults. I would say the many neg reps I have received from you constitute being "full of hate" and "foaming at the mouth".

Sorry that my having an opinion disallows you from discussing Trump. Are the plus reps I've given you (including one just yesterday) also full of hate?

 

[AuH20]

A Trump victory will release Liberty from the grinding shackles of statism, and finally America will join the chorus of Freedom ringing from sea to shining sea.

It will be glorious.

A Trump victory will send the globalists scurrying back into their dark crevices like cockroaches. The unitary executive model was specifically designed for a loyal globalist to utilize as opposed to a former casino grifter with nationalistic tendencies. They might even try to accelerate their plans in desperation.

 

[William Tell]

Oh so he isn't even a delegate then? I thought he was a delegate for some reason, must be a different Kentuckian i'm thinking of.. I was just thinking how funny it would be if Trumps delegates don't even show up. I mean we paid people to show up basically because no one has 5 grand extra to drop on a trip to Cleveland especially if they don't support Trump.

He is a delegate, a lot of office holders are made delegates by the party. Like any other delegate, that doesn't mean he gets a speaking slot.

 

[ChaosControl]

I dont blame him. Unless he was going to make a play for the nomination in the case the delegates are unbound I see no reason to go. Yeah a speech can be helpful but I am not sure it would really build his profile when it is given during the nomination of a toxic candidate like Trump.

 

[LibertyEagle]

Considering that neg rep was on my post in the linguistics thread, that implies it was either a retaliatory neg rep, or you thought my post about proto-world language was made just to insult someone. Stop deflecting.

Not deflecting at all. Merely answering your rude as all hell post accusing me of calling you names that I never did. Yet, instead of apologizing, you deflect with this. Sad, really.