Rand just said he was never against the Civil Rights Act with respect to race but was against the broader applications with regards to smoking and calories on menus? WTF? I know what Rand is trying to say. The broad interpretation of the commerce clause, which the Civil Rights Act is based on, applies to all federal mandates on private business. But the Civil Rights Act itself has never been applied to smoking. Come on Rand. Your audience is smarter than that. That's a bad soundbite. But not a total loss.
Rand just did a good job on a question about impeachment. Now he's being asked about the EPA and free markets. He's using the "You can't polute on your neighbor's property" argument and spoke positively about the clean water act, but pointing out how it's gone to far by calling "dirt" a pollutant and "your back yard" a navigable stream.