President: Fake news media (NYT, NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN) is the enemy of the American People

[Athan]

We should only have government controlled media like those outstanding Liberty promoting countries like China, Russia, and North Korea. Then they won't say bad things about our Great Leader. It disrupts our unity. Then we will know the Real Truth. No more lies.

(and get rid of judges too- too many checks and balances get in the way of the government doing whatever it wants to)

lol, no one is saying get rid of average journalist you cuck. Mods do need to get rid of your account.

 

[jmdrake]

1:16 Ah yes that i am aware of it. True that hasn't happened yet. Are you telling me your pro migrant?

What the? Okay. Do you have an ounce of decency in your body? Here's what happened. Juleswin called out Brietbart for reporting ridiculously fake news. You asked him why. He gave you evidence of their fakery that happens to be anti immigrant fakery. You admit it's fake, then ask him if he's pro migrant? Seriously? How about being pro truth? Hey "angry Canadian" your ancestors migrated! The indigenous Americans can at least claim they migrated before there were any other people here, but everyone else? Migrant. I'm not pro migrant or anti migrant. I'm pro liberty and pro truth. Anything or anyone that distorts the truth undermines liberty. If there are people going around burning churches that shouldn't be covered up. But if there are not people running around burning churches that should not be made up!

Seriously, you sound like some Al Sharpton clown who's response to someone pointing out that the Tawana Brawley story was fake is "What? Are you pro cop?"

 

[AngryCanadian]

What the? Okay. Do you have an ounce of decency in your body? Here's what happened. Juleswin called out Brietbart for reporting ridiculously fake news. You asked him why. He gave you evidence of their fakery that happens to be anti immigrant fakery. You admit it's fake, then ask him if he's pro migrant? Seriously? How about being pro truth? Hey "angry Canadian" your ancestors migrated! The indigenous Americans can at least claim they migrated before there were any other people here, but everyone else? Migrant. I'm not pro migrant or anti migrant. I'm pro liberty and pro truth. Anything or anyone that distorts the truth undermines liberty. If there are people going around burning churches that shouldn't be covered up. But if there are not people running around burning churches that should not be made up!

Seriously, you sound like some Al Sharpton clown who's response to someone pointing out that the Tawana Brawley story was fake is "What? Are you pro cop?"

I'm pro liberty and pro truth.

Does pro liberty include liberty for Sharia law? because thats what the migrants in Europe want.

 

[jmdrake]

Yea, but most normal people already consider National Inquirer fake news that sometimes reports real news. I think most MSM and even some alt media like Breitbart and infowhores are fake news agencies that just like the National Inquirer report some real news. And if you the process of calling out fake news, you omit the fake news agencies because they support you, then you are no better than the people you are calling out.

I mentioned the National Inquirer because some nitwits here are RPF who shall remain unnamed treated the fake story about Ted Cruz having multiple affairs as if it came straight from heaven.

 

[jmdrake]

Does pro liberty include liberty for Sharia law? because thats what the migrants in Europe want.

Some of the migrants want. And you are a migrant or at least a descendant of one. Also quit trying to change the subject like a coward. Brietbart posted a disgustingly fake news story that wasn't even remotely true. If Brietbart wants to post polls about how migrants feel about Sharia law then they should post polls about how migrants feel about Sharia law and not resort to exaggeration and lies.

 

[AngryCanadian]

What the? Okay. Do you have an ounce of decency in your body? Here's what happened. Juleswin called out Brietbart for reporting ridiculously fake news. You asked him why. He gave you evidence of their fakery that happens to be anti immigrant fakery. You admit it's fake, then ask him if he's pro migrant? Seriously? How about being pro truth? Hey "angry Canadian" your ancestors migrated! The indigenous Americans can at least claim they migrated before there were any other people here, but everyone else? Migrant. I'm not pro migrant or anti migrant. I'm pro liberty and pro truth. Anything or anyone that distorts the truth undermines liberty. If there are people going around burning churches that shouldn't be covered up. But if there are not people running around burning churches that should not be made up!

Seriously, you sound like some Al Sharpton clown who's response to someone pointing out that the Tawana Brawley story was fake is "What? Are you pro cop?"

Hey "angry Canadian" your ancestors migrated!

However our ancestors werent bunch of uncivilized Animals or Rapists that had gone down on a sexual emergency as a excuse.

You asked him why. He gave you evidence of their fakery that happens to be anti immigrant fakery. You admit it's fake, then ask him if he's pro migrant? Seriously? How about being pro truth?

I will start caring or giving crap about being pro truth once the news media does the same when it comes to the migration crisis which they have being lying and deceiving.

 

[jmdrake]

However our ancestors werent bunch of uncivilized Animals or Rapists that had gone down on a sexual emergency as a excuse.

History begs to differ.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2497199.stm

The Canadian Government has agreed a deal with the Anglican Church of Canada, to share the costs of thousands of law suits brought by native Canadians who were abused in residential schools during the 20th Century.

The government will pay 70% of the costs, leaving the Anglican Church to find up to $16m.

The government owns the schools but they were run by four Christian churches.

It is the first such deal between the government and the church.

But it doesn't satisfy many of the native Canadians making claims.

Dark times

The affair is a dark period in the country's history that continues to be felt today.

From the 1930s until the mid-1990s, tens of thousands of native Canadians children were sent to residential schools in Canada.

They were supposed to learn the ways of the European settlers.

Pope John Paul II during his visit to Canada
The Catholic church faces more than two thirds of the claims
But many suffered physical and sexual abuse at the hands of their teachers.

Most native communities are blighted by social problems, that many people there now argue result from the suffering caused by the schools.

Around 12,000 people have filed law suits, but only 500 have been settled, as arguments continue over who should pay the compensation.

Moving on

Last year, the government announced it would meet 70% of the costs, but at the time the churches said that wasn't enough.

The Anglicans are the first to agree.

Meeting the claims on their own would have bankrupted them.

The government minister who arranged the deal, Ralph Goodale, says it means money can be focussed on helping those who suffered.

"Any progress in putting aside that argument about percentages as between the government and the churches will certainly be of benefit to aboriginal claimants and victims," he says.

Catholic cases unresolved

But it will still be a long time before all the cases are settled.

The Anglican church has only around 20% of all the claims.

The Catholic church faces more than two thirds of them, and it has no agreement with the government.

Nor have many native people in Canada.

In order to get access to the compensation, they must agree to drop all legal action.

And many are now fighting for compensation for being deprived of their language and culture.

The government says it will continue to fight those cases in court.

 

[AngryCanadian]

Some of the migrants want. And you are a migrant or at least a descendant of one. Also quit trying to change the subject like a coward. Brietbart posted a disgustingly fake news story that wasn't even remotely true. If Brietbart wants to post polls about how migrants feel about Sharia law then they should post polls about how migrants feel about Sharia law and not resort to exaggeration and lies.

wow this forum has lost its minds. Are you aware what Sharia law is? Sharia law forbids women rights. In Sharia law there is no liberty or freedom.

I am not sure who has lost more of their minds the libaerls wanting Sharia law and more Muslims or pro liberty types saying how great Sharia law is?

 

[jmdrake]

wow this forum has lost its minds. Are you aware what Sharia law is? Sharia law forbids women rights. In Sharia law there is no liberty or freedom.

Are you aware that your ancestors routinely raped native American children? Did you participate?

Edit: And yes dweeb. I know what Sharia law is. It's basically a rip off of Mosaic law. And no, not all migrants to Europe want Sharia law. Not all of the migrants are even Muslim. (Oh, you didn't know that there are Christians who lived in Syria for centuries and are now on the run?) Goodness, pull your head out of your arse.

 

[AngryCanadian]

History begs to differ.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2497199.stm

The Canadian Government has agreed a deal with the Anglican Church of Canada, to share the costs of thousands of law suits brought by native Canadians who were abused in residential schools during the 20th Century.

The government will pay 70% of the costs, leaving the Anglican Church to find up to $16m.

The government owns the schools but they were run by four Christian churches.

It is the first such deal between the government and the church.

But it doesn't satisfy many of the native Canadians making claims.

Dark times

The affair is a dark period in the country's history that continues to be felt today.

From the 1930s until the mid-1990s, tens of thousands of native Canadians children were sent to residential schools in Canada.

They were supposed to learn the ways of the European settlers.

Pope John Paul II during his visit to Canada
The Catholic church faces more than two thirds of the claims
But many suffered physical and sexual abuse at the hands of their teachers.

Most native communities are blighted by social problems, that many people there now argue result from the suffering caused by the schools.

Around 12,000 people have filed law suits, but only 500 have been settled, as arguments continue over who should pay the compensation.

Moving on

Last year, the government announced it would meet 70% of the costs, but at the time the churches said that wasn't enough.

The Anglicans are the first to agree.

Meeting the claims on their own would have bankrupted them.

The government minister who arranged the deal, Ralph Goodale, says it means money can be focussed on helping those who suffered.

"Any progress in putting aside that argument about percentages as between the government and the churches will certainly be of benefit to aboriginal claimants and victims," he says.

Catholic cases unresolved

But it will still be a long time before all the cases are settled.

The Anglican church has only around 20% of all the claims.

The Catholic church faces more than two thirds of them, and it has no agreement with the government.

Nor have many native people in Canada.

In order to get access to the compensation, they must agree to drop all legal action.

And many are now fighting for compensation for being deprived of their language and culture.

The government says it will continue to fight those cases in court.

Your argument fails. Your comparing White European Native settlers to modern day hordes who are a lot more worse.

 

[AngryCanadian]

Have fun eating up George Soros BS. "We are all Muslims" right?

 

[jmdrake]

Your argument fails. Your comparing White European Native settlers to modern day hordes who are a lot more worse.

You don't even have an argument for it to fail moron.

 

[AngryCanadian]

You don't even have an argument for it to fail moron.

I already know where the discussion is going to end at. And you want to compare the European settlers as ruthless and savages. While you will be still defending the new Muslim/African migrant comers.


How typical.

 

[jmdrake]

I already know where the discussion is going to end at. And you want to compare the European settlers as ruthless and savages. While you will be still defending the new Muslim/African migrant comers.


How typical.

Uh no. That's not where the discussion is going. That's where it went in your dishonest mind. I pointed out the fact to you that not all of the migrants are even Muslim. But that is too much for your little mind to comprehend. You started your silly rant because someone else pointed out that Brietbart posted a bullshyt story. Since you can't defend that you decided to change the subject. The subject is fake news. Fears over migrants, however justified those fears may be, do not excuse just making shyt up and passing it off as news.

 

[nobody's_hero]

Even after Trump leaves, the media will still be full of shit.

Doesn't take a rocket surgeon to find out who the bigger threat is.

 

[juleswin]

1:16 Ah yes that i am aware of it. True that hasn't happened yet. Are you telling me your pro migrant?

I migrated to the US myself so I am pro migration, but I have a feeling what you are trying to ask is if I am pro refugee migration and I don't have an easy answer for you. The reason is because when one goes on a humanitarian war rampage destroying lives and property and causing instability, the victims of this war should be compensated in some way for the damages they sustained and sometime the compensation comes in the form of accepting them in as refugees.

But also, I am not in favor of migrants of any flavor behaving badly. I think anyone migrant or not who commits real crimes should be punished and lastly I really do not appreciate it when alt media who while rightly accuses MSM for punishing fake news, makes stories up or exaggerates incidents involving refugees.

 

[Working Poor]

I can't forget how the fake news treated Ron Paul.

 

[Gumba of Liberty]

I can't forget how the fake news treated Ron Paul.

Nor I. It's incredible how the NeverTrumper's, who were screaming bloody murder before the election about how Trump would be worse than (or as bad as) Hillary, are now trying to save face by condemning Trump for outing the corporate-globalist propaganda outlets. The only argument they have is:

Well, Trump lies too!

Ignore the facts, ignore the mans actions, personally attack anyone with an open mind, and keep moving forward with the narrative. I mean at this point to admit failure would take a degree of self-shaming and (mental) teenagers are not good at such self-reflection. Poor babies.

 

[enhanced_deficit]

Even after Trump leaves, the media will still be full of $#@!.

Doesn't take a rocket surgeon to find out who the bigger threat is.

I can't forget how the fake news treated Ron Paul.

Good points.
MSMedia is full of deceptions.

He forgot to add FOX News

Fox is often neoconish and hedges its bets nicely in a bi-partisan way:

Fox owner hosted fund raiser for Hillary Clinton, his daughter hosted fund raiser for Obama

 

[enhanced_deficit]

We should only have government controlled media like those outstanding Liberty promoting countries like China, Russia, and North Korea. Then they won't say bad things about our Great Leader. It disrupts our unity. Then we will know the Real Truth. No more lies.

(and get rid of judges too- too many checks and balances get in the way of the government doing whatever it wants to)

To be fair, criticism of corrupt, dishonest, MIC interests pimping corporate media doesn't equate to a call for "government controlled media".
I'm sure you'll agree with that