Rand Paul leading in NH... Paul 17, Christie 16... Cruz in 6th place

As the Washington Post recently tweeted (paraphrasing): "even among Republicans, polls show the more people get to know Cruz, the less they like him."
 
Cruz might scare 'moderate' voters into supporting Rand, I think Cruz's rise to prominence is helping Rand by making him look less extreme in comparison.
 
No One But Paul!

I will make it extremely clear that I won't be voting for Christie, Rubio, Cruz, Ryan, Bush or any other Republican candidates. The GOP has one chance to earn my vote and that is Rand Paul. Lety's hope they don't go with a Romney type mistake again. I think the pain of losing to Obama twice should help them realize that we won't be falling in line and voting for any candidate simply because he is not the Democrat nominee.
 
How is "net electability" measured? Rand Paul is winning, but they don't explain it.
 
Please create your own or share this 1.



RonPaulFanInGA said:
As the Washington Post recently tweeted (paraphrasing): "even among Republicans, polls show the more people get to know Cruz, the less they like him."
Click to expand...
He has the highest will not vote for percentage.

AlexAmore said:
How is "net electability" measured? Rand Paul is winning, but they don't explain it.
Click to expand...
Not sure. It looks like he has a really high favorable number compared to some of them.
 
Last edited:
RonPaulFanInGA said:
As the Washington Post recently tweeted (paraphrasing): "even among Republicans, polls show the more people get to know Cruz, the less they like him."
Click to expand...


I'm looking for that silly RPF poster that kept repeating how Cruz is going to 'change the narrative', LMAO!

I forgot his name though.
 
Cleaner44 said:
No One But Paul!

I will make it extremely clear that I won't be voting for Christie, Rubio, Cruz, Ryan, Bush or any other Republican candidates. The GOP has one chance to earn my vote and that is Rand Paul. Lety's hope they don't go with a Romney type mistake again. I think the pain of losing to Obama twice should help them realize that we won't be falling in line and voting for any candidate simply because he is not the Democrat nominee.
Click to expand...

Headline on Drudge today: "McCain considering running again". Oh god. Then I saw they're just talking about his Senate seat. Hopefully he doesn't even get to keep that; he barely scraped by against some unknown last-time IIRC.
 
Cleaner44 said:
No One But Paul!

I will make it extremely clear that I won't be voting for Christie, Rubio, Cruz, Ryan, Bush or any other Republican candidates. The GOP has one chance to earn my vote and that is Rand Paul. Lety's hope they don't go with a Romney type mistake again. I think the pain of losing to Obama twice should help them realize that we won't be falling in line and voting for any candidate simply because he is not the Democrat nominee.
Click to expand...

Sounds like you are making the assumption that most Republicans think they lost to Obama because their nominee didn't have support from the liberty movement. Most Republicans think they lost because they lost the youth vote & minority vote.
 
Uriah said:
Sounds like you are making the assumption that most Republicans think they lost to Obama because their nominee didn't have support from the liberty movement. Most Republicans think they lost because they lost the youth vote & minority vote.
Click to expand...

I was actually lectured by a mainstream Republican (at a county GOP committee meeting) about how Ron Paul's lack of an endorsement of Romney lost the GOP the election. Then she apologized at a event less than a month later.
 
Uriah said:
Sounds like you are making the assumption that most Republicans think they lost to Obama because their nominee didn't have support from the liberty movement. Most Republicans think they lost because they lost the youth vote & minority vote.
Click to expand...
A liberty candidate will bring in the youth vote and minority vote though. At least more so than say... Christie.
 
Pertinent statistics are on page 21. Interesting stuff. Good favorabilities on most demographics. Does really well with Tea Party, and very low unfavorability with 20-34.
 
but Cruz owns the Obamacare issue, and as it implodes Cruz will benefit.

also, Cruz has to be viewed as a potential VP for Rand (Rubio and Christie are not) the VP must be Hispanic, and that leaves Cruz, Labrador, and Martinez.
 
cindy25 said:
but Cruz owns the Obamacare issue, and as it implodes Cruz will benefit.

also, Cruz has to be viewed as a potential VP for Rand (Rubio and Christie are not) the VP must be Hispanic, and that leaves Cruz, Labrador, and Martinez.
Click to expand...

Cruz is not eligible, he was born in Canada and is a Canadian citizen....he's not a natural born citizen.
 
eleganz said:
I was actually lectured by a mainstream Republican (at a county GOP committee meeting) about how Ron Paul's lack of an endorsement of Romney lost the GOP the election. Then she apologized at a event less than a month later.
Click to expand...

Interesting.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

osan
Brunson v. Adams: Read This Most Interesting Case
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
jbnevin
jbnevin
CPUd
WMUR NH 7/22-7/30 Trump-24; Bush-12; Walker-11; Paul/Christie-7
Replies
8
Views
698
rich34
R
M
CNN/ORC: Rand 6th Bush 7th nationally
2 3
Replies
51
Views
4K
grizzums
grizzums
K
CNN national poll... Much better, Rand in 6th
2 3
Replies
59
Views
4K
Paul4Prez
P
carlton
Paul tied for 6th in Virginia, nipping at Cruz's heels
Replies
17
Views
1K
jkob
J
Back
Top