Darguth
Member
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2012
- Messages
- 714
It doesn't seem like there's any point of Rand voting to confirm Brennan if he's going to all of this trouble to filibuster his nomination. If he's going to all of this effort to filibuster the nomination, he might as well vote against final confirmation as well. That would be the consistent position.
You're clearly misunderstanding why he's filibustering. It's not necessarily to deny final confirmation. It's to force the Administration to reveal and define policies so that we can have an open debate on them. This is exactly what he did with Hagel. There is no lack of consistency.
Last edited: