Ender
Member
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2007
- Messages
- 12,527
Are you implying President of the US and editors of NYT/WaPo have same level of access/information regarding US secret agencies operations?
Nope.
I'm STATING that all sides make up shit.
Are you implying President of the US and editors of NYT/WaPo have same level of access/information regarding US secret agencies operations?
I think Breitbart has the most level of access/information at this point since they are on the NSCAre you implying President of the US and editors of NYT/WaPo have same level of access/information regarding US secret agencies operations?
If they treated Trump the same way they treated Ron Paul, we'd have Rand Paul as president now.
Nope.
I'm STATING that all sides make up $#@!.
Talk about the kettle calling pot black. 90% of the sh*t that comes out of his mouth is fake news and then you go to his favorite internet newsite infowhores and 99% of the sh*t is fake news too. My problem is not that the MSM he mentioned are not fake news but the fact that he has no credibility to point fingers when he and the media he likes(infowhores, fox news) are just as fake as the CNNs of this world.
Your argument fails. Your comparing White European Native settlers to modern day hordes who are a lot more worse.
Sign of somebody uncertain they are good enough and insecure about themselves. Afraid somebody will figure out they are a fraud.
Plus they have not hit Trump
How did he skip over MSNBC, FOX, and the Washington (Com)Post?
So Obama tapped numerous foreign governments, wire tapped journalists, but you don't think he would tap people in the Trump administration and Trump campaign?
And somebody tapped Flynn's phone calls. You think that was just a four hundred pound hacker tapping a secure russian diplomatic line?
Give me a break.
While it is true that media neocons played a major role in pushing propaganda in support of Iraq war, Libya Benghazi, Syria bloodbaths etc and public has lost faith in fake news media.. but is the President right here?