pcosmar
Member
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2007
- Messages
- 54,940
Been here since May 2007. One of the old guys.
Nice to see you check in. +Rep (owe ya a couple)
Been here since May 2007. One of the old guys.
Larry your presence is requested in the Iowa subforum, specifically the thread about setting up grassroots busing.Been here since May 2007. One of the old guys.
2008? Hell, I was a Ron Paul supporter when he ran in 1988! That was the first POTUS election I was eligible to vote in.
I voted for Harry Browne in '92, but afterwards became so fed up with both electoral politics & the LP that I haven't voted since.
After 9/11, I became so disgusted with the rampant warmongering, welfarism, & myriad other manifestations of anti-liberty bullshit that I tuned out completely. I deliberately ignored politics, stopped watching the news altogether, etc.
I was so far out of the loop that I didn't even know Ron Paul had run in 2008 until after it was over. I found out when someone at work mention Rand Paul's senate run in 2010. I went to the 'net to find out more & discovered what I had missed out on in 2007-2008. I've been kicking myself ever since.
Thanks! Ron Paul, his message & the inroads they've gained make it worthwhile to jump back into the circus.Don't kick yourself. There is so much more ahead of us! Welcome back![]()
Okay, I've got something to admit: I supported Mittens in the primaries. There...I said it.
My girlfriend, a huge Ron Paul supporter along with her family, and I began dating just after the primaries. She and her father went to work on me and I converted before the general. I began lurking around here in early fall '08 and finally joined late last year.
Indeed! The RP cult is growing! He's catching on, I tell ya!So awesome to hear stories like these! Welcome!
Last time we were polling at 1% nationally for months, even though the internet was exploding. Most people are not internet political junkies and only catch their news in passing. They don't look that deeply into things. Whoever is in the media at that particular time gets filed away subjectively. When someone polls them about candidates, they picture those select few "media candidates" and choose from that. For right or wrong, being on tv gives a person a certainly level of legitimacy to the general public. Ron Paul has made tremendous inroads on this, he's a frequent guest on news programs now and had several best selling books, and now his son is the star of the Tea Party movement. He's polling at 10% now and hasn't even officially started his campaign yet, nor has the general public gotten into Presidential Election campaign mode yet. This is outstanding news!
969 members came on since yesterday and we have only 182 votes in the poll right now, so....
plus you have to register to vote.
altogether 9079 people have been on since yesterday, and a couple of days ago it was 11,000+ in one day.
Well, I'm starting to regret even posting that in this thread - but I still think my point is valid. (Even though everyone disagrees with me.)
There is not enough "new" support since 2008. This poll shows it. You can say it's unscientific or whatever, and yes, there is a huge margin for error - but still I think this poll (even with margin of error) is more telling than many will care to admit.
Original 2008 support for Ron Paul is great and clearly necessary - but if the "new" support option does not reach 50%-67% come next January - then I don't think Ron Paul will come close to winning Iowa or NH.
Okay, I've got something to admit: I supported Mittens in the primaries. There...I said it.
My girlfriend, a huge Ron Paul supporter along with her family, and I began dating just after the primaries. She and her father went to work on me and I converted before the general. I began lurking around here in early fall '08 and finally joined late last year.