Project NHRECOUNT - Bump for Liberty

[Publius Freeman]

Here's what I suggest we do at this point, in order of priority:

1. Stop letting this issue divide us. That's what the enemy wants. This is a grassroots effort up to us and the people of NH. No threats to the RP campaign.

2. Chipin to fund ~$65K recount now - http://www.grannywarriors.com

3. Work with Obama supporters to fund their half (and see who can get there first)

4. Continue sending email to NH DOJ and SOS to hold off certification of election. Add alleged fraud videos if necessary, and collect more news screen shots, etc.

5. Identify pro bono attorneys from RP Revolution that will assist in the effort.

6. Focus on handcounting ballots in machine municipalities first, then the others.

(7) Once funded, RP or Obama needs to request NH recount, by law. I actually think this act would do nothing but add campaign credo to whoever is bold enough to step forward, if it's done in the right way (that is making sure that state/federal elections for public office in U.S. are fair and transparent, not in a selfish, sour grapes sense. This is really the essence of the campaign, afterall, because all is lost without fair elections). Hunter and Kucinich could also boost their candidacy in this manner...

For upcoming elections, these actions and websites are important:

1. http://www.watchthevote2008.org for RP pollwatchers with tally sheets (exit polls) and Voter Verification Affadavits for each voter (doesn't matter who they voted for, give them out to everyone). Real-time reporting back from polls.

2. https://secure.eff.org/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=109
http://www.blackboxvoting.org
+ any other sites I may have left out for e-voting reform

3. Ongoing lawsuits demanding verifiable paper balloting

Freedom only comes with personal responsibility. Nobody else is going to make it happen for us. It won't be easy. Tyranny is not an option.

For Liberty,
Publius Freeman

Ron Paul, and the American people, will win in 2008.

 

[Publius Freeman]

$2,576 so far...

http://grannywarrior.chipin.com/recount-

 

[Publius Freeman]

RP Revolution Attorney Staff Pro Bono Candidates

From campaign website, Attorney endorsements

http://www.ronpaul2008.com/endorsements#lawyers

Probono for Liberty - RP Revolution Attorney Staff candidates:

Lawyers & Legal
Thomas J. Adair, Jr., Attorney, Slidell, Louisiana
Abelardo J. Arias, Attorney; Hamden, Connecticut
Stephan P. Babik, Attorney, Cleveland, Ohio
Milton E. Barker, Jr., Attorney, Birmingham, Alabama; City Attorney/Prosecutor, Adamsville/Clay, Alabama; Prosecuter, Hueytown, Alabama; Judge, Morris/Warrior, Alabama
Robert W. Bright, Attorney; Canton, Ohio
Phillip Day, JD, MBA, LL.M, CPA, CFP, Principle, Law Offices of Phillip Day, P.L
Matthew D. Dubin, Attorney, Law Offices of Matthew D. Dubin, Seattle, Washington
Ralph Fucetola, Vitamin Lawyer.com Consultancy; Newton, New Jersey
Brandy L. Gonzales, Attorney, Law Office of Brandy L. Gonzales, L.L.C, Mandeville, Louisiana
Karl Hanson, Patent Attorney, Medina, Minnesota
Steve Heath, Attorney, Dallas, TX; Republican Activist
Mark A. Herber, Attorney, Herber & Nash PC, Longmont, Colorado
Christopher I. Kachouroff, Trial Lawyer
Christopher Kalabus, Attorney, Law Offices of Goldberg and Osborne, Tucson, Arizona
T.J. Lane, Lawyer, McKinney, Texas
Raymond B. Mitchell, Attorney, Law Firm of Raymond Mitchell, Cape Coral, Florida
Mike Morelano, Magistrate / JP
Robert M. Owens, Managing Partner, Owens Law Office LPA
Michael P. Pexa, Attorney, Franke & Riach P.A., Shoreview, Minnesota
Gerald A. Spala, Attorney, Law Offices of Gerald A. Spala, Riverside, California
William R. Sparks, Attorney, Canton, Ohio; President, American Realty Title Assurance Co.; Member, Stark County, Ohio Republican Executive Committee
Jeff Turner, Attorney, Law Office of Jeff Turner, Dallas, Texas
Mark A. Ziebold, Esq., LLM in Taxation, CWPP, CAPP, Law Office of Bradley N. Etter, APC, Tustin, CA

 

[Spideynw]

Please do not waste time or resources on this issue. It will not help Ron Paul and may instead hurt him. Donate to Ron Paul instead or help pay for local newspaper adds if you are already maxed out.

 

[irrelevantnotch]

hmmm

 

[Publius Freeman]

If you're not a part of the solution, you're a part of the problem...

This fund is above and beyond the call of duty toward the campaign.

 

[fight_for_liberty]

Go Away.

+42

We do not need negativity and people telling us where to focus our efforts. We have plenty of people to both introduce people to Paul and to make sure the institution KNOWS that we will not let FRAUD go on.

 

[RP=RonPaul=RedPill]

bump

 

[AndyWhite]

If there is a recount and it does indeed prove there was vote fraud thereby placing Ron Paul in 3rd or 4th this would be an international news story. The risk in a recount is that some people might view Ron Paul as a sore loser, but the reward is unprecedented coverage of vote fraud and Ron Paul is the victim. If there is vote fraud and it is proven it will help Ron Paul more than anything I could imagine. The more the risk the bigger the reward. I for one have donated multiple times to the campaign and I demand a recount. Maybe its better that the grassroots initiates it as opposed to the campaign.

 

[Publius Freeman]

Bump.

Ron Paul is A victim, America is THE victim.

 

[Bilgefisher]

I will not argue with what you are doing, but shouldn't we concentrate on Michigan first. Seems this would take a long time to pursue and Michigan is in 5 days.

 

[Publius Freeman]

I don't believe NH Secretary of State has certified NH Primary Election yet.

 

[Publius Freeman]

Looking for a good Obama forum website to post a fundraising challenge in...

 

[fight_for_liberty]

I agree, Bilgefisher . But the two things are not mutually exclusive.

People in Michigan, or around Michigan, really need get out there any get out the vote.

But what about our 20,000 voters in New Hampshire? They can handle this voting stuff.

A *great* guide to campaigning effectively:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=gr3yEvGOAi8

 

[Publius Freeman]

If you go to politico.com and look at the map of NH you will find by adding up all of the percentages that 2.4% of the vote did not go to any of the candidates listed:

http://www.politico.com/nhprimaries/nhmap-popup.html

This made me wonder - what happened to that 2.4%? Did 1 in 50 people really drive all the way to the polling station just to vote for an "other".

So I checked out the new hampshire state tallies which includes the others. Here is a link to the page I used:

http://www.sos.nh.gov/presprim2008/index.htm

Adding up all of the "others" including Keyes I came to a total of 529 votes state wide (not including Belknap county which does not have the votes listed for some reason).

Now 529 votes does NOT add up to 2.4%. Fred Thompson got about 1.2% of the vote and he got 2884 votes. If you double that number you will be roughly at 2.4% with 5768 votes. Subtract the 529 votes that really did go to others you are have...

5239 votes that have not been accounted for

Just for fun by adding all of those votes to Ron Paul it would put him in 4th place with 3000 more votes that Rudy.

If I've made any mistakes please correct my work. I demand to know to whom these votes went.

MORE INFO:

The Dems apparently had 1.61% go to "other" in NH. I can only assume many of those votes have not been attributed to anybody either.

Bump.

 

[Publius Freeman]

For Immediate release - NCEL - All 50 states are being sued to prevent the use of computerized voting systems during the 2008 primary and general elections and beyond. The lawsuit seeks to halt the use of machine-based voting systems and vote counting procedures that hide the ballots and the counting of votes from the People.

The NCEL complaint challenges the constitutionality of current voting procedures in the states, claiming that they "heighten the possibility of confusion, deception, frustration, and fraud." It contends that the existing practices are constitutionally deficient and prevent open, verifiable, transparent voting, and that the use of discredited electronic voting machines and flawed vote counting procedures drastically increase the likelihood of error and election fraud. The lawsuit calls for a visible chain of ballot custody with paper ballots kept in full public view throughout the voting, counting, and tallying process. The lawsuit asks the Court to prohibit the states from conducting elections that are not open, verifiable, transparent and machine and computer free.

The US Supreme Court has declared the meaning of the Right to vote, as guaranteed by the US Constitution. Individuals not only have the Right to cast a vote, they have the Right to cast an effective vote, meaning they have the Right to have their vote counted correctly. "We need to bring transparency and accountability to the voting process throughout the states," said Bob Schulz, who wrote the brief and is spearheading the nationwide effort. "We need to reclaim our vote and ensure that our voices are heard and that our votes are accurately counted. The only sure way to do that is to have the People, in the light of day, observe, verify, and secure the votes cast on paper ballots and to count those ballots before the public by hand."

Since at least 1988, the ballots in 49 states and half of New Hampshire are hidden from the people and counted in secret by computers. This procedure violates two Supreme Court rulings. NCEL was filed in all 50 states to remedy this freedom threatening problem.

Read the National Clean Elections Lawsuit . NCEL was filed to restore hand-marked, hand counted paper ballots that never leave the sight or custody of the people until the ballots are counted and the results posted in each neighborhood polling place. This means machine-free, computer-free counts in our elections once again.

http://ncel.w4sp.com/

http://www.WETHEPEOPLEFOUNDATION.org - Bob Schulz

http://www.VOTEFRAUD.org: - Jim Condit Jr.

http://www.ronpaulforpresident2008.com/news/

Thanks.

 

[Publius Freeman]

Please look here.

"Hand Count Shows 15% For Ron Paul"
http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=749

Now please tell me why the machine votes were so much lower.

Also keep in mind that they found 31 people that didn't get counted in sutton. So yes clearly even the hand counting could have been frauded a little. That is why we need at least one meetup group member or at least 1-2 ron paul voters or supporters to stand out of each precint during the voting to see who voted for ron. My meetup group is already arranging this. We're going to work in shifts and make fast food runs, etc. At least 1-2 people will always be present outside of the polling area. So we need to get these lawsuits going to get rid of these horrible machines. At the same time we will be monitoring the precints like hawks.

They were lower because they were programmed to be lower IMHO...stolen, in other words.

 

[Publius Freeman]

Just watch it!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qV6qAGigGYY&eurl

Then you understand, that all another issues are meaningless in this situation right now.

Expose the fraud, and then you have a chance!

If it looks like a duck...

 

[Publius Freeman]

-New Hampshire LHS executive is a convicted felon
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=84314

-Map of Ron Paul precinct results
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=84256

-Citizens for Legitimate Government, "Where Paper Prevailed, Different Results"
http://www.legitgov.org/nh_machine_vs_paper.html

-New, Improved Analysis of NH Democratic Primary Results By Voting Method.
http://www.democraticunderground.co...sg&forum=132&topic_id=4009174&mesg_id=4009174

-Confirmed Vote Fraud in NH , Retired FBI Agent Files RICO lawsuits
http://www.arguewitheveryone.com/po...b-i-ageny-files-rico-lawsuits.html#post286319

Ron Paul - Now The Boston Globe Changed Their Story
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Zu0Oaw9tIPM

-Statistical Anomaly (25%), New Hampshire Style
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=83600

-Youtube: Is this Fraud? (Boston Globe, 01/09/2008)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qV6qAGigGYY

-Obama and Paul poll workers kicked out of some precincts
http://www.boston.com/news/local/politics/primarysource/2008/01/obama_and_paul.html

-99 ways to steal elections: The story of John Fund and Ron Paul
http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_melinda__080109_99_ways_to_steal_ele.htm

-"Other" did quite well yesterday...
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=84047

-New Hampshire Polling Fiasco (ABC)
http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenumbers/2008/01/new-hampshires.html

-Diebold Voting Machines statistical bias in NH
http://ronrox.com/paulstats.php

-CNN exit poll stacked
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=84014

-NH Primary Results (source: Nashua Telegraph) *(1)
http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?category=news0807

-NH Primary Results (source: AP) *(2)
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/county/#val=NHREP9

*Compare and Contrast Greenville for (1) and (2)

-New Hampshire Primaries - Ron Paul Forums
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=253

-Mount Vernon Fraud Exposed
http://ronpaulforum.com/showpost.php?p=317012&postcount=5

-Ron Paul Votes Not Counted In NH District
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/january2008/010908_not_counted.htm

-New Hampshire District Admits Ron Paul Votes Not Counted
http://prisonplanet.com/articles/january2008/010908_district_admits.htm

-NH Primary: Pre-Election Polls Wildly Different Than Results Announced for Clinton/Obama
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2008/090108Polls.htm

-Black Box Voting
http://blackboxvoting.org

-Vote Watch
http://votewatch.w4sp.com/

-Liberty Broadcast Network
http://libertybroadcastnetwork.org/

-Donate Funds for Grassroots Recount
http://grannywarrior.chipin.com/recount

Call Bev Harris, source for Voting Fraud
Sutton reported 0 votes for Ron Paul, all the way until late last night. State Sticking to their guns. Family said WTF, then Sutton county retracted and said Ron Paul got 31 votes, not zero. Vote fraud expert Bev Harris contacted the head clerk in Sutton, Jennifer Call, who was forced to admit that the 31 votes Ron Paul received were completely omitted from the final report sheet, claiming "human error" was responsible for the mistake.

-WE CAN DO THIS RECOUNT THING OURSELVES
http://operationwakethesefuckingidiotsup.blogspot.com/

The town of Manchester reported 570 votes for "other". Who the hell is "other"? 570 votes for the Easter Bunny?
-AJ radio network, 01/09/2008

http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=760#more-760

Youtube: Rigged USA Elections Exposed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEzY2tnwExs

Wow. Who is this "other"?
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=253&order=desc&page=2

New Hampshire Townships with more then 50 votes for “OTHER”
By IG | January 9, 2008

http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=760#more-760

Barrington - 1,530 votes

VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro

- Giuliani = 149 votes = 9.74%
- Huckabee = 208 votes = 13.59%
- Hunter = 11 votes = 0.72%
- McCain = 576 votes = 37.65%
- Paul = 130 votes = 8.50%
- Romney = 363 votes = 23.73%
- Thompson = 28 votes = 1.83%
- Other = 65 votes = 4.25%

—————————————

Bedford - 6,048 votes

VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro


- Giuliani = 579 votes = 9.57%
- Huckabee = 434 votes = 7.18%
- Hunter = 16 votes = 0.26%
- McCain = 2148 votes = 35.52%
- Paul = 263 votes = 4.35%
- Romney = 2479 votes = 40.99%
- Thompson = 51 votes = 0.84%
- Other = 78 votes = 1.29%

————————————–

Belmont - 1,261 votes

VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro

- Giuliani = 96 votes = 7.61%
- Huckabee = 180 votes = 14.27%
- Hunter = 11 votes = 0.87%
- McCain = 456 votes = 36.16%
- Paul = 102 votes = 8.09%
- Romney = 329 votes = 26.09%
- Thompson = 30 votes = 2.38%
- Other = 57 votes = 4.52%

———————————–

Claremont - 1,631 votes

VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots

- Giuliani = 113 votes = 6.93%
- Huckabee = 309 votes = 18.95%
- Hunter = 7 votes = 0.43%
- McCain = 593 votes = 36.36%
- Paul = 120 votes = 7.36%
- Romney = 398 votes = 24.40%
- Thompson = 22 votes = 1.35%
- Other = 69 votes = 4.23%

——————————–

Concord - 6,439 votes

VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro

- Giuliani = 565 votes = 8.77%
- Huckabee = 781 votes = 12.13%
- Hunter = 24 votes = 0.37%
- McCain = 2684 votes = 41.68%
- Paul = 601 votes = 9.33%
- Romney = 1577 votes = 24.49%
- Thompson = 49 votes = 0.76%
- Other = 158 votes = 2.45%

——————————

Dover - 4,268 votes

VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro

- Giuliani = 388 votes = 9.09%
- Huckabee = 458 votes = 10.73%
- Hunter = 16 votes = 0.37%
- McCain = 1779 votes = 41.68%
- Paul = 369 votes = 8.65%
- Romney = 1102 votes = 25.82%
- Thompson = 59 votes = 1.38%
- Other = 97 votes = 2.27%

——————————-

Gilford - 1,922 votes

VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro

- Giuliani = 139 votes = 7.23%
- Huckabee = 139 votes = 7.23%
- Hunter = 8 votes = 0.42%
- McCain = 740 votes = 38.50%
- Paul = 78 votes = 4.06%
- Romney = 735 votes = 38.24%
- Thompson = 21 votes = 1.09%
- Other = 62 votes = 3.23%

——————————-

Goffstown - 3,561 votes

VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro

- Giuliani = 308 votes = 8.65%
- Huckabee = 417 votes = 11.71%
- Hunter = 19 votes = 0.53%
- McCain = 1212 votes = 34.04%
- Paul = 260 votes = 7.30%
- Romney = 1258 votes = 35.33%
- Thompson = 30 votes = 0.84%
- Other = 57 votes = 1.60%

——————————-

Hooksett - 2,862 votes

VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro

- Giuliani = 309 votes = 10.80%
- Huckabee = 295 votes = 10.31%
- Hunter = 14 votes = 0.49%
- McCain = 994 votes = 34.73%
- Paul = 169 votes = 5.90%
- Romney = 991 votes = 34.63%
- Thompson = 29 votes = 1.01%
- Other = 61 votes = 2.13%

——————————

Hopkinton - 1,491 votes

VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro

- Giuliani = 103 votes = 6.91%
- Huckabee = 140 votes = 9.39%
- Hunter = 10 votes = 0.67%
- McCain = 616 votes = 41.31%
- Paul = 80 votes = 5.37%
- Romney = 365 votes = 24.48%
- Thompson = 17 votes = 1.14%
- Other = 160 votes = 10.73%

——————————–

Hudson - 4,160 votes

VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro

- Giuliani = 326 votes = 7.84%
- Huckabee = 454 votes = 10.91%
- Hunter = 21 votes = 0.50%
- McCain = 1395 votes = 33.53%
- Paul = 307 votes = 7.38%
- Romney = 1518 votes = 36.49%
- Thompson = 57 votes = 1.37%
- Other = 82 votes = 1.97%

———————————-

Keene - 2,807 votes

VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro

- Giuliani = 218 votes = 7.77%
- Huckabee = 374 votes = 13.32%
- Hunter = 19 votes = 0.68%
- McCain = 1089 votes = 38.80%
- Paul = 204 votes = 7.27%
- Romney = 738 votes = 26.29%
- Thompson = 48 votes = 1.71%
- Other = 117 votes = 4.17%

————————————

Lebanon - 1,681 votes

VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro

- Giuliani = 122 votes = 7.26%
- Huckabee = 212 votes = 12.61%
- Hunter = 6 votes = 0.36%
- McCain = 726 votes = 43.19%
- Paul = 137 votes = 8.15%
- Romney = 391 votes = 23.26%
- Thompson = 34 votes = 2.02%
- Other = 53 votes = 3.15%

———————————–

Lisbon - 340 votes

VOTE COUNT METHOD: Hand Counted Paper Ballots

- Giuliani = 28 votes = 8.24%
- Huckabee = 59 votes = 17.35%
- Hunter = 1 votes = 0.29%
- McCain = 106 votes = 31.18%
- Paul = 19 votes = 5.59%
- Romney = 47 votes = 13.82%
- Thompson = 3 votes = 0.88%
- Other = 77 votes = 22.65%

————————————

Londonderry - 5,685 votes

VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro

- Giuliani = 418 votes = 7.35%
- Huckabee = 544 votes = 9.57%
- Hunter = 19 votes = 0.33%
- McCain = 1757 votes = 30.91%
- Paul = 288 votes = 5.07%
- Romney = 1989 votes = 34.99%
- Thompson = 52 votes = 0.91%
- Other = 618 votes = 10.87% (WTF???)

————————————–

Manchester - 15,067 votes

VOTE COUNT METHOD:

- Giuliani = 1454 votes = 9.65%
- Huckabee = 1640 votes = 10.88%
- Hunter = 94 votes = 0.62%
- McCain = 5119 votes = 33.97%
- Paul = 1230 votes = 8.16%
- Romney = 4935 votes = 32.75%
- Thompson = 139 votes = 0.92%
- Other = 456 votes = 3.03%

—————————————

Merrimack - 5,806 votes

VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro

- Giuliani = 524 votes = 9.03%
- Huckabee = 561 votes = 9.66%
- Hunter = 41 votes = 0.71%
- McCain = 2046 votes = 35.24%
- Paul = 385 votes = 6.63%
- Romney = 2075 votes = 35.74%
- Thompson = 71 votes = 1.22%
- Other = 103 votes = 1.77%

—————————————

Nashua - 12,195 votes

VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro

- Giuliani = 992 votes = 8.13%
- Huckabee = 1120 votes = 9.18%
- Hunter = 62 votes = 0.51%
- McCain = 4294 votes = 35.21%
- Paul = 979 votes = 8.03%
- Romney = 4447 votes = 36.47%
- Thompson = 128 votes = 1.05%
- Other = 173 votes = 1.42%

—————————————-

Plaistow - 1,516 votes

VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro

- Giuliani = 124 votes = 8.18%
- Huckabee = 97 votes = 6.40%
- Hunter = 4 votes = 0.26%
- McCain = 482 votes = 31.79%
- Paul = 99 votes = 6.53%
- Romney = 641 votes = 42.28%
- Thompson = 15 votes = 0.99%
- Other = 54 votes = 3.56%

—————————————

Portsmouth - 2,827 votes

VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro

- Giuliani = 325 votes = 11.50%
- Huckabee = 196 votes = 6.93%
- Hunter = 10 votes = 0.35%
- McCain = 1219 votes = 43.12%
- Paul = 221 votes = 7.82%
- Romney = 728 votes = 25.75%
- Thompson = 26 votes = 0.92%
- Other = 102 votes = 3.61%

—————————————-

Raymond - 1,829 votes

VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro

- Giuliani = 160 votes = 8.75%
- Huckabee = 241 votes = 13.18%
- Hunter = 10 votes = 0.55%
- McCain = 618 votes = 33.79%
- Paul = 165 votes = 9.02%
- Romney = 527 votes = 28.81%
- Thompson = 18 votes = 0.98%
- Other = 90 votes = 4.92%

————————————–

Rochester - 4,339 votes

VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro

- Giuliani = 379 votes = 8.73%
- Huckabee = 712 votes = 16.41%
- Hunter = 31 votes = 0.71%
- McCain = 1498 votes = 34.52%
- Paul = 348 votes = 8.02%
- Romney = 1123 votes = 25.88%
- Thompson = 87 votes = 2.01%
- Other = 161 votes = 3.71%

————————————-

Salem - 5,020 votes

VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro

- Giuliani = 416 votes = 8.29%
- Huckabee = 402 votes = 8.01%
- Hunter = 17 votes = 0.34%
- McCain = 1566 votes = 31.20%
- Paul = 270 votes = 5.38%
- Romney = 2245 votes = 44.72%
- Thompson = 34 votes = 0.68%
- Other = 70 votes = 1.39%

————————————-

Swanzey - 1,062 votes

VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro

- Giuliani = 88 votes = 8.29%
- Huckabee = 145 votes = 13.65%
- Hunter = 7 votes = 0.66%
- McCain = 413 votes = 38.89%
- Paul = 69 votes = 6.50%
- Romney = 248 votes = 23.35%
- Thompson = 17 votes = 1.60%
- Other = 75 votes = 7.06%

————————————-

Windham - 3,367 votes

VOTE COUNT METHOD: Diebold Accuvote optical scan ; contractor: LHS Associates/John Silvestro

- Giuliani = 266 votes = 7.90%
- Huckabee = 233 votes = 6.92%
- Hunter = 8 votes = 0.24%
- McCain = 1065 votes = 31.63%
- Paul = 148 votes = 4.40%
- Romney = 1514 votes = 44.97%
- Thompson = 28 votes = 0.83%
- Other = 105 votes = 3.12%

Good roundup. Londonderry looks especially suspect...

 

[Electric Church]

I'm gonna wait a bit to hear from two sources: Head Quarters and general Alex Jones. If he decides that the money must be raised at grassroots level it will probably be raised in about 24 hours.

Alex, I'm sure, is in communiqué with HQ and they'll come to a decision I'm sure. Meanwhile I'm gonna hold tight.