Poll: Judge Roy Moore leads competitors in runoff

Some talking head broad on Fox just called him a pedophile. She should look up the definition. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Some talking head broad on Fox just called him a pedophile. She should look up the definition. :rolleyes:

Hannity, while discussing the Moore situation, went on a tangent about how much he despises "child molesters". As if it applies to these accusations. How old was the latest accuser? 28?

Seeing as how accusations of sexual harassment have already been thrown at Hannity, and it is the go to tactic to remove right wing media people, it's ironic how he has jumped on the bandwagon. Suppose his "white knight" weakness is being used against him, and he is now a useful idiot for the left.
 
Hannity, while discussing the Moore situation, went on a tangent about how much he despises "child molesters". As if it applies to these accusations. How old was the latest accuser? 28?

Seeing as how accusations of sexual harassment have already been thrown at Hannity, and it is the go to tactic to remove right wing media people, it's ironic how he has jumped on the bandwagon. Suppose his "white knight" weakness is being used against him, and he is now a useful idiot for the left.

Money is the only explanation needed, his sponsors were leaving unless he turned against Moore so he caved, hopefully his audience will abandon him and his sponsors.
 
Hannity, while discussing the Moore situation, went on a tangent about how much he despises "child molesters". As if it applies to these accusations. How old was the latest accuser? 28?

Seeing as how accusations of sexual harassment have already been thrown at Hannity, and it is the go to tactic to remove right wing media people, it's ironic how he has jumped on the bandwagon. Suppose his "white knight" weakness is being used against him, and he is now a useful idiot for the left.

According to WAPO there were 4 accusers. 3 of which said that after they denied consent he took them home. They were all over the legal age of consent at the time. 16 or older.
Only one accuser was under that age. 14. She said he called her at home and on "her" phone set up a date. She accuses the date lead to getting down to underwear and him heavy petting her. She alleges that when he guided her hand to his dick, she expressed that she wanted to be taken home. He did. Her mother has since stated that her daughter didn't have a private phone. There was only a "house" phone.
The latest to come forward, Allreds presser, has been called out regarding the yearbook signature. I think she was 17 at the time.

As far as Hannity he is an opportunist and he saw money dwindling away. So he blew which way the wind did.
 
Gloria Allred on CNN: Asked about Roy Moore serving as a judge in Nelson's divorce, Allred dodges the question: "This is not a senate hearing, last time I checked, and we're not going to put everything out there until there is a senate hearing."

Additionally said not submitting the yearbook for verification until senate hearings..... WHICH MEANS IT WASN'T VERIFIED IN THE FIRST PLACE! By god these idiots, how do you not verify the signature before going public and the press conference. I'll tell you why....these are EVIL people.

 
Last edited:
He should have just followed the pilot formula.

Take you age, devide by two and add seven.
 
Gloria Allred on CNN: Asked about Roy Moore serving as a judge in Nelson's divorce, Allred dodges the question: "This is not a senate hearing, last time I checked, and we're not going to put everything out there until there is a senate hearing."

Additionally said not submitting the yearbook for verification until senate hearings..... WHICH MEANS IT WASN'T VERIFIED IN THE FIRST PLACE! By god these idiots, how do you not verify the signature before going public and the press conference. I'll tell you why....these are EVIL people.

Of course not. It would be long after the election for a civil trial. A Senate hearing isn't gonna happen unless Rand calls for it, and even then it won't happen before the election. The RNC wants Doug Jones to win.
 
Please do tell us how do you properly deny ridiculous accusations? Is there a playbook?:cool:

When a friendly Hannity asks you:
“Do you remember dating girls that young at that time?”

The correct answer is “No. It never happened”.

NOT:

“Not generally, no. If did, you know, I'm not going to dispute anything but I don't remember anything like that.”

At best, this guy is a doofus and whatever Rand saw in him isn’t going to happen. Rand doles out endorsements way too easily.
 
When a friendly Hannity asks you:
“Do you remember dating girls that young at that time?”

The correct answer is “No. It never happened”.

NOT:

“Not generally, no. If did, you know, I'm not going to dispute anything but I don't remember anything like that.”

At best, this guy is a doofus and whatever Rand saw in him isn’t going to happen. Rand doles out endorsements way too easily.

Dating girls that age is not a crime and therefore he doesn't have to deny it absolutely, on the other hand since he did date young girls if he denies these specific claims it is possible one of them lied about her age and then he can be accused of lying, it sounds just like the kind of careful response lawyers are trained to make in situations like this.
 
Steve Bannon loves Roy Moore. Trump supports Moore whether he says so publicly or not, which means if Rand is smart he will support Moore too.

That simple fact that folks like Mitch McConnell hate Roy Moore and are threatening to expel him should he win, demonstrates how much they fear a Moore victory.
 
When a friendly Hannity asks you:
“Do you remember dating girls that young at that time?”

The correct answer is “No. It never happened”.

NOT:

“Not generally, no. If did, you know, I'm not going to dispute anything but I don't remember anything like that.”

At best, this guy is a doofus and whatever Rand saw in him isn’t going to happen. Rand doles out endorsements way too easily.

40 years from now I hope to have the photographic memory you think should exist for everyone. In 40 years, I'm not gonna remember the date I had last week and if someone comes along asking me about it, my first response will be I don't remember.
 
I was iffy on the yearbook. Forgery is possible - the message is rather odd - but it's hard to be 100% certain. Thomas Wictor tweets a lot of wish-fulfillment for Trump supporters.

However, this sounds much more convincing. If Moore can back up his claims with evidence, I'd say the yearbook woman has definitely made false accusations.
Though Nelson says she never met Roy Moore after the alleged assault, he did meet her when he handled her divorce. Judge Moore states he never signed his name with a D.A. but the only instance of using a D.A. is his assistant initializing with a D.A. after his signature. His assistant at the time had the initials D.A. This appears on the divorce paperwork from 1999
 
Last edited:
Back
Top