There were members of the original Ron Paul 2008 movement that were a complete liability and ended up costing us a lot of support with fence-sitters, and I recall BenMuldowney leaning in that direction in terms of his viewpoints. I knew that when a certain number of them went totally ballistic over Rand endorsing Romney in 2012 (the election was over by that point, I was on the ground here in Pennsylvania as a poll worker, we did not have the delegates to keep Romney from getting the nomination even with all the states where we did win) that there was a severe lack of rationality and practicality in said contingent, and this sort of craziness and fanaticism is exactly where Trump's occasional crumbs of conventional libertarianism are focused, peeling off people too angry to think straight.
As someone who is myself more of a nationalist and am not really any type of egalitarian (more a paleo-con than a libertarian), I am nevertheless unable to sympathize with people on the Trump train. Opposing the Iraq War on one end and then yammering about using nukes against ISIS and taking Libya's oil on the other end leaves the rank smell of bullshit in my nostrils, and it's the same with this "build a wall, but have a nice big open door in the middle" crap, as if we're being overrun by barbarian Mongolians and need a barrier, yet plan on simply blowing a few billion dollars to make their point of entry more picturesque.
Oh, and in interests of full disclosure, I just bombarded Ben with as much negative rep as I could muster. Coming on this forum and doing this "Rand has .00001% chance of winning" shtick is the same as endorsing Trump. You're on the wrong forum pal, take this crap over to Breitbart.